IP ban the MAGA Warriors

@andylouis @Patrickcurtis

Not a hard decision. These are either Trump staffers or internet research agency employees getting paid 10 cents per comment. They will spam threads even if you ignore them with the same campaign slogans every time. Also, there seems to be no line in terms of what becomes hate speech. After all APAE has contributed, how do you think he would feel about every thread being spammed with "black lives matter is a terrorist organization comprised of violent thugs that need to be exterminated from society"? 

Same lines every time: Biden dementia, dem run cities allowing blacks to destroy america, radical socialists, DNC steal election not Trump, these things are straight copy pasting meaningless campaign slogans. Can also throw in a bunch of 16 year old "associate 2 in IBD"s telling everyone that their opinion is worthless, shut the fuck up intern, dumb lib just go kill yourself, and all that good stuff. 

This stuff is spam and hate that chases away your long time contributors. You stop new users from posting links, ban nigerian princes offering visas, and have banned guys like theaccountingmajor for a lot less. Just IP ban these guys - it's not a complicated decision. You're not shutting out conservative voices, because 4chan trolls are not conservative. 

 
Most Helpful

@andylouis @Patrickcurtis

Not a hard decision. These are either Trump staffers or internet research agency employees getting paid 10 cents per comment. They will spam threads even if you ignore them with the same campaign slogans every time. Also, there seems to be no line in terms of what becomes hate speech. After all APAE has contributed, how do you think he would feel about every thread being spammed with "black lives matter is a terrorist organization comprised of violent thugs that need to be exterminated from society"? 

Same lines every time: Biden dementia, dem run cities allowing blacks to destroy america, radical socialists, DNC steal election not Trump, these things are straight copy pasting meaningless campaign slogans. Can also throw in a bunch of 16 year old "associate 2 in IBD"s telling everyone that their opinion is worthless, shut the fuck up intern, dumb lib just go kill yourself, and all that good stuff. 

This stuff is spam and hate that chases away your long time contributors. You stop new users from posting links, ban nigerian princes offering visas, and have banned guys like theaccountingmajor for a lot less. Just IP ban these guys - it's not a complicated decision. You're not shutting out conservative voices, because 4chan trolls are not conservative. 

I love these "ban the people who disagree with me politically" threads, they're too perfect. Anyone else notice how it's ALWAYS younger (20-30 y/o assuming based on positions listed) left-leaning folks that do it? You're seriously claiming that anyone supporting Donald Trump on a finance forum has to be either 4chan, a Russian troll, or one of his staffers? The gut-wrenching irony is palpable.

A message to you and the rest of the snowflakes. This isn't the "safe space" you gestated in for 4 years at a liberal arts college. Your mommy isn't going to write a strongly worded letter to Patrick and convince him to shield your delicate sensibilities from opposing viewpoints. This is the Wall Street Mother Fucking Oasis my dude, where professionals from the real world come to contribute to the knowledge pool and shoot the shit. You're entitled to your opinion because this is America, but you don't get to censor other people's just because they trigger you. So put up or shut up, because if you're this whiny in your downtime god knows what you must be like to work with.

Have a glass of wine or scotch and enjoy your evening for Christ sake. God bless you.

          - a MAGA Warrior

p.s. toss monkey shit if you're a gigantic wuss

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.independent.co.uk%2Fs3fs-public%2Fthumbnails%2Fimage%2F2016%2F09%2F27%2F21%2Ftrump-pepe.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

Also,

Intern in Other

Seconded

Shut the fuck up Intern

"The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly" - Robert A. Wilson | "If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Colleges these days my man. Churning out more pussies than the BangBros fuck bus. I'm telling you, we gotta bring back Mutual Combat and these soyboys will become a thing of the past. Just gotta put together an app and convince Apple & Android make a default, and it keeps public count of all your fights + every time you refuse. If memory serves, you're a quant right? We have the technology. LET'S BUILD IT!

