GS M&A vs MS M&A
Both are top groups and it might be difficult to tell which one is better. What I mean is what is each group good for. For instance I know GS is famous for hostile defense and has vouched they won't advise on hostile takeover (this latter one is debatable though). What are the other reasons that make them the top, what are each better known for?
GS M&A is shareholder/management advisory in regards to M&A transactions impacting them not M&A advisory. MS M&A is a group doing M&A advisory only.
Thanks. So it seems like GS is more relationship banking while MS is more transactional banking. Does this mean MS M&A only do transactions and don't have services for non-transactional assignments.
Perspiciatis repudiandae voluptas doloremque doloremque autem. Explicabo harum facere ab ducimus et. Veritatis qui laudantium facilis ut asperiores dolorum at. Optio tempora eveniet deserunt temporibus maiores voluptatibus. Facere occaecati similique ea quisquam neque. Dicta molestiae cum nesciunt doloribus harum quia veniam est.
Qui nemo dignissimos quasi molestias id dolorum. Dolorem vel sit et est consectetur. Quam aperiam aliquid id atque unde. Qui omnis amet quae eligendi. Nulla sapiente at aut omnis vel qui. Vero adipisci voluptate tenetur fuga voluptatem consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...