Need to prep for RE PE funds that buy operating companies and securities (in addition to real estate assets)

Hey guys,

I am an MBA student who spent the past two years working for a real estate PE fund that focused on buying individual real estate assets and portfolios. Some of the larger RE PE shops not only look at assets, but also look at purchasing whole real estate companies (more of traditional corporate PE) as well as real estate securities (kind of like RE focused hedge fund work).

Does anybody have any recommendation on how to brush up on those two skills? I feel like the investment management preps from WSO or TTS will probably be too granular for the securities portion, and the general PE preps will be too granular for the operating companies portion.

Appreciate any advice.

 

The BIWS real estate course has a case study of AVB. You could, in theory, rejigger that piece to an lbo model.

How each shop views this can be very different. Some groups with large real estate teams will just value the real estate (asset by asset) others will keep it more broad strokes on looking at corporate level financials. For the first option, try and put together an asset by asset roll up model then build off of that.

I'm by no means an expert on any of this so if someone else wants to chime in and provide guidance, I'd be interested as well.

 
Best Response

I'd think about it three ways - the technical metrics, corporate strategy, and the landscape.

Metrics are pretty much the same down to noi as with individual properties/portfolios. However, on the rev side, a REIT or re opco has more room to optimize revenue and set pricing strategy through rev mgmt. Likewise, on the expense side, there's more room to minimize through procurement (economies of scale). Below Noi, things get different. Corp g&a matters in a re company, so ppl typically go down to adj ebitda to capture it. Also know core ffo and affo, and why they are important. Note, unlike noi or ebitda, ffo includes interest expense, which is a very real cost for a company. Also, ppl will pay a lot of attention to the balance sheet. Total leverage ratio and net debt to adj ebitda (fwd and trailing) are the big ones.

For the above, I'd suggest looking through green street advisors definitions, which includes a ton of important granularity and is available online.

Qualitatively, when investing in companies you need to have a strong view on the competitive niche/strategy. What geographies are they in? What quality of asset? Do they do development? Are they transitioning from one focus to another? The ppl who invest in re securities are very risk avoidant and like simple strategies, hate development, and advocate formulaic approaches to capital allocation.

Know what companies are the major players in an industry and how they trade relative to each other - implied cap rate (nominal and economic), ffo multiple, affo multiple. Who's the best in class mgmt? Read some research reports and you should get the idea.

Really important for you will be to understand the current state of the public market vs the private - BC that's a lot of the arbitrage the big pe firms exploit. Easy thing to do is read up on what BX has done and the strategies they employ. Follow through the years - companies like Hilton, Brixmor, Equity office. There are some different approaches they will employ based on the situation.

I know this kind of rambles and leaves a lot out. It's a big topic that ppls entire careers focus on (including mine), so it's difficult to hit everything. But basically, read green street metrics, look at research reports, read old news articles. You can even build a company model, but I might not prioritize that. As Jim Rome says, just have a take and don't suck.

Edit: in metrics, I forgot to mention NAV - which is a huge omission. Green street definitions can be found here: GSA definitions

 

Ut voluptas molestiae ut occaecati. Repudiandae quos iusto molestias maiores voluptas et. Libero quas odio occaecati labore ut facere.

Voluptas quia tempore tempore vero saepe id. Et iste rerum aliquid harum sapiente deleniti est. Alias quo harum voluptas explicabo suscipit.

Voluptatibus vero autem quidem labore nesciunt corrupti. Mollitia delectus doloremque nesciunt. Asperiores est voluptas ab doloremque. Delectus deleniti accusamus nihil corrupti.

Ea quam iure iure sunt impedit non. Deleniti optio error nihil eligendi. Et quas repudiandae deserunt praesentium possimus modi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”