Don't do an analyst stint if you want to stay in banking...

I've read that saying a couple of times on WSO. I think that there's a slight chance I might want to banking for a long term. Is it really true that you should not do an analyst stint if that's the case?

46 Comments
 
DaisukiDaYo

Don't work at a job you want to do in the future because you want to do the job in the future. Makes sense.

I honestly don't think this sentiment is as silly as it sounds.

This situation is a bit of a catch-22. The reason that you've heard people saying things like this is because being a banking analyst is rough. The work isn't very intellectually stimulating (though most jobs aren't), and you'll be doing a lot of it, at all times of the night. As a consequence, most analysts - even those that come in hoping to do banking long-term - get burned out early, which would not help your goal to continue in banking.

That said, you chances of moving on in banking are much higher if you start as an analyst. Plenty of analysts can directly promote to associate if they so choose. A bit of a predicament.

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 
NorthSider DaisukiDaYo:

Don't work at a job you want to do in the future because you want to do the job in the future. Makes sense.

I honestly don't think this sentiment is as silly as it sounds.

This situation is a bit of a catch-22. The reason that you've heard people saying things like this is because being a banking analyst is rough. The work isn't very intellectually stimulating (though most jobs aren't), and you'll be doing a lot of it, at all times of the night. As a consequence, most analysts - even those that come in hoping to do banking long-term - get burned out early, which would not help your goal to continue in banking.

That said, you chances of moving on in banking are much higher if you start as an analyst. Plenty of analysts can directly promote to associate if they so choose. A bit of a predicament.

Thanks for the insight. I wonder how many analysts go off to B-School with a goal to come back into IBD.

 
NorthSider DaisukiDaYo:

Don't work at a job you want to do in the future because you want to do the job in the future. Makes sense.

I honestly don't think this sentiment is as silly as it sounds.

This situation is a bit of a catch-22. The reason that you've heard people saying things like this is because being a banking analyst is rough. The work isn't very intellectually stimulating (though most jobs aren't), and you'll be doing a lot of it, at all times of the night. As a consequence, most analysts - even those that come in hoping to do banking long-term - get burned out early, which would not help your goal to continue in banking.

That said, you chances of moving on in banking are much higher if you start as an analyst. Plenty of analysts can directly promote to associate if they so choose. A bit of a predicament.

I would think it's better to test the waters out now and see if you enjoy it - you'll experience burnout either way as an analyst or associate; the difference is as an associate, you'll have a lot more opportunity cost that comes w/ switching jobs, etc.

Banking is a marathon either way - if you can't handle the analyst program, you'll be hardpressed when your first experience as an IB associate is comparable and you have a family, huge MBA loans, etc.

 
NorthSider analysts can directly promote to associate if they so choose.
How common is it for analysts to be promoted to associate without requiring them to go back for an MBA? If this does happen, does the bank ever require them to get an MBA?
 
DaisukiDaYo

Don't work at a job you want to do in the future because you want to do the job in the future. Makes sense.

Some people said the analyst stint just burns you out and is completely different from what you would do as a senior banker. So it might be better to do something else and go to top MBA after a few years and then start your banking career.

 
Sexy Sam

heard people with IB analyst experience tends to do well as they climb up the ladder.

IF they climb up the latter at all. Most A2As leave during their Associate years.

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 

FWIW, A2As generally turn out a lot better at elite boutiques than at the BBs.

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 

A lot of great comments ITT. (Note: I am not a banker).

If you are interested then hit the ground running through internships and right out of college. I personally don't understand why any individual would want to live as a banker but to each their own.

I also agree w/ b-school comments. I currently see b-school only as a way to "rebrand" yourself for a different career path (I hear Harvard works differently). If I want to keep on doing what I'm doing and have the background/experience then b-school makes absolutely no sense (Banking/Trading/Asset Mgmt). I hear it's a bit different at F500 companies though since they want some kind of brand ______ .

 

The thing to remember here is that analysts who want to stay in banking, can. The issue is that no analysts want to. Part of it is the burnout, sure. But a lot more of it is that if you like corporate finance, you see that there are far more intellectually stimulating (and lucrative) careers that allow you to use those skills (pe/hf).

Associates, on the other hand, tend to face more limited options, and by virtue of being older, typically have less flexibility to just say 'fuck this i hate my life i'm quitting' (because of spouses and toddlers).

