Credit Funds: Differing Skillsets

I'm currently at a buyside shop (bank) focused on broadly syndicated loans and looking to make a move to either a bigger shop with more career upside (a scalable CLO platform) or a more opportunistic credit platform (MM/BDC, junior debt, stressed/distressed) .

I have had reasonable success getting interviews and varying success moving through the process (finals rounds/offers or dinged in the 1st round) with no real correlation to the type of strategy of the fund.

Some firms are happy with my base knowledge and willing to train up, whereas other shops have dinged me after the first round due to lack of i.) credit agreement negotiation; ii.) direct management exposure at the middle market level; or iii.) apparently less detailed modelling/diligence experience.

I was wondering if anyone with direct experience could comment on the differences in experience and skillset. I like to think the shop I am at right now has a pretty robust diligence and modelling process (base case / downside cases / recovery analysis / company valuations, etc) but it obviously doesnt fit the bill for some shops.

Also, any thoughts on filling that skillgap?

Thank you

Comments (4)

Feb 24, 2019

Disclaimer, I know I'm bumping a nearly two year old thread

Technoviking my friend will you PM me? (I don't have any PMs as I rarely comment on this site)

Curious to hear where you're at now and your experiences with interviews

Mar 3, 2019

I think credit agreement negotiation would be the #1 ding, however, I am curious as to the types of loans you are buying? If they are investment grade, its likely that they would rather see leveraged loans/2nd Lien/mezzanine investments, as you are digging deeper/modeling is more robust and you are truly rolling up your sleeves.

Mar 5, 2019

leveraged loans, mostly TLBs but when you arent an anchor ticket or a big name CLO the reality is you're not negotiating /pushing back on terms. you either give feedback or you move onto the next opportunity.

Mar 3, 2019