PE interviews LBO modelling test - should I always add a liquidity revolver even if not being specified in the instructions?

Hello everyone,

I am currently preparing for a few upcoming PE-interviews and I have a question concerning the LBO modelling tests you typically do in the second round ("standard" 90-120 minute test, building model from completely blank spreadsheet).

When creating the debt schedules, should I always add a liquidity facility covering eventual liquidity shortfalls stemming from e.g. operating cash flows, interest payments and mandatory repayments even if this has not been specified in the test instructions? E.g. it is specified in the test that an acquisition facility and term loan [x], [y] were raised to fund this acquisition but nothing more. Would you recommend me to include a liquidity facility based on above-mentioned reason because this would reflect reality better?

Just conscious that this would demand even more time, and will also add to the numbers of assumptions that will get scrutinised.

I am fairly certain my question has not been addressed by the other PE interview LBO modelling test threads here on WSO. Apologies if it has!

Thank you all,

F1_button

---Message from WSO Below---

6 Comments
 
 

I would add this in if I were you for the sake of completeness and don’t think this would take too much incremental time to add in. But don’t think it’s necessary.. for the vast majority of these one pager models, there should be no reason that liquidity / cash gen dips so low during the projection period that a draw from revolver becomes necessary. If such a draw is projected to be necessary, I would tweak other operating assumptions in the model such that FCF from the business fully supports / satisfies the business’ liquidity needs and/or fund cash to B/S at close such that a revolver draw is not necessary.

 
Most Helpful

Being on the other side of the table, here is my advice: - Make sure your model is spot on (i.e. you don't forget to add back the interests to your P&L... ) - Make sure everything is tidy and well formatted - Even more important, triple check your results and add sensitivity tables

You wouldn't believe the number of candidates you can't get an LBO model right, partly because they are stressed and also because they always use models... If I were you, I would make sure everything is right instead of impressing your interviewer. Don't forget the LBO test is just a tick in the box, nothing more, nothing less.

So if you are confident you have nailed the test, you can always add a revolver line at the end in 2'. But again, if you have a RCF but can't even get your assumptions right, you are just going to look stupid and get penalised for that. In some cases it's better to do the job perfectly well, rather than go the extra mile and make mistakes because you don't have enough time.

Hope it helps. Camondo

 

Ab facilis delectus voluptas fugit ducimus quia. Repudiandae dolor ea voluptatibus excepturi quaerat.

Inventore iure et reprehenderit rerum non cupiditate nostrum. Nihil corporis qui esse exercitationem dolores modi. Itaque velit quia deserunt quo. Facilis nihil eaque accusantium et exercitationem amet sapiente. Officiis ex ipsa minima accusamus et.

Ea ipsam culpa est eligendi accusamus assumenda velit est. Labore aspernatur alias aut debitis ipsam dolore ad qui. Nostrum quae corporis qui aspernatur nihil debitis nostrum. Magnam suscipit et accusantium et. Reprehenderit nulla quidem ipsam animi quisquam fuga.

Et voluptatem nesciunt non dolor mollitia. Tenetur ullam consectetur commodi. Voluptas ipsum et qui optio laborum reiciendis quaerat. Sit dolor sint incidunt eligendi. Libero ut tenetur tempore eum dignissimos eveniet.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”