If you can go into banking as an analyst, I'd say that's definitely the time to do it. If you really think that being a senior banker seems like a rewarding career at that point, you can figure out how to make it happen. More likely, you will be like 100% of my banking class (at my BB, there is literally nobody left from my class) and decide to go where the grass is greener.

 
xqtrack

The thing to remember here is that analysts who want to stay in banking, can. The issue is that no analysts want to. Part of it is the burnout, sure. But a lot more of it is that if you like corporate finance, you see that there are far more intellectually stimulating (and lucrative) careers that allow you to use those skills (pe/hf).

Associates, on the other hand, tend to face more limited options, and by virtue of being older, typically have less flexibility to just say 'fuck this i hate my life i'm quitting' (because of spouses and toddlers).

If you can go into banking as an analyst, I'd say that's definitely the time to do it. If you really think that being a senior banker seems like a rewarding career at that point, you can figure out how to make it happen. More likely, you will be like 100% of my banking class (at my BB, there is literally nobody left from my class) and decide to go where the grass is greener.

Did any of your co-workers at BB think about the job security in IBD compared to PE/HF? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I feel like once you lose your job in PE post MBA or HF, it's difficult to find a similar job that pays just as well. Whereas I "think" if you get laid off as a VP at BAML it's quite easy to get another job at a bank that pays just as much. Also- this is more geared towards PE, but since it's really tough to get into PE post MBA, there's a good chance you might just end up coming back to banking after wasting a couple of years. What do you think?

 

the American experience is quite different from Europe. Most American analysts go for MBAs and then go elsewhere or returns as Associates.

The issue is that many people prefer to start off as associates coming from consulting because Associate is definitely more enjoyable than being an Analyst. The tradeoff between growing into an Associate from A1 versus being a consultant and then MBA Associate is the slightly lower consulting salary versus MUCH better work life balance in consulting.

I personally think though, that if you cannot stand the job as an analyst, you probably wont become a huge fan later on, because the essence of it does not change until you make VP.

working as an analyst as opposed to the MBA associate route gives you much more technical knowledge and experienced analysts often find MBA associates to be hard to work with as they essentially have to learn quite a lot of the basics that 3rd year analysts would already know.

If you have to ask how much it costs, you cannot afford it
 

Being an analyst is as tough as it gets -- agreed. But being an associate isn't all fun and games either. I see my associates in on weekends all the time and they still are eating dinner with the scum analysts most nights. One downside of going analyst-->associate is that many Former-analyst associates still act like analysts (doing to much of the technical stuff, not delegating enough), which sucks for them.Then again, some fresh-from-Wharton/HBS/Stanford Associates are completely out of touch and no one likes to do work for them.

Oh well, I guess you win some you lose some... As logs as the outcome is income.

Feeling Good, Living Better
 
CarriedDisinterest

Being an analyst is as tough as it gets -- agreed. But being an associate isn't all fun and games either. I see my associates in on weekends all the time and they still are eating dinner with the scum analysts most nights. One downside of going analyst-->associate is that many Former-analyst associates still act like analysts (doing to much of the technical stuff, not delegating enough), which sucks for them.Then again, some fresh-from-Wharton/HBS/Stanford Associates are completely out of touch and no one likes to do work for them.

Oh well, I guess you win some you lose some... As logs as the outcome is income.

To expand on this, if you go A-A, the senior bankers "love" you - meaning they have MUCH higher expectations of you, will overstaff you, and will tear you apart much more often than the idiot straight out of bschool. Most of the "upside" of being an associate is that you can't do analyst work and aren't asked to. If you take the promote, you'll be doing analyst work and associate work. You may end up ranking higher, but you may also end up burning out or spending too much time doing analyst work (that the seniors implicitly expect you to do) which could make you actually rank lower than someone with less of the hardcore banking skillset than you have. I've seen this happen.

 
LifestyleBanker CarriedDisinterest:

Being an analyst is as tough as it gets -- agreed. But being an associate isn't all fun and games either. I see my associates in on weekends all the time and they still are eating dinner with the scum analysts most nights. One downside of going analyst-->associate is that many Former-analyst associates still act like analysts (doing to much of the technical stuff, not delegating enough), which sucks for them.Then again, some fresh-from-Wharton/HBS/Stanford Associates are completely out of touch and no one likes to do work for them.
Oh well, I guess you win some you lose some... As logs as the outcome is income.

To expand on this, if you go A-A, the senior bankers "love" you - meaning they have MUCH higher expectations of you, will overstaff you, and will tear you apart much more often than the idiot straight out of bschool. Most of the "upside" of being an associate is that you can't do analyst work and aren't asked to. If you take the promote, you'll be doing analyst work and associate work. You may end up ranking higher, but you may also end up burning out or spending too much time doing analyst work (that the seniors implicitly expect you to do) which could make you actually rank lower than someone with less of the hardcore banking skillset than you have. I've seen this happen.

