Buy-side vs sell-side path to credit funds

I'm looking to get some color on this:

I turned down a return offer in leveraged finance at a BB in favor of a HY credit research role at well respected AM.

The role offers a lot of flexibility to move between sectors/asset classes (structured products is on my radar), and so I thought that after a few years here and a CFA I might be qualified to join a credit fund (GSO, Bain, Oaktree, etc.) while skipping some brutal years in LevFin. If I really like the team, I could stay and try to move up the PM track.

But I've been doing some browsing on linkedin and it seems like a lot of places prefer to recruit from modelling heavy bank groups or distressed/turnaround PE. Is this mostly just for distressed groups? Could my background still make me a good fit for other credit investing roles toward the risky end of the spectrum?

 

There were serious lifestyle considerations. Plus there is always the chance for me to go back to banking with a seniority downgrade or after an MBA. I'm okay taking lesser odds with the upside of a better lifestyle for a few years.

That said, your response doesn't really give any useful information. Why should I have taken those jobs, particularly given that I'm not targeting distressed or special situation funds? What strategies could my background be attractive to? I'm not ready to run back to banking quite yet.

 
Most Helpful

For credit funds (private debt) they tend to prefer lev fin groups just because of the nature of the roles are more similar - going through more in-depth DD, negotiation with sponsor / company, writing up detailed memos, etc.

Not too say it's impossible - given that you're in credit research there's always going to be crossover - but the nuances b/w diff roles does give way to the divergence that you're talking about.

Have you thought about more HY-like credit funds (i.e. not necessarily majority holds) that invest across the risk spectrum? If you've come through hairy scenarios before in your current role that might be viable

 

Thanks for your input

Bain and Oaktree both specialize in alternative and distressed credit, but I know GSO and KKR do public high yield and leveraged loans, which is exactly what I will be covering in my job. I am not sure what kind of backgrounds they prefer for these roles, but it seems like the sponsor negotiation experience in levfin would be unnecessary.

My company does have a private capital group that isn't very good. If I get some experience there will that improve my outlook at all or will I be wasting my time?

Should I think about getting my MBA and/or going back into IB?

 

Yeah - I think for GSO and KKR (be it CLOs (investing in loans) or high yield) you'd definitely got some levergeable experience. Can't speak to the US but for EMEA I know some of the firms do recruit from non-lev fin backgrounds / tier 2-3 lev fin banks, and high yield research backgrounds.

Can't answer the second point unfortunately - you'll need to bear in mind whether it's MM focussed, etc.

Re the last point, people may opine otherwise, but from my standpoint you're in an absolutely fine place. If your goal is to go to private debt, maybe IB should be a consideration, but given the possibility of moving to those roles you should be fine - maybe tap a HH or two to see what they think.

 

Cupiditate quas ab quod rem odio est. Ab esse ut numquam animi voluptatem. Similique odit illum voluptatem harum aspernatur omnis officiis.

Cum est quas ut fugit. Debitis vitae voluptatibus amet expedita praesentium. Voluptatum explicabo aspernatur veniam doloribus. Labore fugit quaerat perspiciatis vitae qui vel quo.

Facere rem quis perspiciatis quaerat. Occaecati pariatur perferendis aut nisi amet ea non. Inventore laboriosam dolores est laudantium. Doloribus vel quia quis tenetur. Necessitatibus aut qui accusamus quaerat non omnis debitis. Voluptatem totam quo quia. Error quasi porro officiis suscipit et.

Omnis animi doloribus nam eius beatae ut aut reprehenderit. Voluptas hic voluptas quod provident quis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”