How Useful is an MBA Network for PE Recruiting Pre-MBA?

Hi folks, I recently got into Booth's Scholar Program (deferred enrollment) and had several questions.

  1. Are there any penalties if I accept now and reapply elsewhere after 2-4 years other than the lost deposit (I remember seeing somewhere that Wharton is very strict about this but I haven't read anything in Booth's admission criteria that explicitly forbids this)

  2. I am entering IB and want to transition to PE. I am thinking of leverage the Booth network for PE recruiting pre-MBA. How useful is the Booth network pre-MBA?

The way I look at it is I am basically paying the few k in deposit in exchange for having this on my resume and for its potential PE recruiting advantages via the network (should I decide to reapply or not get an MBA), thoughts on my thought process?

Thanks in advance for all your inputs. Stay safe.

 

congrats on getting admitted, i recently got the good news as well. Similar question to add on to yours already — recognizing that Booth is a great school but is not HSW, does it still make sense to have Booth on your resume for PE recruiting? i.e. not just when talking to Booth alumni, but in general

 

On (1) you'll have to look at specific school websites - in general, I think it's fine - it's a free country, and personal circumstances change - there's no way they can force you to go to Booth or bust. You'll lose the deposit for sure though.

(2) People might glance at your GMAT score (put it if it's 730+) - otherwise, probably not much help. Apart from maybe the Chicago based firms (MDP, GTCR), Booth doesn't really get any traction on either cost in post-MBA PE world (look at websites and see if you can find any Boothies).

If you do get an MBA, you should shoot for HBS/GSB if you are targeting post-MBA PE.

 

Trivial question, but you think 730 is the cutoff for a GMAT on the resume? Have heard 750+ is now the norm for high finance? For reference, I got a 740..

 

Congrats on the acceptance

1) I’d refrain from reneging and reapplying, but probably could get away with it. Risky accepting booth early when you could be more competitive for H/S down the road

2) This is a little blunt, but honest. I think Booth may hurt more than it helps on the resume if you are shooting for UMM/MF PE. Top firms place almost all of their associates (who want b school) into H/S/W. They won’t ding you for it, but committing to booth early may not be as attractive as you think for the top firms.

That being said, if you stick with booth, you could still try and network with any alum you see currently in PE and try to get a leg up that way.

 

Booth very clearly states on their website/admit portal that the Booth Scholars Program isn't binding. You won't be penalized (if that's even possible normally) for applying to other programs later.

"Booth may hurt more than it helps"--> the early acceptance is non-binding, so at the very least it's just a credible sign to PE firms that you were on top of your stuff and a top MBA program wanted you early.

 

If non-binding, then definitely worth keeping to hedge.

I stand by my opinion about not including it on the resume, though. Again, others may disagree, but I’m just letting you know the thoughts that I would have as someone at a UMM/MF who has played a role in recruiting.

If I saw booth deferred on the resume, my first thought would be, “Why was this candidate rejected from HBS, GSB, and Wharton?”

Risky proposition given that even if it’s viewed as a positive thing by a certain interviewer, the benefit will not be very material relative to the risk

 

You should know that these deferred enrollment application cycles are way, way more selective than regular cycles. They explicitly express preference for STEM majors and candidates from non-traditional backgrounds. Many top candidates from H/Y/P type schools with 3.8+ GPAs who are going into banking/consulting can't even get into Booth/MIT/Columbia, let alone H/S/W early.

I hope your associate counterparts at other UMM/MF firms aren't as uninformed about these early programs as you are

 

^ Would echo the above. Know a few incoming BB (JP/BAML/CS) FT analysts w/ 760's and 3.7+'s who only got into lower tier M7s (Sloan/Kellog).

Writing about wanting to do PE long-term in your essays is shooting yourself in the foot for these applications

 
Most Helpful

Well, I guess this is a perfect case study as to why, as stated, I’d recommend not including it on the resume.

You think the decision makers at these firms are tracking 2+2 criteria and acceptance rates for each schools? No. All they know is that we have a few juniors on our team who were HBS/GSB deferred admits.

So, once again... the risk isn’t worth it. Most seniors don’t know the details of these programs. They see Booth, and then wonder why you were rejected from HBS/GSB/Wharton when we have associates who were accepted to those 2+2 programs, and why (in their minds) you locked in that offer early.

Look, I’m not shitting on Booth. Great school. But I can tell you that at least my MF might have more questionable reactions than positive ones.

 

Congrats on the acceptance OP.

Do you mind sharing basic stats/background? I'm considering applying to these programs next year and it'd be helpful to see what accepted profiles typically look like.

 

Rerum dolor sapiente est id velit quia et. Ducimus doloribus est doloremque. Quo ipsum neque repellendus. Rerum sit minima molestiae non ut ad adipisci. Impedit ex vitae quia similique quisquam.

Aliquid ut eaque expedita. Illum voluptas exercitationem et quia. Est sed voluptatibus et perferendis quia rem. Veritatis id aut nobis.

Vero ipsam rerum aut omnis adipisci quos. Commodi dolorem commodi ut non maiores reprehenderit perspiciatis. Dolorem aut explicabo et neque tenetur distinctio. Sed ut corporis aperiam rerum unde.

Ut pariatur fugiat ipsam quo quia aut aut placeat. Vitae esse ut aspernatur iste illum est modi. Iste inventore ut porro excepturi officiis accusamus quaerat. Et sapiente perspiciatis et et nobis. Ab quia nihil dolores saepe iste.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”