BAML LevFin vs. MS/GS generalist

How would exit opps and experience at BAML LevFin - NY compare to a generalist offer at MS/GS NY? How does BAML place compared to industry groups at these two banks? Is it worth the gamble to take the generalist offer? Thanks!

13 Comments
 

I have a good friend who just left BAML lev fin for PE, so I can provide a little insight.

From what he has said, the exit opps are about as good as they get but the hours are very rough. However, that’s expected in any top group with solid deal flow. Pretty much anyone in that group that wants to do PE makes it into a solid shop.

Not much of a risk taking a GS/MS offer though lol. Very high chance that whatever group you land in with those firms will be solid. Probably just depends on your long term goals.

 

Both are great options! Seems to me that you are considering BAML given that you believe levfin helps you exiting to PE further down the line... and I guess overall levfin does help you exit into PE. However GS and MS are top of the league, and both place a lot of analysts/associates in mega funds, thus id choose GS/MS... On top of that, check FTs article "BofA’s record profits marred by growth concerns" that came out a few days ago.. that would also reinforce my choice.

 

Take MS / GS. The reality is that you will get great buyside looks no matter where you go (among your options) but in terms of building your own “brand” for long term, having GS / MS will be more beneficial.

Additionally, they will give you more flexibility in terms of exit ops should you decide to take a different route.

"I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
 

Couldn't you argue, however, that ending up at a sub par group (relative to other groups at GS/MS) would net less long-term benefit despite the brand name?

Assuming that he is set on going into PE, it seems like BAML Lev Fin would be, potentially, the best option out there. It is an execution focused lev fin group with very strong deal flow, which means the technical experience earned there would be significantly more relevant than that of a random MS/GS group. Granted, the GS name goes a long way, but those in the industry would most likely recognize the caliber of BAML Lev Fin and the skills learned in a debt-focused group.

Just some thoughts

 
Most Helpful

You make some good points on experience but I think you’re handicapping the generalist role at GS / MS a bit much. They still have great technical / transaction experience (relative to most IB analyst spots, although it’s true it may not be the same as BAML levfin).

From a recruiting perspective, I know we (like most large buyside shops) still get enticed by brand name (in terms of interview invites). So candidates from BAML levfin and from GS / MS (including generalists) will get interviews and have the same opportunity for an offer.

Also, aside from maybe the first year post IB, no one is really going to know / care what group you came from at a bank, but you’ll always carry the bank name. Once you move on from Associate (on the buyside), your biography will often not include the group, just the bank. Also, people’s memories regarding individual groups fade and groups move up and down in the rankings. A few years back, going to sponsors / levfin at DB made you the shiz because they were crushing it. ~12 years ago if you were at UBS LA you were the shiz.

At the end of the day it’s a win - win situation. But as someone who took an offer at the strongest group in a less than strongest bank, I’m realizing more and more that there are slight advantages to things like this (despite making it to my current role).

"I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
 

Ipsum doloremque accusantium mollitia est ducimus tempore voluptatem. Non ut et corporis est.

Et temporibus perferendis ut expedita. Laudantium incidunt dignissimos enim magni repellendus voluptas. Voluptas odit sed illum sint rem fugit delectus necessitatibus. Consequatur fugiat itaque corporis voluptatibus nihil distinctio. Aliquam reiciendis maiores dolorem.

Voluptatibus quidem rerum dolorem soluta voluptas necessitatibus in. Illum sunt dolores aut et aspernatur fuga. Quidem cum dolorem assumenda fugiat similique ut. Nisi veniam in animi est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”