Inspired by that finance instagram post... When does a bank like Jefferies jump into the BB category over UBS/Deutsche? Pretty sure they are working more/bigger deals, obviously much stronger financially, and growing pretty quick. Do they need a stronger S&T team or something?
| +148 | AI Creating More Work | 44 | 1d |
| +146 | Senior Banker's Guide to IB Recruiting / Group Placement (with a Healthcare Bent) | 18 | 22h |
| +118 | Is pay at BofA really that bad? | 59 | 2h |
| +82 | Day at Macquarie | 11 | 2m |
| +44 | Is the life of a VP at a 'top-bank' really good? | 15 | 2d |
| +42 | How bad did I mess up | 10 | 5h |
| +30 | Misrepresented Houston IB | 14 | 10h |
| +29 | Law school instead of MBA for RX Banking | 6 | 3h |
| +29 | No BB RO 2026 | 10 | 1d |
| +26 | JPM SMALL CAP or WF/JEF/RBC Coverage group | 12 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Their average transaction is still ~$500 Million according to Bloomberg.
I think the last I saw, the lowest average transaction size by a BB was UBS at ~$1.2 Billion.
So no, not a BB.
Not sure this is a valid argument. If someone could pull the data for this, that would be awesome --> Jefferies probably does many more deals than UBS. What would be the average deal size if you pulled the largest X # of Jefferies deals, where X is the total number of UBS deals. If that average is larger than $1.2B, then this argument doesn't work.
That's not really how averages work...
League tables are a good proxy. Is Jefferies even Top 10 in any product e.g. M&A, equities in any region of the world? The top US banks (arguably the only real global BBs in my opinion), for example, are consistently Top 5 across multiple products in the majority of regions around the world. You tell me
Lol this is the truth tho
--
Cool
Jefferies is strong in leveraged finance, particularly when it comes to sponsor finance. They benefited heavily from Leveraged Lending guidance post-2013, as they were considered to be a non-bank and thus unregulated under the guidance. They have consistently placed well in this niche and have much looser credit appetite compared to the big money center banks, which has allowed them to compete for and win edgier deals.
jefferies is a primary dealer https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/primarydealers</a">https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/primarydealers
Thats like saying Lazard/PJT are BB no matter how good they are (on par with JPM/MS/GS if not better) they will always be an EB. Bulge brackets are global banks that have a full service system ranging from M&A to S&T. They also usually (not always) are able to land mandates because of their financing.
Also you might as well have said is "Lazard a BB" over Jefferies if you were going to pick one.
Pretty sure Lazard works on more/bigger deals, "obviously" stronger financially, have always been rock solid. Do they need a stronger S&T team or something?
But that's why I am asking. EB's mostly present themselves as "advice-only". Jefferies has a full-suite with a S&T team and a balance sheet which makes it more like a BB than an EB.
What about Tobin&Co?
Yeah I mean theyre so prestigious they dont even have to pay their analysts
Love all these salty kids who couldn’t break into a BB asking prestige whore questions. Fun fact: no one cares where you work, especially if it’s at a place like Jefferies
true, haha. but at the end of the day all we have as bankers is our money and prestige and we want to maximize that for ourselves.
You're going to want to break the obsession with prestige before it breaks you
I agreed. Think of guy like Sage Kelly (before the media stuff). Think he cared when he was pulling in cash when working at Jefferies? Thing he cares now making money at Cantor?
The BB prestige I feel is really just for people to go back home and tell their parents I work at BofA (which they know), opposed to Jefferies (which they probably don't know).
Hope you enjoy that mid tier BB
Absolutely, Jefferies can be a BB. If Jefferies wants to identify itself as a BB then that is what it is. I certainly have no right to judge or discriminate. Also: check your privilege.
This question is the equivalent of asking: Is X a target school? It has a great finance program and strong alum so why's it not in that bucket??
Let's rephrase this question into a different way:
Would a recruiter view my analyst experience at Jefferies equal to, if not better than a comparable analyst at UBS/DB?
The truth is that it really depends. People can believe this or not but surface level brand and prestige DOES MATTER in first impression of skill and intelligence. It's in human nature to use shortcuts to make conclusions. Why do you think consultants love recruiting M7 MBA's? School prestige = higher perceived worth and justification for high billable hours.
There are people who understand that an analyst's job is the same across any bank and puts Jeffries in the same bucket as the BB's. There are others who perceive BB as a fixed tier of its own. It all depends on the person's personal interactions and experience with Jeffries relative to the other banks.
Interestingly, as my career has continued to develop, I've been more convinced over time that perceived prestige is quite important. Important people have little time to distribute freely and will use shortcuts to determine who is worth talking/connecting with. You'll need an actual track record to back up what you're fronting but it's a better problem to have than not having a door open to you in the first place.
I’d forgotten how much I love these threads.
Hunting for clout
Earum numquam modi deserunt labore et. Deleniti aut odio quae.
Eum animi aperiam et est sint porro nihil. Consequatur qui corporis sunt qui temporibus. Et laborum et minima itaque delectus rerum ut. Soluta est dolorum dolorem.
Aspernatur fuga sapiente incidunt labore at. Rerum sint sit corrupti ipsum quod. Voluptate qui deleniti quo voluptatem officia. Facilis velit eius iure et animi nulla. Id cum ut quis placeat laudantium velit.
Est recusandae non cumque voluptatem. Aut exercitationem est quibusdam qui. Similique quibusdam ullam itaque veritatis consequatur blanditiis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Et maxime ipsam eos debitis. Corporis vitae asperiores molestiae enim. Inventore beatae dolorem delectus commodi perspiciatis officia id. Inventore sit omnis nostrum voluptatem occaecati aut odit.
Eveniet reiciendis illo dolores totam eum fugit eius. Eum recusandae amet vel recusandae. Eos vitae aut sit expedita amet ipsum. Rerum quibusdam reprehenderit id cumque neque. Ut nostrum sed tempora cumque qui minus.
A est sunt laudantium modi. Dolor voluptatibus blanditiis ut quis non atque sit porro. In aut mollitia magnam occaecati. Beatae eum sit accusantium a. Officia quis non quia qui magni eum ullam. Ea natus repellendus impedit atque rem.
Pariatur velit autem magnam dolores architecto. Praesentium earum doloribus ex quae odit. Velit nesciunt repellat eos earum iste aut repellat.