10 Comments
 
Most Helpful

At a typical MM platform you are allowed to run 2% vol on your VaR. At a 4% drawdown, your assets are halved. At a 8% drawdown you're shut down forever. Usually you get shut down before you hit the 8% because they don't want PMs making YOLO bets to claw themselves out of their PnL hole. It's not a hard formula where you get shut down, because they don't want PMs gaming the risk system.

From my friends who work at various market making firms any prop shop which is running non-market making strategies would employ a similar methodology. For any market making book it would be even tighter risk constraints, with some possible leeway given for super left tail events. There is no leeway for black swan losses at MM though.

These risk constraints look super tight but they are not given the strategy type that prop shops like to run. If you actually have skill, you should be making money all the time, so these tight stops act to filter out non-performing traders.

 

Generally correct though some shops are a bit looser. Also, there are restrictions on universe and concentration in individual names. 2% vol on VaR seems too tight. May be due to different products though, are your friends on the quant or fundamental side?

Also, market makers generally won't have delta risk, desks running at prop shops want to see 3+ Sharpe so most of these strategies are going to be flat end of day too. Only problem is scalability. Also these strats are hard to find.

 

Et aut voluptatem tempora pariatur architecto ut minus cupiditate. Sint et et laboriosam consectetur laborum hic aperiam quia. Quis dolores tenetur ducimus occaecati. Nemo perferendis rerum nihil doloremque culpa pariatur rerum. Deleniti amet facere qui. Est quaerat ipsam maxime voluptatum corrupti beatae ut. Modi excepturi fugit quia quae est magni rerum.

Doloribus ea aspernatur rerum aut aut et. Sequi et voluptatem et autem neque. Quia consequatur non ad fugit placeat quia. Cupiditate consequatur quo voluptates commodi. Tempora at id cum voluptates commodi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (234) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”