"The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly" - Robert A. Wilson | "If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

WTF? There is this thing called the Freedom of Speech. It means that no matter how dumb your opinion is, you have the right to voice it.

I'm a conservative leaning libertarian (ish) and I go around criticizing just about everyone and tearing down dumb arguments left and right. I'd like to see dumbasses go away, but I want that to happen as the result of dumbasses getting smarter. You can't just "cancel" people. That's pure oppression.

Let people figure out what opinions are shitty and what are good.

 

You assume that the "dumbasses" are here to have serious discussions. They are not. There is a very clear and easy to draw line between conservatives here to have genuine discussion, and MAGA warriors here to copy paste campaign slogans. 

Freedom of speech is reserved for government forums, not for companies like WSO. They can moderate the discussion however they want. Don't see why they can't moderate this spam like everything else. If they decide that APAE should not have to scroll through a bunch of comments on how blacks are destroying America, so be it. I don't really see that as suppressing opinions but to each their own.  

 

Turnaround098

bunch of comments on how blacks are destroying America

WTF? I don't think anyone has really ever claimed this.

On a serious note, I hate people who treat this like Twitter and just spew out nonsense to get attention. But honestly, what can we do? WSO is kind of a self selecting forum, highly educated people tend to be interested in finance, so on average the quality of discussions are much better than in say Twitter.

Now a lot of that has seem to have changed. Maybe because we're at a critical time in world history where people can't think straight when it comes to politics. Maybe it's bunch of fake accounts. 

For the latter, Patrick can just require everyone to verify their work or school emails. But we can't do much about the first. How do you know if someone's just spewing out nonsense or not? You actually have to read into it. Sometimes people make long winded posts, some are filled with BS, some are actually well written. Some posts are short, but still some are just BS and some are actually well written. It's hard to tell.

Also don't forget that there are plenty of liberal bigots on WSO as well. 

 

No, the dumbasses are here to make OPs like yours. You're technically right about Freedom of Speech being specifically for protection from the Government. But I think Patrick and Andy know that their allowance of it here is what keeps this site growing in popularity at a constant clip and not turning into a complete shithole like Reddit, Twitter, Facebook, etc.

APAE is a grown ass man with more important things to worry about that what trolls says on a forum. He's too busy finding himself a smart, driven, supermodel-looking wife or something. He knows he can waltz in whenever he so pleases and drop knowledge on this forum that thousands will eat like hot cakes. He doesn't need a 2nd year IB analyst front-running to shield him from mean words.

And for the record, while I haven't seen every comment on WSO, I'd bet no one is seriously claiming black people are destroying America. And even if they are, fuck them and move on there's no questions they're in the minority. If anything they're probably saying BLM is burning down the country, which by their own admission they will do unless they get what they want. I dunno man, sounds like terrorism to me when you threaten people and follow up with the use of intentional violence for political purposes. One of their biggest talking points is literally the destruction of the nuclear family (which they conveniently just pulled from their site), which dozens have studies have shown is one of the biggest contributors to and exacerbators of poverty, particularly among the black community, in the modern world. But keep clinging to your blatantly false talking point and acting like Trump supporters are somehow racist when their guy has the highest black and latino support of any Republican candidate in the last century.

"The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly" - Robert A. Wilson | "If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

wherethefisdonny

Now they are just whiny hall monitors

Yes.

that turn people in to the teacher for not wearing masks

Just wear a mask. It's basic hygiene and basic decency at this point. But yeah strangers who call you out in the public to wear masks are fucking annoying.

I was running once. I saw an elderly couple who briefly took off their masks because no one was around within 100 ft.  Some asshole on a bike comes along and shouts out "Masks on the faces!".

Another story while I was running. I have my mask on my chin when I'm not around others while running. Some woman who's like 10 feet away from me stares me down and gestures me to put on my mask. I mean WTF? I was socially distancing and I sure as hell wasn't breathing at her.

