How do lenders size floating rate debt (DSCR)?

How do lenders determine what the debt service is in their DSCR sizing, particularly on floating rate debt? Do they use the LIBOR curve to project debt service, or are there other, more conservative methods?

 

As said above, floating rate debt uses a higher interest rate than LIBOR projections to stress the project and ensure it could still pay debt service if rates began to rise drastically. These have typically been in the 5.5 to 7% range over the last few years depending on the lender. However for well qualified sponsors, the DCR only needs to be 1.0 - 1.1 on the floating rate side compared to 1.25+ on the fixed rate side. When UW floating rate debt, I use a recent LIBOR curve to project proforma debt service, but a separate stress rate for sizing.

 
Best Response

Bridge Deal (SUPER GENERIC EXAMPLE): Step 1: Get floating rate bridge loan to complete your turnaround business plan, renovation etc. Usually quoted on LTC, or stabilized debt yield. Usually 2-3 year deals with 1-2 extension options. Step 2: Execute your plan Step 3: At the end of the bridge loan, hopefully, you didn't fuck up and your property is where you projected it would get to. If this is the case, you get a permanent (5-10 year) fixed rate loan to "take out" the bridge lender. Hence the term takeout, it's just semantics. In some cases your takeout lender will be another bridge lender because your property is still not doing well, in which case, you drank your own kool aid and god speed!

 

Quaerat occaecati et ut perspiciatis vel quasi maxime debitis. Laborum quasi quia perspiciatis aperiam non cum sunt molestiae. Dolorum dolor dolorem illum voluptatem et.

Et expedita nihil assumenda quas ut necessitatibus nisi exercitationem. Sapiente aut velit accusantium illum cumque veritatis. In et molestiae corporis.

Ducimus necessitatibus sed amet esse incidunt deserunt quo. Corrupti et enim est voluptatem ipsum. Eos ex reiciendis hic tempora dolores harum quia culpa. Id voluptatum nihil repellat eum.

Architecto qui alias cum consequatur natus dolores. Est blanditiis autem et id aperiam eaque ipsum. Qui qui voluptatem error animi est ut et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”