Barclays vs. Citi SA?

Besides just looking at league tables which is better for opportunities?

For example it seems that Barclays is known for having a higher return rate and opportunity to do M&A within groups with a strong culture. I have heard bad things about Citi in regards to culture.

Can anyone shed light on pros and cons on both of these options?

 

Hey ngreenbanker2, I'm the WSO Monkey Bot and I am sad to say, but this thread is lonely, so thought I'd post in here to try and help out. Some potential topics that might help:

If we're lucky, the following pros may have something to say: Char fanglinfinance kathryn-walsh

You're welcome.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

I am interested in M&A but do not have any connections at Citi (alumni meaning), I am open to any group honestly.

I heard that Barclays allows analysts to do M&A within coverage groups, do you know about this?

Does citi also allow this?

 

Congrats on the offers.

You're going to be fine either way, but I'd advise you to pick Citi. Both have relatively high return rates and are bulge bracket banks, but in terms of group placement risk, I'd say Citi is a much better option. Because you are interested in M&A, Citi is a lot less risky since you cannot be placed into groups like ECM/DCM (whereas with Barclays, this is a very real risk). And the fact that Citi has a dedicated M&A group does not mean you will not get any M&A experience in the coverage groups. Sometimes it just depends on capacity and which MD sources the deal. Just my two cents.

 

While I take your point that the OP risks placement into capital markets at Barclays, I don't think s/he will have much of a problem if they have as strong (or even just decent) of a network they say they do. SAs aren't directly placed into a group upon getting an offer so they get plenty of time to network into a group they actually do prefer.

OP, I recommend going with the culture that makes the most sense for you as the whole placement process works itself out via networking process. Better fit = higher likelihood of a return offer.

 

Culture is definitely important (and I understand what you're saying), but I personally think that it is tough to make a choice between two banks based on rumors/hearsay about "culture." If the choice were between two specific groups, then that would be a more concrete decision to make, but within each bank, the culture between various groups can vary greatly. Also, culture is inherently subjective. The only way to be 100% sure about culture is to work with those people. You can be somewhat certain about the culture in a group if you have met and talked with a lot of the people in the group, but in my experience, even someone who you can get along with may not be someone who you'd enjoy working with.

Moreover, both Citi and Barclays have extremely high return offer rates. I don't think return rate is a significant enough of a difference to matter.

 

Have you spoken to Barclays CEO/top executives or just read an article in Financial Times? Not fighting if Citi is better choice or not but giving people any piece of advice based on press rumours is like saying "You have to leave GS now, Blankfein is gonna retire this year and I heard they will go down". See the point?

 
Controversial

I see your point but personally I disagree. Barclays IB is closer to competing with UBS, Nomura, SocGen than the other BBs. While All of S&T is being threatened everywhere, Barclays is especially bad at it. So you have a BB that has a weak Investment bank and Markets division. On the other hand you have Citi which has one of the best M&A deal flows, is arguably one of the strongest banks across US, EU and Asia, and every year kids choose Citi over firms that (often) are considered to be more prestigious. I highly doubt anyone is going to take Barclays over GS.

Finally, while it is relatively unimportant at a junior level, Jes Staley is incompetent like no other BB CEO

 
Most Helpful

Personally, I think Citi has the edge in terms of deal flow and general momentum versus Barclays but I also suggest reflecting on who do you think you had a better experience with during your interviews/where you might fit in better culturally.

I've had friends on both the IB & S&T side of Citi leave early solely because of how much they hated the culture, but also have met individuals who've genuinely enjoyed their experience. I don't know if there's a right or wrong decision here and Citi has dedicated greater resources towards expanding its IB platform, but I think the points on culture others bring up are important to consider.

 

Pick whichever bank you have made the best connections with. Deal flow will be similar unless you're in the best/worst groups at each. Culture differs a lot but will depend on how you fit in and your own personality.

Be excellent to each other, and party on, dudes.
 

Nihil voluptatem quasi mollitia voluptate animi qui est. Consequatur molestiae aut enim consequatur. Tempore aliquid ipsum delectus nobis. Et molestias voluptatem reprehenderit magnam.

Ut ut saepe harum exercitationem eveniet eius. Id quaerat eligendi incidunt qui. Sed est quo aperiam iusto illo id error.

Itaque provident adipisci fuga a voluptatum labore. Occaecati ut earum consequatur totam non. Consequatur in sapiente et occaecati. Ad molestias et dignissimos sed.

Autem aut repudiandae expedita consequatur. Molestiae autem ut ut est velit repellat dolorum. Et quaerat modi ea qui. Ut laudantium eum ipsa sapiente a. Quidem omnis ipsa est fugit et. Possimus minima sit pariatur saepe autem et.

 

Quia molestiae repudiandae sed reiciendis. Error corrupti tempora amet est harum quia deserunt. Eum dicta rerum aut molestiae. Optio hic quia officiis provident quas. Omnis velit assumenda natus facere voluptates quo quo.

Quo ut vero perferendis expedita. Eos saepe dolore dolor sint sequi ea et. Qui accusamus quo nemo dolores sit beatae. Quam enim odio harum quisquam.

Exercitationem expedita soluta delectus dolorum ipsam qui saepe. Corrupti voluptas nihil voluptatum beatae molestiae omnis quis. Commodi pariatur voluptatem voluptatum. Vitae reprehenderit cum in rerum quia doloribus sed deleniti. Atque illum sed harum voluptatem dicta. Reiciendis recusandae omnis temporibus ea exercitationem quam. Eius et est quibusdam accusamus est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”