 

Milton Friedchickenman

wherethefisdonny

Now they are just whiny hall monitors

Yes.

that turn people in to the teacher for not wearing masks

Just wear a mask. It's basic hygiene and basic decency at this point. But yeah strangers who call you out in the public to wear masks are fucking annoying.

I was running once. I saw an elderly couple who briefly took off their masks because no one was around within 100 ft.  Some asshole on a bike comes along and shouts out "Masks on the faces!".

Another story while I was running. I have my mask on my chin when I'm not around others while running. Some woman who's like 10 feet away from me stares me down and gestures me to put on my mask. I mean WTF? I was socially distancing and I sure as hell wasn't breathing at her.

I'm talking more like, the ones that see a video of a wedding on TV and their first take away is "where were the masks! Omg...let's crucify them publicly"

I wear a mask in public..its polite.  I really don't care enough or get worked up about it like some people do.

 

Really? So anyone who disagrees with BLM and says that dem cities are overrun with crime is part of the Trump campaign and needs to be silenced? Grow tf up.

Edit: Btw the fact that people don’t get indiscriminately banned on this forum is what keeps me here instead of places like reddit, Twitter, or whatever other site you can think of. Please don’t mess up what’s good.

 

As one could easily tell from my post history, which I have because I'm not anonymous, I think anonymous posting should be removed in off topic (I am fine with it elsewhere so people can just ask questions without making an account). However, I don't support IP banning the hard dick MAGA people. They are allowed to voice their opinions wherever they want. I would rather them have a username so they'd be forced to stand by their comments, but it is what it is I guess.

Also to be fair, haven't seen @APAE on here in ages, but he definitely is one of the best and most informative posters on this site.

Dayman?
 

Never seen this coming. The side that relies on silencing and censorship requests.... more silencing and censorship. Cons really need to start thinking about making their own society without the lib oppressor.

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 

Mfw I see you comment

Obama look of disapproval | ಠ_ಠ Look of Disapproval | Know ...

"The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly" - Robert A. Wilson | "If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

The irony in this post is that while you accuse others of making intellectually dishonest campaign slogan remarks your post has 0 sources to back up what you are saying and makes broad sweeping generalizations. 

Array
 

This seems overly harsh.  How about just not letting people post anonymously?  Everyone has a right to be a bigot or an idiot or a troll, but by the same token everyone else has a right to judge them for it, and ignore their future comments accordingly.  Allowing people to spew nonsense and stupidity without even having to live it down in their (otherwise also anonymous) account handle is encouraging trolls, I agree.  If you aren't willing to say something on here that you wouldn't say to your boss, it shouldn't be said, and I agree any steps taken to bring those into alignment are good ones.  Just silencing anyone who doesn't agree isn't the right solution, no matter how dumb, ignorant, or prejudiced half the "conservative" teenagers sitting in their parents basement seem to be.

 

I agree with you.  I do not believe in censorship.  Aside from violating the rules on WSO or the law, a person should not be censored.  There are three solutions on the WSO platform to deal with people who do not share your opinions: MS, the down arrow. or discuss the issues.  

 

I disagree with the idea that every comment a person writes on this site that same person should feel comfortable saying in front of his or her boss. This isn't LinkedIn or Handshake. This is the off topic forum on a social media site. Many of the users use this place to blow some steam off after a long day at work (and for some long = 15/16 hours). It shouldn't be a surprise then that strong, blunt, and crude language gets tossed around. Obviously there are some comments that would raise alarm even in a friendly situation (serious death threats,psycopath behavior, etc.) but I'm pretty sure the site already monitors for that. There is a flag button on the bottom of each comment so extreme outliers can get reported. 

