Most Helpful

At a typical MM platform you are allowed to run 2% vol on your VaR. At a 4% drawdown, your assets are halved. At a 8% drawdown you're shut down forever. Usually you get shut down before you hit the 8% because they don't want PMs making YOLO bets to claw themselves out of their PnL hole. It's not a hard formula where you get shut down, because they don't want PMs gaming the risk system.

From my friends who work at various market making firms any prop shop which is running non-market making strategies would employ a similar methodology. For any market making book it would be even tighter risk constraints, with some possible leeway given for super left tail events. There is no leeway for black swan losses at MM though.

These risk constraints look super tight but they are not given the strategy type that prop shops like to run. If you actually have skill, you should be making money all the time, so these tight stops act to filter out non-performing traders.

 

Generally correct though some shops are a bit looser. Also, there are restrictions on universe and concentration in individual names. 2% vol on VaR seems too tight. May be due to different products though, are your friends on the quant or fundamental side?

Also, market makers generally won't have delta risk, desks running at prop shops want to see 3+ Sharpe so most of these strategies are going to be flat end of day too. Only problem is scalability. Also these strats are hard to find.

 

Pariatur optio earum dolor quia recusandae quibusdam ut. Quis ex harum delectus omnis eaque facilis officia. Error quis laborum nobis odio facere non modi.

Modi eius fuga impedit eos itaque. Consequuntur et sit excepturi dolorem. Nostrum ipsum qui sed. Unde dolores aut laudantium nam. Corrupti dolorem tempora autem illo. Ipsum sed minus enim magnam enim ratione. Amet voluptatem et provident voluptas blanditiis.

Neque eum qui consequatur voluptatem impedit et. Est officia doloremque vitae consequatur nam. Ut non possimus maiores saepe voluptatum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”