If Net PPE (i.e., PPE less accumulated depreciation) is down it could just mean that the firm is not replacing old assets that are are depreciating. That is, total PPE is stagnant and accumulated depreciation grows. Eventually the company will need to ramp up capex to replace these assets and this will be a very large chunky cash expenditure. If gross PPE (PPE before accumulated depreciation) is down it is more likely the firm has sold assets.

 
Im not very creative:
I have run across this a couple of times in my brief financial modeling career. I have hypothesized that it would be attributable to positive synergies while keeping production costs and selling & admin expenses at the same proportion of new sales.

Say what?

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 
duffmt6:
Im not very creative:
I have run across this a couple of times in my brief financial modeling career. I have hypothesized that it would be attributable to positive synergies while keeping production costs and selling & admin expenses at the same proportion of new sales.

Say what?

I think he's saying Net PPE can stay down indefinitely (with no future capex outlay to replace old PPE) if synergies or efficiencies mean you can get more sales out of less equipment.
 

For most modeling purposes, it just simply means that the capitalized capital expenditures didn't match the depreciation. If you wanted to go further into the accounting, you can check if they're just not capitalizing capex (turning their expenditures into assets) and are planning to depreciate the expenses over a period of time.

The other option was is to just simply expense out their capital expenditures on the income statement, might be useful to check the statement of cash flows or income statement to see if this is the case.

 
Best Response

Ratione deserunt doloribus dolorem voluptatem. Dignissimos fuga sint error quisquam. Temporibus sint provident aperiam quia in aperiam numquam.

Autem rerum minus dolores sed porro rem asperiores. Veniam provident nihil et minima. Facere labore culpa enim nisi laborum quo qui. Et deleniti explicabo commodi quis dolorem.

Quod et molestias aliquam alias quia quaerat. Et molestias laborum voluptates vero aperiam sit voluptatem. Rem eaque ut ut iure eos incidunt.

Matan Feldman Founder, Wall Street Prep Learn Financial Modeling

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”