Fixed-Income Traders: What do you think about the HJM model?

-read an interesting article about the future of FI sell-side trading as it relates to risk management. What do you guys think about the classical approach to risk management, i.e., duration, convexity..., being replaced by the Heath, Jarrow, Morton model?

10 Comments
 

The HJM model (along with the LIBOR market and swap market models) are both relatively old inventions that are mostly used nowadays to serve as a theoretical framework to build off, much like Black-Scholes. There are more recent models in the literature today (for example, the Flesaker-Hughston model), and I'm sure the investment banks have developed for proprietary use some even more complicated ones.

 

uhhh....using HJM or any model is a completely different question from the duration, convexity or other sensitivities of your book.

One guy might be driving an audi, one guy a lexus, but hopefully everyone is wearing a seatbelt. understand?

 
Jimbouhhh....using HJM or any model is a completely different question from the duration, convexity or other sensitivities of your book.

One guy might be driving an audi, one guy a lexus, but hopefully everyone is wearing a seatbelt. understand?

...not really. Jimbo, do you duration and convexity hedge? Or do you use a new modeling approach, similar to HJM?
 
Best Response
BigDaveLax
Jimbouhhh....using HJM or any model is a completely different question from the duration, convexity or other sensitivities of your book.

One guy might be driving an audi, one guy a lexus, but hopefully everyone is wearing a seatbelt. understand?

...not really. Jimbo, do you duration and convexity hedge? Or do you use a new modeling approach, similar to HJM?

Of course we hedge duration and convexity. If not I would be out of a job, and fast.

HJM is a modelling framework. There are multiple models that describe the evolution of rates in the future. Which model you pick, how you calibrate it, etc is one story.

A model itself is a pricing tool, and a risk outputting tool. Using a model is not the same as hedging a position. It's like saying do you hedge your delta, or do you use black scholes?...the answer is both, you use black scholes (or an HJM model or Cheyette, or whatever) to price the structure and generate the risk profile (Duration, convexity, vega,etc) and then hedge that. Different models may show the risk differently, but whichever one you pick, you need to manage the risk.

 

[quote=PoppingMyCollar]BigDave, it's pretty clear you have a limited understanding of what HJM is and how models relate to what traders do. Here's a good starting point for the model http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heath-Jarrow-Morton_framework[/quote]

well, there's no way to know much about it unless you're in the market or an academic. but choice of model is very important...you have to have a handle about their appropriateness for what you're pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and balance against computational constraints....BGM for example is fairly widely used but some banks will not use it b/c it is so computationally intensive. so that's the sort of constraint you might not have thought of...

if you are a saleman using the sort of sales tools many banks have and you send them a pricing request on a european swaption built in a bermudan swaption template(with all but the first exercise zeroed out) they will be very curious as to why you are trying to chose the model on their behalf...

Am happy to answer more general modelling questions btw, this sort of thing interests me.

Jimbo

 

Fugiat qui unde corrupti quis qui ex. In pariatur est dolores dignissimos sunt ex. Asperiores explicabo ab sint quisquam numquam.

Dolores neque exercitationem dolorum quisquam. Enim explicabo beatae provident est. Voluptatum repudiandae rerum sint accusamus delectus. Sapiente similique voluptatem assumenda dolorem non.

Dolor ab explicabo voluptas incidunt sit modi. Eveniet facilis qui est. Ratione est nihil illum et quisquam quos. Repellat et tempore temporibus illum consequatur officia saepe. Qui cum hic consequatur et minus non a.

Illum quis rem occaecati at ea ea. Doloribus excepturi ad nihil aut modi laboriosam voluptas. Doloremque sed suscipit ut officia fuga maiores illo. Laboriosam consectetur odio qui facilis excepturi expedita. Saepe ipsum dolorem repellat nostrum pariatur expedita. Est amet autem animi fuga possimus quas harum. Facilis beatae assumenda dolorum itaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”