How to choose a company to analyse given 0 assumptions?

Hi all! Per my title above, would love to get some insights / validate my train of thought from PE/modelling experts.Apologies if that’s something stupid - this is my first PE interview, so I want to get it right. 

I was given a set of public companies from which I have to choose one and prepare an LBO model. My understanding is that I need to choose a company that fits the most the investment thesis (growing company, focus on revenue expansion rather pure debt math)

 But this is for me the trickiest part: I quickly analysed every company and got stuck because there is none that would fit the thesis.

> 2 of them had stable/stagnant revenues in the past 3 years, OK profit margin, one operates in a segment with more barriers to entry than another one. However the one with less barriers to entry seems to be more promising


> 2 of them have great growth but are enourmously overpriced. I struggle to see how this can be grown further and sold down the line at the same multiples.

>1 seems ok but it’s a very small company with almost no financial information publicly available (float c. 5%), and esp not established enough 


Question is: how do I get out of the weeds ? I don’t want to choose a random company out of 5, I get a feeling that I will be judged on my choice too. 


So right now I thought to go with one of the first 2 (not so much growth, ok margins, not that overpriced). Am I doing it wrong ? Or should I just go randomly with the one where I have the most info available lol 


On top of that, I need to create my own assumptions about the transaction & Debt structure. I thought to check what was the leverage level in the sector, but how should I go with the pricing?

Apologies again if that’s noob, but i would be glad to receive any guidance and help. Thank you!

3 Comments
 

To tackle your dilemma effectively, here's a structured approach based on the most helpful WSO content:

1. Choosing the Right Company

  • Focus on Predictable Cash Flows and Resilience: A good LBO candidate typically has steady and predictable free cash flows, limited capex and working capital requirements, and resilience to economic downturns. Among your options, the two companies with stable revenues and OK profit margins seem to align better with these criteria.
  • Barriers to Entry vs. Growth Potential: Between the two stable companies, prioritize the one operating in a segment with higher barriers to entry. This provides a competitive advantage and reduces the risk of new entrants disrupting the market.
  • Avoid Overpriced Companies: The two companies with great growth but high valuations are risky. Overpaying for a company limits your ability to achieve strong returns, especially if you can't sell at the same multiples later.
  • Small Company with Limited Data: The company with minimal financial information and a small float is risky for an LBO. Lack of transparency and scale can make it challenging to build a robust model and justify your assumptions.

2. Validating Your Choice

  • Your instinct to go with one of the first two companies is correct. These options provide a balance of stability and manageable risk, which is crucial for an LBO. Avoid randomness—your choice will indeed be judged, and a thoughtful rationale is key.

3. Building Assumptions for the Transaction

  • Leverage Levels: Research comparable companies in the same sector to determine typical leverage ratios. Spread their capital structures (e.g., revolvers, term loans, bonds) and calculate leverage based on Adjusted EBITDA.
  • Pricing: Use public comparables to estimate a reasonable purchase multiple. Look at historical transactions in the sector for guidance. If the company is public, consider its current trading multiple but adjust for any premium you'd pay in an acquisition.
  • Debt Structure: Ensure your assumptions are realistic and defensible. For example, consider interest coverage ratios and the company's ability to service debt under different scenarios.

4. Presenting Your Choice

  • Clearly articulate why you chose the company. Highlight its stable cash flows, manageable risk profile, and alignment with an LBO investment thesis.
  • Acknowledge any limitations (e.g., slower growth) but explain how these are offset by other strengths (e.g., resilience, barriers to entry).

5. Additional Tips

  • Prepare for Questions: Be ready to defend your choice and assumptions. Interviewers will likely probe your reasoning and the feasibility of your model.
  • Focus on Value Creation: Emphasize how you plan to create value post-acquisition, such as operational improvements, cost-cutting, or bolt-on acquisitions.

By following this structured approach, you'll demonstrate a thoughtful and methodical decision-making process, which is exactly what interviewers are looking for in a PE candidate. Good luck!

Sources: Private Credit Resources and Prep, Basic Guide Ramping Up On A Company With Public Information Part Three, Q&A: I’ve held Pre-MBA MM LBO, Growth Equity and Venture Capital investment roles for funds with $500M+ AUM to $5B+ AUM, PE professional, what's your process while judging an investment?, My Investing Framework: How to Analyze a Company

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

I think your approach sounds about right. The main thing is that you should be able to clearly defend your choices — I don’t think there is necessarily a single “right” or “wrong” answer in this context.

I would try to dig a bit deeper into the customer base of the companies. Look through their annual reports and see whether they disclose any customer concentration, what types of customers they serve, and whether there is a meaningful exposure to blue-chip customers or, conversely, any major customer dependencies. Also think about potential supply-chain risks or other operational dependencies.

On top of that, I would spend some time thinking about potential add-on acquisitions. How fragmented is the market? Is there a meaningful opportunity to build a larger platform through M&A? It could also be useful to look at the portfolio companies of your fund and see whether there are any similar businesses or situations where you could draw parallels.

For the debt structure, I would just make reasonable assumptions and explain them. I can’t speak as confidently for the US market since I’m more familiar with Europe, but I’m sure you can find some information on leveraged finance / private credit pricing. Broadly speaking, it’s basically a benchmark rate (e.g. SOFR) plus a spread. In Europe, debt fund financing is currently around EURIBOR + ~500 bps, with bank financing typically somewhat cheaper. The exact assumption is less important than being able to explain why you think it is reasonable.

 

Et et enim ipsam. Quia eum eum quo amet.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (39) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”