7 Comments
 

If Net PPE (i.e., PPE less accumulated depreciation) is down it could just mean that the firm is not replacing old assets that are are depreciating. That is, total PPE is stagnant and accumulated depreciation grows. Eventually the company will need to ramp up capex to replace these assets and this will be a very large chunky cash expenditure. If gross PPE (PPE before accumulated depreciation) is down it is more likely the firm has sold assets.

 
Im not very creativeI have run across this a couple of times in my brief financial modeling career. I have hypothesized that it would be attributable to positive synergies while keeping production costs and selling & admin expenses at the same proportion of new sales.

Say what?

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 
duffmt6
Im not very creativeI have run across this a couple of times in my brief financial modeling career. I have hypothesized that it would be attributable to positive synergies while keeping production costs and selling & admin expenses at the same proportion of new sales.

Say what?

I think he's saying Net PPE can stay down indefinitely (with no future capex outlay to replace old PPE) if synergies or efficiencies mean you can get more sales out of less equipment.
 

For most modeling purposes, it just simply means that the capitalized capital expenditures didn't match the depreciation. If you wanted to go further into the accounting, you can check if they're just not capitalizing capex (turning their expenditures into assets) and are planning to depreciate the expenses over a period of time.

The other option was is to just simply expense out their capital expenditures on the income statement, might be useful to check the statement of cash flows or income statement to see if this is the case.

 
Best Response

Qui aliquid quam aliquam delectus et. Ut provident quisquam est ut fugiat. Numquam nihil placeat odit ut. Reiciendis modi in omnis accusamus maxime deleniti. Alias nesciunt iusto velit debitis sint. Consequatur temporibus accusantium dolor sint laborum ut repellat.

Voluptatem quasi est libero quibusdam qui voluptas. Mollitia et eos eum sit quis. Hic velit quia laudantium.

Matan Feldman Founder, Wall Street Prep Learn Financial Modeling

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”