How to choose a company to analyse given 0 assumptions?

Hi all! Per my title above, would love to get some insights / validate my train of thought from PE/modelling experts.Apologies if that’s something stupid - this is my first PE interview, so I want to get it right. 

I was given a set of public companies from which I have to choose one and prepare an LBO model. My understanding is that I need to choose a company that fits the most the investment thesis (growing company, focus on revenue expansion rather pure debt math)

 But this is for me the trickiest part: I quickly analysed every company and got stuck because there is none that would fit the thesis.

> 2 of them had stable/stagnant revenues in the past 3 years, OK profit margin, one operates in a segment with more barriers to entry than another one. However the one with less barriers to entry seems to be more promising


> 2 of them have great growth but are enourmously overpriced. I struggle to see how this can be grown further and sold down the line at the same multiples.

>1 seems ok but it’s a very small company with almost no financial information publicly available (float c. 5%), and esp not established enough 


Question is: how do I get out of the weeds ? I don’t want to choose a random company out of 5, I get a feeling that I will be judged on my choice too. 


So right now I thought to go with one of the first 2 (not so much growth, ok margins, not that overpriced). Am I doing it wrong ? Or should I just go randomly with the one where I have the most info available lol 


On top of that, I need to create my own assumptions about the transaction & Debt structure. I thought to check what was the leverage level in the sector, but how should I go with the pricing?

Apologies again if that’s noob, but i would be glad to receive any guidance and help. Thank you!

1 Comments
 

Tempora aut assumenda facere aut. Perspiciatis sed omnis qui laborum magnam modi. Aut minima est quia quia rerum suscipit quas. Suscipit et minus provident nesciunt exercitationem.

Laboriosam pariatur repudiandae sit harum. Eos dicta omnis in amet enim iure autem. Laboriosam facere dolorem omnis voluptas est ea ratione. Aut voluptas ex quasi reiciendis. Quasi et magnam atque sunt fuga nemo.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”