Although I agree that this happens, in my experience it's usually because the Associate fails at delegating rather than the senior bankers pressuring him to do all the work himself.

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 
LifestyleBanker CarriedDisinterest:

Being an analyst is as tough as it gets -- agreed. But being an associate isn't all fun and games either. I see my associates in on weekends all the time and they still are eating dinner with the scum analysts most nights. One downside of going analyst-->associate is that many Former-analyst associates still act like analysts (doing to much of the technical stuff, not delegating enough), which sucks for them.Then again, some fresh-from-Wharton/HBS/Stanford Associates are completely out of touch and no one likes to do work for them.
Oh well, I guess you win some you lose some... As logs as the outcome is income.

To expand on this, if you go A-A, the senior bankers "love" you - meaning they have MUCH higher expectations of you, will overstaff you, and will tear you apart much more often than the idiot straight out of bschool. Most of the "upside" of being an associate is that you can't do analyst work and aren't asked to. If you take the promote, you'll be doing analyst work and associate work. You may end up ranking higher, but you may also end up burning out or spending too much time doing analyst work (that the seniors implicitly expect you to do) which could make you actually rank lower than someone with less of the hardcore banking skillset than you have. I've seen this happen.

Interesting. What about if someone comes in from a M7 MBA and did a 2 year analyst stint pre-MBA? Are they treated similar as the A-A promotes?

 
AsianMonky LifestyleBanker:

CarriedDisinterest:
Being an analyst is as tough as it gets -- agreed. But being an associate isn't all fun and games either. I see my associates in on weekends all the time and they still are eating dinner with the scum analysts most nights. One downside of going analyst-->associate is that many Former-analyst associates still act like analysts (doing to much of the technical stuff, not delegating enough), which sucks for them.Then again, some fresh-from-Wharton/HBS/Stanford Associates are completely out of touch and no one likes to do work for them.
Oh well, I guess you win some you lose some... As logs as the outcome is income.

To expand on this, if you go A-A, the senior bankers "love" you - meaning they have MUCH higher expectations of you, will overstaff you, and will tear you apart much more often than the idiot straight out of bschool. Most of the "upside" of being an associate is that you can't do analyst work and aren't asked to. If you take the promote, you'll be doing analyst work and associate work. You may end up ranking higher, but you may also end up burning out or spending too much time doing analyst work (that the seniors implicitly expect you to do) which could make you actually rank lower than someone with less of the hardcore banking skillset than you have. I've seen this happen.

Interesting. What about if someone comes in from a M7 MBA and did a 2 year analyst stint pre-MBA? Are they treated similar as the A-A promotes?

No one wants to do an MBA and come back to banking if they were already an analyst... Why do you keep coming back to this concept? It almost never happens and when it does, I guess the answer you are looking for is that the current analysts think that person is pathetic. It just makes no sense.
 
rufiolove AsianMonky:

LifestyleBanker:

CarriedDisinterest:
Being an analyst is as tough as it gets -- agreed. But being an associate isn't all fun and games either. I see my associates in on weekends all the time and they still are eating dinner with the scum analysts most nights. One downside of going analyst-->associate is that many Former-analyst associates still act like analysts (doing to much of the technical stuff, not delegating enough), which sucks for them.Then again, some fresh-from-Wharton/HBS/Stanford Associates are completely out of touch and no one likes to do work for them.
Oh well, I guess you win some you lose some... As logs as the outcome is income.
To expand on this, if you go A-A, the senior bankers "love" you - meaning they have MUCH higher expectations of you, will overstaff you, and will tear you apart much more often than the idiot straight out of bschool. Most of the "upside" of being an associate is that you can't do analyst work and aren't asked to. If you take the promote, you'll be doing analyst work and associate work. You may end up ranking higher, but you may also end up burning out or spending too much time doing analyst work (that the seniors implicitly expect you to do) which could make you actually rank lower than someone with less of the hardcore banking skillset than you have. I've seen this happen.

Interesting. What about if someone comes in from a M7 MBA and did a 2 year analyst stint pre-MBA? Are they treated similar as the A-A promotes?

No one wants to do an MBA and come back to banking if they were already an analyst... Why do you keep coming back to this concept? It almost never happens and when it does, I guess the answer you are looking for is that the current analysts think that person is pathetic. It just makes no sense.

