Need to Decide between IBM Consulting by Degrees-Strategy and Analytics or EY Business Advisory Financial Services Office

Hi WSO,

I've recently received two offers, one from IBM Strategy and Analytics Consulting and the other from EY Business Advisory in the Financial Services Office. Here are some salary facts:

IBM Salary base 75k
Signing Bonus 7k
I will automatically be considered a "consultant" at IBM and after two years (possibly less) I will be promoted to Senior Consultant
IBM really prides itself on its ability to utilize Big Data Analytics and tech partnerships (Apple, Twitter) and many have said that is where the future lies.
(Note: IBM has two main consulting tracks, "Strategy and Analytics" and then just "Analytics", hope this gives some point of view)

EY Salary Base 70k
Signing Bonus 3k
I will start off as "Staff" and essentially have a three year program.
EY's advisory is planning on growing rapidly and their Financial services office is one of the best (#2 or 3 on vault) in financial consulting.

I truly have no idea which will set me up for the long run. What sort of opportunities does each give me in the future. At first I was leaning towards IBM but I am not sure if that will pigeon hole me in tech. As for EY, I sense that the culture is definitely more uptight than IBM and it seems like I could get stuck doing operations for financial institutions.

As for my goals, I hope to stay in consulting for a few years, no more than 3-5. Ideally I would want to leave for a PE firm (if that's even possible) or try to get into VC (this is my #1 goal). If anyone has any advice or experience with the two I would be very thankful. Also please feel free to explain to me the other great opportunities that I could find as a result of being with one of the two firms.

Thanks!

 

At EY, Staff's are usually there for two years before moving to senior. If you're good, you might be able to move up faster.

When you start in the BAP program, try to align yourself in the group that does the work you are interested in. That way you won't be stuck in operations. If you want to move into PE or VC, it seems financial consulting would be a good. They probably have better growth than IBM right now, as you mentioned, and are prestigious in the financial space.

IBM is known for it's tech work, but that doesn't mean you will get stuck in tech. Salary is good starting off, but I wonder how they will align as you get promoted. The strategy work does sound interesting if you land the projects, see if EY will give you similar projects.

It's a tough choice for sure. Just my two cents.

 

People think the CBD program at IBM is Tech Consulting, and Tech Consulting is...not the audience for WSO. That's why there's strong hate towards the program.

I'm in the CBD program, and it's definitely strategy focused conceptually on technology processes. Then again I can make strong arguments that what I do impacts the bottom line a lot more than my friends at Deloitte/Mercer/even some MBB (if I REALLY get into it).

Is the CBD program perfect? No. I can tell you more over email. But for my future goals in entrepreneurship with a technology focus, the program builds both credibility, connections, and a safe fall-back.

 

I was actually in a similar position as yours a year ago. I would say if its between EY RISK, or IBM CBD, def. go with IBM. As futuredoc mentioned, its between management consulting vs. risk. EY risk is not the glamour, nor are its exit opps.

However, I heard that IBM gets difficult later on when going for promotions and raises, you have to sell yourself a lot, and make a business case, where as EY its more clockwork. Regardless, I believe you'd be able to leverage your work at IBM more and do more interesting work.

Hugo
 

EY's advisory branch is growing very quickly, it might be a good time to get in. But it's still a risk to bank on their potential growth, the brand itself has some work to do to catch the likes of PwC and Deloitte. The BAP program is probably the closest thing they have to management consulting; I think a few BAP's end up getting positions in good MBA programs based on recruiting information I've seen from schools.

I'm not sure how SAP work will look when trying to land a top 10 MBA. It's not really strategy related. If you're interested in technology maybe IT strategy or CIO advisory would be a better look for a top-10 MBA then working on SAP packaged solutions. IBM is a strong brand for consulting though, particulary tech consulting, but I think most kids they send to top MBA programs are from their strategy practice.

 

I am not an expert on this by any means, but I've talked with many people with many different types of work experiences who successfully cracked top 10 mba admissions.

One alum I talked to last month started out at BB back office -> top 10 mba -> MBB consulting. He mentioned that the very top schools (HBS, Wharton, Stanford) basically only take people with MBB / BB IBD / military experience nowadays for non-minority male applicants. But most schools outside of that 'top 3' range are much more forgiving of different types of work experiences, or so I've heard.

That being said, I think you should pick a job offer based on your interest. Which position do you see yourself enjoying more? From either position, you could probably make it to a good mba program if you play your cards right. So, I would focus more on other factors in making the choice.

 

Rerum officia sint eius explicabo. Aut ad dignissimos nulla reiciendis doloribus. Quia ex sit animi occaecati in voluptates.

Ut ex sit ullam. Fuga accusamus est soluta eaque molestias. Non suscipit quis vel facilis qui et qui. Repellat quo iusto eos voluptas omnis ad accusamus. Voluptatum earum qui aliquam amet dolorem. Perferendis explicabo nesciunt dolore et magnam cumque maxime. Similique aut esse quibusdam dolores ratione et et dignissimos.

 

Repellat earum ex similique rerum voluptas ullam accusamus ut. Id vel voluptas earum voluptas voluptate. Rerum eaque unde blanditiis neque aliquid occaecati ad. Quidem non molestiae velit officia eum nemo maiores.

Ut natus architecto non sint nostrum et. Ipsa quae dignissimos error corporis laborum quod. Placeat assumenda similique numquam dolorem voluptatem dolores magnam.

Excepturi est velit vero dolor facere. Modi doloremque facere et ex at facere aliquam. Labore aut voluptas minus magnam voluptatem natus rem. Blanditiis earum sed reiciendis nam quis et aliquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (85) $262
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (65) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (198) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”