Most Helpful

Longer answer to your short question:

  1. Majors don't exist in the UK. Seems like a nuance, but it isn't. A philosophy student in the US at a top school gunning for IB is likely to have some coding/data skills, whereas that's unusual for it in the UK.
  2. As a general rule, subjects matter somewhat but probably less than the US. There's broadly a top category of STEM/Economics followed by Finance/Management and then other respectable non-quant subjects (History, English, Philosophy, etc.). Getting into FO out of subjects with less transferrable skills - think Classics, Modern Languages, etc. - is near-impossible outside of Oxbridge
  3. UCL is a target, albeit a lower one, and Philosophy is probably more respected in the UK than in the US because of the dominance of PPE in public life. I agree with the post above that UCL philosophy is better than most semi or non-targets in something relevant. Would probably say it would be comparable to STEM/Econ/Finance at an upper semi-target like Edinburgh or Durham. You'll have a chance - but to compete against STEM/Econ/Finance students (a large proportion of whom won't get FO from UCL) you'll want to get Spring Weeks. Would also advise that you try to take more quantitative modules/develop decent programming skills to tackle the "social science stigma" that exists in the UK. 
  4. Finally, UK targets - even doing Econ/STEM - are not guarantees of FO. The lack of proper OCR means that UK targets are nowhere near as strong at placing than the top US universities, and you also have very experienced continental Europeans that you're competing with. Look at LSE's placement if you don't believe me - less than 15% of graduates land FO jobs. Situation is even worse for UCL, as ceteris paribus you've got two London unis (LSE/Imperial) that will be preferred plus Oxbridge too. 
  5. Assuming you're American - based on your use of the word "major" - I would strongly consider any US T20 target over UCL. Per above, recruiting is easier, and student resources will be much better. 
     
 

I think the target thing is very important. Even Oxbridge STEM/Econ is no guarantee of BB FO, and some people will even miss out on MM FO. It's a completely different game to going to HYPSW. You can look at the careers stats for these schools.
Oxford: 7% "Banking and Investment" (further 4% in Accounting, Insurance and Financial Services)
LSE: 22% "Financial and Insurance Activities" (15% FO was an educated, probably overly optimistic guess) - how many people are trying to break into finance form LSE? Half? 
Imperial: 13% "Banking and Financial" (further 3% in Accountancy and another 5-10% in "Other Business Related Activities", which probably includes some of the insurance sector covered by LSE's category)
UCL: 8% "Accounting and Financial Services" 
Warwick don't disclose the information to the public (need a staff log-in) and the way Cambridge classifies things is not really comparable to the other four targets. 

It's not like that many people are going into high-powered law/consultancy/engineering/tech jobs instead. Across all four of these universities with comprehensive data available, it looks like maybe 25-50% of people "make it" in terms of their first graduate jobs. There's also the salary gap between America and the UK. Highest average starting salary is Imperial at £37000, bumped up by the lack of soft subjects. No other university in the country is above £32000. Imperial's starting salary is about average for all US college grads, and two-thirds of comparable US STEM-focused schools (CMU, MIT, Berkeley, etc.). Everywhere else in the UK is well below the US median. 

 

It will help you stand out among a sea of STEM/finance/econ applicants which can work to your advantage. Most of the econ/finance students have very similar profiles to each other which is why many of them face problems during the application season (they end up all looking alike on paper). 

As long as you can talk about finance knowledgeably it's not a huge issue at all.

 

Sunt deleniti et molestiae omnis. In repellendus occaecati aperiam maxime quaerat non est.

Eum dolor et rerum nobis ut reprehenderit vitae. Possimus voluptatem tempore rerum voluptas nobis nesciunt nobis. Provident sit qui qui accusantium. Ut eaque placeat libero commodi est corrupti.

Eius sed asperiores laboriosam aut. Rem id veniam fugit voluptatem sed. Quo officiis ut quia et id expedita rerum est.

Tempore quidem necessitatibus amet vel. Quo incidunt est similique nulla facilis qui esse. Voluptatem quaerat non itaque aut alias ut ex.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”