And I don't know of anyone who does B-School after 2yrs as an analyst, unless they wan to transition to something completely different. Even then, they're probably wasting their money.

Feeling Good, Living Better
 
rufiolove AsianMonky:

LifestyleBanker:

CarriedDisinterest:
Being an analyst is as tough as it gets -- agreed. But being an associate isn't all fun and games either. I see my associates in on weekends all the time and they still are eating dinner with the scum analysts most nights. One downside of going analyst-->associate is that many Former-analyst associates still act like analysts (doing to much of the technical stuff, not delegating enough), which sucks for them.Then again, some fresh-from-Wharton/HBS/Stanford Associates are completely out of touch and no one likes to do work for them.
Oh well, I guess you win some you lose some... As logs as the outcome is income.
To expand on this, if you go A-A, the senior bankers "love" you - meaning they have MUCH higher expectations of you, will overstaff you, and will tear you apart much more often than the idiot straight out of bschool. Most of the "upside" of being an associate is that you can't do analyst work and aren't asked to. If you take the promote, you'll be doing analyst work and associate work. You may end up ranking higher, but you may also end up burning out or spending too much time doing analyst work (that the seniors implicitly expect you to do) which could make you actually rank lower than someone with less of the hardcore banking skillset than you have. I've seen this happen.

Interesting. What about if someone comes in from a M7 MBA and did a 2 year analyst stint pre-MBA? Are they treated similar as the A-A promotes?

No one wants to do an MBA and come back to banking if they were already an analyst... Why do you keep coming back to this concept? It almost never happens and when it does, I guess the answer you are looking for is that the current analysts think that person is pathetic. It just makes no sense.

I've met a few people that have done analyst stint at MM and went to H/S/W and came back to banking. I think there was a thread comparing A2A vs. doing MBA in between, and I *think the general consensus was MBA might pay off in the long run because of 1)pedigree (if non or semi-target) 2)network 3)well-roundedness and 4) career protection if shit happens and you get fired. Why do you think it's a crazy idea?

 
AsianMonky rufiolove:

AsianMonky:

LifestyleBanker:
CarriedDisinterest:
Being an analyst is as tough as it gets -- agreed. But being an associate isn't all fun and games either. I see my associates in on weekends all the time and they still are eating dinner with the scum analysts most nights. One downside of going analyst-->associate is that many Former-analyst associates still act like analysts (doing to much of the technical stuff, not delegating enough), which sucks for them.Then again, some fresh-from-Wharton/HBS/Stanford Associates are completely out of touch and no one likes to do work for them.
Oh well, I guess you win some you lose some... As logs as the outcome is income.
To expand on this, if you go A-A, the senior bankers "love" you - meaning they have MUCH higher expectations of you, will overstaff you, and will tear you apart much more often than the idiot straight out of bschool. Most of the "upside" of being an associate is that you can't do analyst work and aren't asked to. If you take the promote, you'll be doing analyst work and associate work. You may end up ranking higher, but you may also end up burning out or spending too much time doing analyst work (that the seniors implicitly expect you to do) which could make you actually rank lower than someone with less of the hardcore banking skillset than you have. I've seen this happen.
Interesting. What about if someone comes in from a M7 MBA and did a 2 year analyst stint pre-MBA? Are they treated similar as the A-A promotes?

No one wants to do an MBA and come back to banking if they were already an analyst... Why do you keep coming back to this concept? It almost never happens and when it does, I guess the answer you are looking for is that the current analysts think that person is pathetic. It just makes no sense.

I've met a few people that have done analyst stint at MM and went to H/S/W and came back to banking. I think there was a thread comparing A2A vs. doing MBA in between, and I *think the general consensus was MBA might pay off in the long run because of 1)pedigree (if non or semi-target) 2)network 3)well-roundedness
and 4) career protection if shit happens and you get fired. Why do you think it's a crazy idea?

 
AsianMonky

I've met a few people that have done analyst stint at MM and went to H/S/W and came back to banking. I think there was a thread comparing A2A vs. doing MBA in between, and I *think the general consensus was MBA might pay off in the long run because of 1)pedigree (if non or semi-target) 2)network 3)well-roundedness
and 4) career protection if shit happens and you get fired. Why do you think it's a crazy idea?

Who cares about pedigree if you're going to have the same job before and after the insertion of the pedigree?? $500k+ in opportunity costs is a lot to pay for "career protection" and "well-roundedness".

