Paulson in the Hot Seat -- Again

In a case of some correctly-aimed scapegoating, Stutterin' Hank has some 'splaining to do. Like, for example maybe, why he allowed the Treasury to pay a 44% across the board premium on TARP companies:

http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/articl…

Another sticky wicket might be why he brought on so much talent from his TARP buddies:


Separately, Treasury under Mr. Paulson hired a number of employees from banks that were receiving funds under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, creating “incestuous” relationships and potential conflicts of interest, Mr. Shelby said.

So far, Hank is stonewalling. He refused to answer dozens of questions posed by the Congressional Budget Office during their TARP audit. Naturally, as the new report is released tomorrow, his response to it thus far has been, "No Comment."

Maybe a subpoena will get him talking.

 

Paulson did what he had to do with a horribly under-educated and financially ignorant congress. The simple fact is that the government was and is not a profit seeking entity and to make that jump is simply wrong. Initially all the furor was about overpaying for the actual underlying assets (which was actually the only way to prevent further writedowns). They changed that and now the complaint is that certain investors will receive greater returns than the government.

Simply, either you help out the system or you gauge it and create a nationalized monstrosity that Marcy Kaptur can now have a say in. Screw the politicians and understand that Paulson did what he had to do to recapitalize banks to avoid runs. Also, if you dont hire industry men who are you goint to hire? The guys would couldnt make it in private industry and work for government desks?

 

Spinaltap... Congress acknowledges their ignorance of the financial markets. Thats why they gave the TARP responsibility to Wall Street veteran and former GS CEO, Paulson. He clearly exhibited nothing but ineptitude. I would have rather seen that $350b spent on hookers and crystal meth at the next Republican National Convention.

There are a few blatant demonstrations of ineptitude and downeight shadiness.

1- the Indian ex-Goldman Mini-me Paulson is the best person he could find the run the TARP program? Are you effing kidding me? The guy has ZERO accountability. Have you heard his comments during congressional hearings?

2- I find it suspect that Paulson started pushing for a TARP fund hardest when Goldman and Morgan Stanley were on the bring of collapse. I definitely think he would have done anything/everything to prevent Goldman from going down. I don't think they were financially in that position, but with the market betting against you, it doesn't matter what position you're in.

3- Its apparent that the distribution of TARP funds to healthy institutions did NOTHING to quell the "stigma" associated with needing Uncle Sam to bail you out nor did it do anything to thaw the credit markets.

While at Goldman, Paulson was one of the Wall Street execs pressuring the SEC to ease up on net capital requirements... which is one of the principal reasons banks were able to take on such huge amounts of risk and leverage themselves up the way they had.

Paulson was a key factor in creating this perfect storm. The fact that TARP was handed to him to "fix" the problem he essentially caused is ridiculous.

TARP has been a gigantic failure from day 1.

 

I agree Marcus that Paulson did not accomplish really any task set before him: the banks he attempted to recapitalize are still distressed, the credit markets frozen (kind of...) etc. BUT you have to agree that he had to work under the often obstinant and agressive hand of congress (I realize that is his job and the nature of the process) which politicized everything.

I think if he did not have to pretend to be strict and not giving out handouts (which is what is really needed) he would have simply bought up $700B of these assets at par allowed the banks to recover those losses and ended this thing before it started (what $1T in subprime, $3T in all questionable mortgages including alt a?)

The reason I berate congress aside from idiots like Marcy Kaptur is because the prevailing sentiment at the time this whole thing was climaxing (Sep, Oct, Nov) when talk of buying the assets was brought up people still argued to buy them at the discounted bid values which would have done nothing but effectively cemented the terrible situation

really, moratorium on FASB 157 and the world stops melting

 

Spintap, Congress would shit all over Paulson if they could. He did absolutely none of what he had promised in order to get a $700B check. All those old fucks kept crying about is how he mislead them and now that he has the money he's doing what he wants with it. In reality, he didn't really know what the hell to do with it. His strategy and methodology was so haphazard and disjointly. Every day they had a new plan.

 

I wonder why not more of a stink was made of the fact that Paulson started crying the alarms of global financial meltdown only when the shit was about to reach Goldman's doorsteps? Goldman had $20 Billion of toxic AIG debt on its books and would have gone down if not for Paulson showering them with money. Way too many Goldman alums were in Treasury doling out money to their cronies.

Kashkari was just a puppet for Paulson. BTW, not a bad guy. I went to high school with him at Western Reserve Academy and remember him as someone of above average intelligence who was hard working. Speaking of which, what business does Geitner have running Tresury? The guy (proudly!) admitted he's never taken an econ class before! I'd rather have my b-school macro professor in there than him!

 

The goal of TARP was not to turn a profit. It was to stabilize the financial system and credit markets. The reason the govt got shitty deals on their investments was because they had little time to act and they forced targets to accept the money. The important part was that the money get into the banks immediatly; return on the money was not an objective and should not have been.

Second guessing someone who made some fast decisions in a crisis situation is bullshit. You should all sit down and stfu and be thankful to the guy who most likely saved your jobs. This is akin to assholes trying to sue the fireman for breaking their finger as he rushed them out the burning building and saved their life. Was it possible that he could've done a better job? Yes. But it's not a situation to attack him over. He did the best he could and he accomplished his goal; nit-picking the details is pathetic.

The important thing is that the financial system was saved and he did not make matters worse in the process.

 
Best Response
sbmerchant:
The goal of TARP was not to turn a profit. It was to stabilize the financial system and credit markets. The reason the govt got shitty deals on their investments was because they had little time to act and they forced targets to accept the money. The important part was that the money get into the banks immediatly; return on the money was not an objective and should not have been.

Second guessing someone who made some fast decisions in a crisis situation is bullshit. You should all sit down and stfu and be thankful to the guy who most likely saved your jobs. This is akin to assholes trying to sue the fireman for breaking their finger as he rushed them out the burning building and saved their life. Was it possible that he could've done a better job? Yes. But it's not a situation to attack him over. He did the best he could and he accomplished his goal; nit-picking the details is pathetic.

The important thing is that the financial system was saved and he did not make matters worse in the process.

Kool-Aid much???

In case you haven't noticed, TARP is basically the failure everyone against it predicted it would be. The credit markets are still frozen, banks are going under EVERY DAY, and the greedy pigs in DC are going back to the trough for another TRILLION FUCKING DOLLARS. Yeah, that Paulson really saved our bacon!

Wake up.

 

Impedit modi reiciendis enim incidunt. Nulla in quam soluta fugit asperiores quasi. Maiores ut temporibus iusto ipsa tenetur iste. Maxime fugiat ipsa vel possimus vitae. Vero culpa repudiandae et ea omnis illum voluptatibus. Similique quia quo debitis natus sit rerum.

Optio sed magnam omnis ullam. Vel sint inventore a dolorem nobis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (89) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”