Comments (5)

Aug 5, 2009

I find his discussion about treating employees well in contrast to the only public record out there about how he treats employees.

For those interested in learning more, see 323 F. Supp. 2d 573

Aug 5, 2009
MMmonkey:

I find his discussion about treating employees well in contrast to the only public record out there about how he treats employees.

For those interested in learning more, see 323 F. Supp. 2d 573

I disagree. The MD that was inquiring about a job obviously had way too big of an ego for a HF guy that just got axed. Loeb asked a very simple question, and the guy was just too uptight and obnoxious to appreciate a somewhat non-traditional approach.

And the guy was not his employee.

Aug 5, 2009
Marcus_Halberstram:

I disagree. The MD that was inquiring about a job obviously had way too big of an ego for a HF guy that just got axed. Loeb asked a very simple question, and the guy was just too uptight and obnoxious to appreciate a somewhat non-traditional approach.

And the guy was not his employee.

No offense, but you don't know what I'm referring to. I am not referring to what you are talking about. That was an exchange of e-mails. I am referring to a publicly available SDNY court opinion that involves an actual employee.

Aug 5, 2009

My mistake, haven't seen that. Do you have a link?

Aug 5, 2009
Comment