M&A Models from Scratch

What is the best way to learn to build these models from scratch? People have told me to find a template and re-build it over and over, but no two deals are the same. I want to be able to understand fee structures and build a foundation that I can apply to any other deal.

I have also considered finding 2 companies and trying to build the model but I will never know if it's right/what I'm doing wrong.

Is there a website that helps with this? I already tried Macabacus.

 
Best Response

People have a tendency to overcomplicate merger models, and template examples on the Internet are also very complex in order to generalize and cover every esoteric contingency there is. It is difficult to build a general M&A model because every company, every capital structure, etc. can be wildly different, which means most generalized models are too long, too complex and too cumbersome for most actual investment banks in practice, especially during live deal situations.

The bulge bracket bank I worked at had this ridiculous general M&A model that we used for pitches. The thing was probably 5 megs with nothing in it, which is unacceptable. My FactSet would crash ~40% of the time when I opened it. I then worked for an EB where models were extremely streamlined, fast, and (in my opinion) far better. But they were custom-built for each situation. I now also create custom models for each situation on the buyside.

Assuming you have a solid foundation in corporate finance (e.g. can build a DCF), there are really only two things to keep in mind when you're building an M&A model from scratch:

What's the objective? Most times, it's public buyer accretion/dilution, but this can vary (for example, if you're modeling a private-public acquisition and trying to see how this will impact your returns)

The ONLY thing that matters in each line item is "how does this impact the pro forma math?" In other words, if you're trying to determine public buyer accretion/dilution, every line can be intuitively deduced with the question of "how is this impacting accretion/dilution"?

Your pro forma items (PF revenue, EBITDA, etc.) are just acquirer + target, add synergies if you want to include those assumptions (for your first model, just make it simple and don't add any. Or just add 10% of sales if you desperately want to). Operating line items (GP, EBITDA, EBIT) are a little bit trickier - there are companies that report EBITDA differently (for example, pre- or post-stock based compensation expense, since EBITDA is a non-GAAP metric), so you'll want to make sure your target metrics have been adjusted to conform to buyer methodology (if your buyer is pre-SBC, you should adjust your target to be pre-SBC, as everything in your model should conform to the buyer's perspective). But again - just simple addition (buyer EBITDA + target EBITDA (conformed to buyer reporting methodology) + synergies = pro forma EBITDA).

When you get to non-GAAP EBIT, you should net out non-GAAP adjustments to arrive at GAAP EBIT (check your acquirer's and target's 10Ks and 8Ks to see definitions - for tech companies, this mostly amounts to whether or not companies add back stock-based compensation and amortization of intangibles). This way you can take out interest and arrive at a GAAP pre-tax income, which you can use to figure out GAAP taxes.

Your interest expense is the pro forma interest expense. People go overboard on this line item in particular but you should make it as simple as possible. What's the acquirer's existing capital structure? How is the acquisition being financed? What's the go-forward capital structure post-transaction? When you're building your first model, please don't go through the effort of creating multiple new tranches of debt (for example, this many turns of senior debt and that many turns of mezz, etc.) - that's overcomplicated. Just throw on a single new illustrative tranche of debt with no early prepayment (therefore you don't have to model optional repayments) at 5% interest and call it a day. You can add complexities as your modeling skills mature. If you don't yet know how to build an LBO model, just take existing interest expense, keep it constant and layer on the interest expense from new debt. I know that's a shortcut, but the cash flow waterfall down through debt paydown requires the most work, so avoid if you want to get a general idea of how to build an M&A model before getting more advanced technical skills. That's pro forma interest.

Take out taxes. Just use the buyer's tax rate, and assume the historical tax rate remains consistent, and (for your first model) pick a company that is profitable and pays normal taxes. Or just use 35% as an assumption. Please don't pick a company with NOLs, as that will just trip you up.

Now you have GAAP net income. Here's a tricky part - add back tax-affected non-GAAP adjustments. You should have the numbers you used to go from non-GAAP to GAAP EBIT (you subtracted them, remember?), just add them back, but post-taxation (multiply by 1 minus the tax rate).

Now you have non-GAAP net income. Divide by pro forma shares outstanding (did you issue shares to pay for the transaction?) and voila, you have PF EPS and accretion/dilution.

