What to optimize for when recruiting for VC / Growth?
I'm a TMT IB analyst looking to exit into VC / Growth roles after my 2 years. Curious to hear any thoughts on what should be important long-term if I want to stay in the industry, build a strong network, and work with the greatest founders.
Looking for any honest views on how much prestige of fund / fund size / comp / etc should matter for a junior VC in terms of future prospects.
When recruiting for VC or Growth roles, especially as a TMT IB analyst, here’s what you should optimize for based on the most helpful WSO content:
1. Fund Strategy and Stage Fit
2. Prestige of Fund
3. Fund Size and Structure
4. Compensation and Carry
5. Networking and Founder Access
6. Long-Term Career Goals
7. Cultural Fit
Final Thoughts:
While prestige, fund size, and comp are important, the most critical factors are the fund’s strategy, your ability to build a strong network, and the opportunities for growth and learning. Focus on roles that align with your long-term goals and provide exposure to great founders and deals.
Sources: Top Venture Capitals that hire juniors?, Breakdown of Post-IB Exit Opportunities, Q&A: 1st year VC analyst (~750M AUM), Growth Eq/Late Stage VC Recruiters, Q&A: FIG ER to Consumer Growth Equity to Cannabis Startup
Non magnam sit qui eum et est voluptate. Impedit aperiam molestias praesentium nam. Est quisquam vel odio sed aperiam illum. At perferendis cum corrupti accusantium facere quas.
Adipisci aut doloribus nemo fugit libero. Magnam voluptas sequi laboriosam labore quia magni odit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...