Performing / Opportunistic Credit fund vs. LevFin at an IB?

Have an offer in hand for a performing / opportunistic private credit fund in NY that invests throughout the whole capital structure (senior, mezz, and equity) that looks at healthy companies as well as stressed investments. Role would be deal execution as an analyst on the investment team. Also have an offer at a LevFin group at a mid-tier BB. Which would provide me more optionality down the road? Potential interests would be special situations distressed private equity / credit (loan to own)

 

Depends on BB. I think CS/BarCap would be worth considering over the credit fund since they place very well to buyside across private equity/credit/distressed. other mid-BB LevFin teams don't really model, so while they still place decently well in credit, it's much harder to switch to the equity side.

but if you like the fund (and it's legit) take it and don't look back!

 

Some GS LF groups model, some don't. Same goes for LF groups at other banks. Also would consider the volume / type of deal flow each industry gets. Industrials and TMT are considerably more active than others in the financing space, so you see much more sponsor activity and get more opportunities to work on LBO-type situations. Just food for thought.

 

I would rate the fund more than lev fin roles. Cross capital structure with a flavour of distress is more than what you would get at a traditional lev fin role. If they've large AUM that's a plus (if you're too small in the space then it becomes either LMM focus and minority plays in distressed).

You may want to consider the BB role over the fund role (i) depending on their niche (i.e. do they play in the safer, BB-rated space, or have they have a record of dabbling in very tight situations - I highly regard CS Sponsors in this space, anecdotally, from the deals I've seen them on), (ii) the experience (are they modelling heavy or are they more cap mkts focussed), (iii) exits - have ppl from those teams went to PE firms (ofcs dependent on whether this is desirable).

 
Most Helpful

Depends on the firm. It's like going into PE right away instead of doing the IB stint- there are pros and cons. Lets just look at JPM for example. Best Lev Fin on the street, and going there puts a great name on your resume forever and you can leverage this name to go to PE and distressed debt hedge funds (I personally know people who have gone to either from their lev fin team). However, considering it is mid BB it might not have the same brand recognition and wont get you as far as a BAML or JP Morgan. At the end of the day going into IB gives you more credibility and options, while going into the fund will fast track that career path if its certain that you want to do that- again tradeoffs

 

Agreed, definitely a trade-off. Leaning more towards the credit fund given the exposure as an analyst, fully knowing it may reduce my optionality down the line, but will allow me to develop an investor skill set much sooner

 

+1 on your thought process here. IMO at some point everyone has to specialize - if you're pretty confident that your interests won't change before September (when you would recruit for the same kind of roles for on-cycle as a first year IB analyst) I'd definitely take the credit fund offer. You'll probably enjoy the next 2 years more too.

 

Another big positive of the credit fund - you won’t work crazy hours like BB Lev Fin. Your hours should be 60-65 hours, you’ll get paid well (90-110% of BB Lev Fin depending on shop) and you’ll learn more tangible investing skills early on. If you see yourself in this role for the long-term, this is an awesome opportunity.

 

Vitae tenetur exercitationem dolor incidunt adipisci unde. Nihil vero amet ipsam quas. Non corporis quam minus et quasi adipisci aspernatur fuga. Dolores reprehenderit iure optio iusto ab. Laborum quia mollitia hic dolorem nostrum quis.

Vero et ab et ut velit ea sunt exercitationem. Facilis est rerum et possimus iure sapiente eum. In doloremque corporis et non eius voluptatum.

Soluta non consequatur dolor aut numquam quasi. Adipisci inventore inventore deserunt aut nisi repellat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”