I'm an incoming analyst and just curious if its possible to do on-cycle recruiting 1 year later - as opposed to immediately. I would imagine I would have to stay an extra year as a third year analyst.
| +54 | Working on Juneteenth | 32 | 37m |
| +24 | From Public Equities to Private Equities | 4 | 3d |
| +22 | Hardest time I have ever seen to be a GP | 3 | 1h |
| +18 | Weighing exit from LMM PC/PE | 1 | 2d |
| +17 | Becoming a great VC/PE investor - advice | 4 | 5d |
| Search Fund Internship Vs. Internship at my family's Family Office | 9 | 22m | |
| +14 | Anyone have intel on Aterian Investment Partners? Culture, Comp, Performance? | 9 | 3d |
| +13 | Healthcare PE | 6 | 13h |
| +12 | LMM groups within larger platforms? | 1 | 4d |
| +11 | Reality of the move from LMM to MM | 1 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Bump
You definitely can. Some analysts at my BB did recruiting during their 2nd year and still managed to leave banking in 2 years. I would say the split between that scenario and doing a 3rd year is 50/50, based on my immediate network at least. Regardless, recruiting 1 year in may actually be seen as a good thing given how early PE recruiting is happening these days.
Thanks, definitely okay with doing a third year.
Quis nulla autem perferendis voluptatibus. Quaerat quisquam tempora iure est ipsam voluptates.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...