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 
NorthSider AsianMonky:

I've met a few people that have done analyst stint at MM and went to H/S/W and came back to banking. I think there was a thread comparing A2A vs. doing MBA in between, and I *think the general consensus was MBA might pay off in the long run because of 1)pedigree (if non or semi-target) 2)network 3)well-roundedness
and 4) career protection if shit happens and you get fired. Why do you think it's a crazy idea?

Who cares about pedigree if you're going to have the same job before and after the insertion of the pedigree?? $500k+ in opportunity costs is a lot to pay for "career protection" and "well-roundedness".

What about preftige?

 
NorthSider AsianMonky:

I've met a few people that have done analyst stint at MM and went to H/S/W and came back to banking. I think there was a thread comparing A2A vs. doing MBA in between, and I *think the general consensus was MBA might pay off in the long run because of 1)pedigree (if non or semi-target) 2)network 3)well-roundedness
and 4) career protection if shit happens and you get fired. Why do you think it's a crazy idea?

Who cares about pedigree if you're going to have the same job before and after the insertion of the pedigree?? $500k+ in opportunity costs is a lot to pay for "career protection" and "well-roundedness".

Very good point Northsider. Just curious, what kind of jobs do you think are available for a Investment Banking VP outside of IBD if he/she gets laid off or decides to call it quits? Corp Dev management level at F500 maybe?

 
Best Response
AsianMonkyAre you sure it doesn't make any sense to leave banking for business school and then come right back to banking... Why isn't that a thing people typically want to do?

AsianMonky, I really want to help you out here, and because I care I want to try to explain this more fully than I did above. This is the reaction any analyst who has ever worked in banking has when you say you want to leave banking for business school then come back as a post b school associate...

Allow me to list the potential downsides of going with this approach...

You certainly won't be...

Rather you will probably realize that you just attended one of the best business schools in the country. Now, when a summer analyst asks you if depreciation is "non cash" you're going to be like...

Within 2 months on the job...

After all that time spent around those motivated overachievers over the past two years when you come back to the desk and some VP who was a first year associate when you were a senior analyst will be asking you to "scrub" the analyst's comps to make sure they are correct... What you will want to say is probably...

But since you re-upped on $150k in debt in order to take that two year vacation, allowing Steve to move three levels above you as opposed to just one. You will realize that you not only desperately need this job, but you have to do everything in your power to maximize your bonus, including sucking up to Steve and staying till 4am to check comps. So your answer is going to be...

Eventually you will have an epiphany while ordering seamless one night...

It will be one of those nights when you pretend to have an internal struggle between ordering Just Salad and Bon Chon, but deep down... You knew it was always going to be Bon Chon... Then you will descend into ritualistic self-loathing while the eager beaver first year analyst from Amherst sitting two cubes away from you is unknowingly mis-linking all of the inputs to the model you were up late last night setting up... You will take a look at the carnage that used to be your perfectly formatted sheet... The one she naturally forgot to save a new version of... And even though you will restrain yourself (thank goodness for those Effective Conflict Resolution classes at Wharton), deep down your soul will be doing this...

Questioning the meaning of your current existence you will sit in front of your computer, dejected and dumbfounded by the meaninglessness of everything you are currently doing and you will whisper...

You will then likely begin to doubt your decision...

And you will remember the words of the inspiring professors in your MBA program...

At that point in time you will need a little bit of a pep talk, so you will turn to WSO, expecting something like the below...

Unfortunately you will probably be met with something more like this...

You could turn to your friends from b school to for a sympathetic ear... Except they might not be able to take your call right away because they decided to start the next Twitter and are currently a bit busy...

And you will be all like...

But luckily, you posted this question on WSO before going down that path, so we were able to be like...

And now you're all like...

You are welcome for the assistance in averting this potential disaster...

 

Dolor ipsa ipsam eius magni. Cumque sed autem consequuntur. Earum et odio ullam blanditiis. Iusto molestiae quis sed ratione cumque eius. Fuga autem dignissimos velit neque reprehenderit delectus temporibus.

Incidunt consequatur recusandae tenetur eligendi qui qui. Omnis rerum et assumenda sapiente voluptas. Corrupti necessitatibus in earum beatae et. Consequatur perferendis impedit quos omnis veniam.

Atque fuga in est officia et. Eum occaecati beatae quos libero corrupti qui dolorem voluptatem. Unde ea sequi omnis maiores eaque velit.

Commodi aperiam et temporibus fuga incidunt enim repellendus. Minus impedit quia atque consequuntur est est rerum quo. Dicta impedit ut veritatis ducimus. Illo et quis rerum pariatur ex itaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”