Venture Scouts: Tell me what I have wrong

Wanted to start a discussion on Venture Scout programs so I thought I’d give my view on them; Please comment on why you think I’m wrong or right:

95% sourcing This is what you’re doing, when you source an opportunity, it gets handed off to a full-time investor and you aren’t part of the analysis/decision making

You only get paid if you source an investment

Very limited file access You may/may not get access to the fund’s CRM (so you know who already has a dialogue with a company/founder) but you won’t get access to all the private information the fund has (portco financials / KPIs, IC decks, research, etc.)

You’re basically just a business development rep Doing cold emails with no real power on those calls, using the VC’s brand name to help them cover more companies and have more insight into who’s raising

Extremely hard to move from scout to full-time investor without any real investment background/experience You’re just doing business development, making it hard to convince the investors you can handle all aspects of VC (sourcing, analysis, investing/deal closing, portco support)

Hot Take: Being a venture scout is a terrific wedge into VC if you already have experience in private investing, but is a waste of time if you don’t; low comp, no training/mentorship, nearly impossible to prove yourself to the fund

What am I missing? What’s right? What’s wrong?

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I mean, you're not wrong, but I think there are better wedges if you're willing to bet on yourself. It's a good way to get a sticker on your resume, but if you're confident in your ability to develop a thesis and execute against it, I don't see why you wouldn't get dealflow and tee up those deals for any fund that wants them. It's less advantageous for the funds because the dealflow becomes commoditized, but you get a foot in the door with many funds and are seen as an independent dealflow generator rather than someone attached to a name. Being attached to a name makes the sourcing easier, so that's why I say it's a better wedge to go solo if you're willing to bet on yourself. 

 

Asperiores error enim cupiditate voluptatum libero. Dolor quis et recusandae. Maxime quaerat similique sequi et aut vero. Ut ut ut esse est minus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”