There's a reason a lot of banks will ask for paper accretion/dilution models in interviews. They're not difficult. You can even just start with EBIT, layer in the pro forma capital structure using some fake assumptions and arrive at an acc/dil result.

By far the most complex portion of a "full" M&A model is the debt paydown, which requires a more fundamental understanding of cash flow. Honestly, in that case, you should learn to build an LBO model before tackling this.

Again, even with LBOs - start with the very basic fundamental skeleton of a model just to understand how everything flows before adding complexity. When adding features, just ask yourself "how does this flow through?" and you'll be alright.

I know the above is convoluted and long and confusing, so if you have questions I'd be happy to answer PMs. Also feel free to send me an initial model (if you think it's too bad to send, trust me I've seen worse so don't worry about that) and I can review.

 

Wow thank you so much for writing this up. I really appreciate it and will give it a shot. I am sure this will help many others on this site as well, as I wasn't able to find anything this detailed in my search. Everything makes sense for now but I'll definitely PM you with any questions and the model.

And yeah most templates I've come across on the internet are very complex. I tried just re-building on my own but there's just so many line items and nuances that are hard to spend hours re-building/understanding if I probably will not use them as an SA/junior banker. Do you think the M&A course on WSP is worth it for these purposes or is that overcomplicating it/an unnecessary expense?

 

I think financial modeling courses are valuable for lots of reasons aside from templates, and that they're not really valuable if you don't intend to go through the process of watching the tutorials (and learn the necessary prerequisite topics) in sequence. If the intention is to start at the model and try to figure it out, then most likely even the course-provided models are going to look too complex.

I'll send you a quick model I just built from scratch, should give you a starting point to at least see what it looks like. Let me know if you have any questions.

 
7xEBITDA:

There's a reason a lot of banks will ask for paper accretion/dilution models in interviews. They're not difficult. You can even just start with EBIT, layer in the pro forma capital structure using some fake assumptions and arrive at an acc/dil result.

Can you please elaborate how exactly to do this? Thank you.

 

Sorry for the late response. Here's how:

Pro forma (PF) EBIT = EBIT from Acquirer + EBIT from Target + Synergies PF Interest Expense = Acquirer Interest Expense Pre-Transaction + Interest Expense of New Debt from Transaction (if any). This line item requires a debt paydown model to project over time, although it can be as simple as Interest Rate x Total Debt for back-of-the-envelope calcs. PF Tax Expense = Acquirer Tax Rate x PF Pre-Tax Income

Then you have net income. To figure out accretion/dilution, divide net income by the PF shares outstanding.

The only real input in this process that is not immediately obvious is the debt vs. equity mix (which will determine your interest expense and PF shares outstanding).

Here's an example:

Acquirer

  • Acquirer EBIT = 100
  • Acquirer Existing Debt = 200, Interest Rate = 5%
  • Acquirer Tax Rate = 40%
  • Acquirer Diluted Share Count = 100
  • Acquirer Current EPS = (100 - 200(0.05))(1-0.4)/100 = 0.54
  • Acquirer Share Price = $10

Target

  • Target EBIT = 50
  • Synergies = 10
  • Target is acquired for 10x EBIT, or 500, with 50% stock and 50% cash (paid for with 250 of new debt at 10% interest)

Pro Forma Math:

  1. PF EBIT = 100 + 50 + 10 = 160
  2. PF Interest = 10 [calc: 200 * 5% = 10] + 25 [calc: 250 * 10% = 25] = 35
  3. PF Pre-Tax Income = PF EBIT - PF Interest = 160 - 35 = 125
  4. PF Net Income = 125 * (1 - 40%) = 75
  5. PF Diluted Shares = 100 + 25 [calc: 250 / 10 = 25] = 125
  6. PF EPS = 75 / 125 = 0.60, +11% accretion vs. 0.54 standalone EPS [calculated as 0.60/0.54 - 1]

Hope this is helpful!

 

At consectetur ipsam rerum explicabo aut eveniet. Sunt voluptas natus reiciendis similique ut reiciendis. Magni voluptatem ullam reiciendis. Incidunt distinctio illum totam quidem non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”