Array
 

IncomingIBDreject

I disagree with the idea that every comment a person writes on this site that same person should feel comfortable saying in front of his or her boss. This isn't LinkedIn or Handshake. This is the off topic forum on a social media site. Many of the users use this place to blow some steam off after a long day at work (and for some long = 15/16 hours). It shouldn't be a surprise then that strong, blunt, and crude language gets tossed around. Obviously there are some comments that would raise alarm even in a friendly situation (serious death threats,psycopath behavior, etc.) but I'm pretty sure the site already monitors for that. There is a flag button on the bottom of each comment so extreme outliers can get reported. 

Except this site isn't a place for you to "blow off steam."  It's supposed to be a place for advice and career support.  The Off Topic forum is supposed to be for discussion about things that don't fit into those categories.  No one cares if you drop a bunch of curse words in here, but if you want to start telling me that black people have less intelligence than white people or that there is a secret cabal of Jews running the world, you should expect to be judged and criticized in a commensurate manner.

Lets make something clear.  There are no "off the cuff" remarks on the internet.  You choose to write something, choose to post it, and are in every way an active participant in what you are saying.  There is agency there, so don't sit here and say you're just venting.  You're making a choice, and all choices come with consequences.  That's being an adult.  So either stand behind your comments or don't make them at all - no one is policing what you think, feel free to be the biggest asshole in the world inside the sanctuary of your own mind.  When you actively choose to put those thoughts into a public forum, you will and should be held accountable for them.  Your position is no different than some "snowflake" demanding a safe space with no trigger words or anything like that, who I suspect are the kind of people I'd find you ranting about in another thread.  

 

I am so confused, because there's a bunch of people here that actually take time to write serious responses that seem to be misunderstanding what I mean. There are trolls spamming crying libs wa wa bullying one liners on every politics thread whether you respond to them or not. These users don't post anything else. This is just spam, and should be treated like other spam. I mean I'm happy to block them just on my end if I could, but I feel like this can be done by WSO systematically very easily. 

If I went on every women in IB thread on WSO and responded to every comment with "this is a man's job, learn your place in the kitchen", would you say I should be allowed to continue to do so in the name of not silencing a different opinion? 

 

Est ipsa voluptas ut commodi quia vel. Ipsum qui quo accusantium soluta blanditiis et dolores aut.

Quo aliquid beatae a necessitatibus. Et eius sit pariatur optio voluptas aut. Est rerum dolore illo ut. Nostrum quod sit et minus. Commodi assumenda itaque amet omnis officiis quam fugiat.

Ab praesentium sed sed minus eveniet nesciunt aut nihil. Consequatur impedit et pariatur amet.

Enim quia voluptates nulla similique rerum in. Qui ducimus fugit blanditiis. Minus velit et qui velit amet quis est. Tempore aspernatur occaecati aut minima. Qui alias repudiandae dignissimos aut sint. Aliquam amet quia eos aut cum. A dolor ducimus sint voluptate aspernatur sed harum.

 

Rem dolores illum dignissimos consequuntur harum eos sint. Unde et dolorum hic earum et molestiae omnis. Necessitatibus mollitia alias aliquam asperiores cum in. Nisi vero dolorem provident aut fuga ea. Laborum magni error deleniti sed qui. Ullam nesciunt qui sequi autem praesentium sed quam explicabo.

Est eveniet excepturi sit ab eveniet. Molestiae sed consectetur ex et modi incidunt. Numquam dolores sunt cumque dolore quos fugit laboriosam.

Doloribus autem magnam nihil aut. Est aut architecto officiis dolore voluptatem non rerum architecto. At repellendus molestiae ducimus cumque debitis. Fugiat et rerum atque.

Repellendus iste non blanditiis iure. Consequatur rerum harum nostrum adipisci voluptates impedit officiis. Nihil sint aut facilis nam eum qui et ad. Necessitatibus est nemo assumenda est quia. Nobis maiores reprehenderit porro. Perferendis voluptas sunt magnam. Ipsa labore quasi in quo dolores ex quidem.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”