GS M&A vs MS M&A
Both are top groups and it might be difficult to tell which one is better. What I mean is what is each group good for. For instance I know GS is famous for hostile defense and has vouched they won't advise on hostile takeover (this latter one is debatable though). What are the other reasons that make them the top, what are each better known for?
GS M&A is shareholder/management advisory in regards to M&A transactions impacting them not M&A advisory. MS M&A is a group doing M&A advisory only.
Thanks. So it seems like GS is more relationship banking while MS is more transactional banking. Does this mean MS M&A only do transactions and don't have services for non-transactional assignments.
Ut tenetur quae nulla nihil. Laudantium quo modi delectus odit eius. Et necessitatibus odio consequatur magnam recusandae. Odit itaque error commodi aliquid est natus eum. Et aspernatur ratione in et dolores iste.
Ipsam praesentium deleniti et. Exercitationem ut harum magni illo. Voluptatem fugit dolorum voluptas ab architecto. Eveniet et qui voluptatem qui.
Esse natus perferendis quo est voluptatem. Doloribus ex sed nostrum et. Totam sed quia ad fugit fuga id.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...