Law School vs Masters in Finance
Hello my Fellow Monkeys,
Currently a non-target Accounting Major and have accepted the fact that I will not land a Finance job, thus marks the reason why I have chosen job security instead, pursuing Accounting. However, my school has a Law School and a Master's in Finance program.
If I pursue Law School, I may able to enter the field of Tax Law and if I pursue my master's in Finance, I would be able to be an Actuary and work in Risk Management (have you seen Margin Call? Lol). Although it is not Investment Banking, it is still pretty attractive.
I am torn between the two, and if you were me, which path would you take? I'd like input from my fellow monkeys. Thanks all.
I know someone who did Law school --> Risk Management. Wouldn't really recommend it, it sounded like boring work honestly. A lot of front office employees also see you as an annoyance.
Aware that all-in comp was around ~130-140K starting (got hired on as an analyst). 50-60 hour work weeks were the norm.
Former corporate lawyer here. Do the masters. Less time in school, fewer hours of study, more useful material, cooler exit ops. Law sucks in every way. Taking questions.
I know your comment was a while back but I may as well try. First of all if I understand correct big law is corporate law? or a subsection of it in certain locations? Anyway, Im considering going to law school (in europe so keep that in mind) but everywhere all I see is how lawyers are miserable and wish they did something else but I dont really understand whats so different about law from other similar corporate professions? For example M&A lawyers, isnt that the same thing as M&A investment bankers except instead of numbers ur looking at letters, drafting at the junior levels, delegating and finalizing contracts at mid levels and at senior levels ur mostly a delegator and salesman while occasionally approving drafts. Sure investment banking isnt exactly known for its happy employees either but it sounds like law is another level of misery, so my question is: Is it really true and what are the contributing factors?
LOL OP you're so misinformed that I can't tell if this is a troll post
Law School - Law school is 3 years, intense, and only people from the top law schools and great grades get good jobs. A non-target law school will guarantee you more debt, 3 years of opportunity cost, and bleak job opportunities.
Master of Finance - Same as law school. Masters of Finance from a non-target will get you nothing but extra debt.
Are you 100% sure you want to be an actuary? How many mathematics and statistics classes have you taken? I think you're already able to take one of the actuarial exams. Give that exam a try and see how you like it. Life as an actuary is not for the faint of heart; you'll have to study for 4-5+ years while balancing your full-time job in order to pass really hard exams. Your job will also require you to pass them. In some firms, failing exams hold you back from progressing, and may even lead to getting fired.
To me it sounds like you don't know what you want, which is why I URGE you not to rush into enrolling in another educational program. Instead, find any finance job, even if it's an operations role. Hopefully, you'll have work-life balance, and you can use that time to study hard for the gmat or learn useful skills that will help you in getting the job that you want. Just passing CFA Level 1 will help in getting analytical jobs because employers will assume you have some base fundamentals/work-ethic.
You already have one non-target degree, do not waste any more time/money on non-target degrees. Any degrees moving forward should be brand-name schools. Taking 1-2 years to ace a gmat in order to enroll into a top-tier school is much better than attending a non-target program.
I understand when you say that you don't know what you want, but I might as well spend money on a non-target degree because I need to pass the CPA Exam which requires 150 cr. and can't afford target degree tuition. I currently work while in school (I'm a non-traditional student) and I believe that becoming an Actuary is the only way to "make it" in my situation. I really appreciate your input and have put some of it into consideration.
I see what you mean when you ask me to find a finance job. Maybe that may be the breakthrough that I need. If done properly, I might be able to be accepted into Michigan Ross. I come from that much of a non-target. So I have two avenues, either the actuarial route, or the Finance -> MBA route. Thanks for the advice. I really appreciate it.
Impedit necessitatibus maxime quia veritatis cumque ut quod. Culpa qui natus accusantium fuga perspiciatis sed. Voluptas esse et sint. In reiciendis modi eligendi culpa aliquam rerum. At laboriosam et voluptas nemo reprehenderit recusandae voluptas. Iste quo soluta nesciunt libero odio aut earum.
Maxime explicabo qui dolorem aliquid velit nihil aut. Sapiente eum accusamus adipisci aut nihil quia. Magnam praesentium occaecati ipsam. Perspiciatis quia voluptatum cumque qui. Nihil quia et ut id quisquam hic tempora.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...