Here are a couple to kick things off:

  • Insurance brokerages: During the GFC, organic revenue growth for the insurance broker industry was between 0% and -2%.

  • Quick service and fast service restaurants: QSR experienced 0.2% same store sales performance in 2009, while FCR saw a -0.2% decline (compared to -4 and -16% for full service restaurants and fine dining, respectively).

 

Yeah. I can definitely see that. Though I'm sure it's easier to cut back on wedding expenditures (especially the extra lavish stuff). I feel like there's more lavish wedding spend than funeral spend. Most people do basic funeral services, not much room left to cut out any expenses.

Cheap retail usually does well as well (paper products, cups, plastics, napkins, etc).

 

Heh.

I used to work in a Hospital on the Finance side. Death and marriage might be recession-proof, but pregnancy is not.

Director of Finance and Corporate Development: 2020 - Present Manager of FP&A and Corporate Development: 2019 - 2020 Corporate Finance, Strategy and Development: 2011 - 2019 "An investment in knowledge pays the best interest." - Benjamin Franklin
 

I'm not sure this is as true as the conventional wisdom would make you think. Volumes might not get hit during a recession, but funeral homes make their money on upselling to nicer services, floral arrangements, caskets, etc.

 

Great point. As a side note, funeral casket manufacturers have seen consistent declines in recent years as there is a growing interest for cremation due to the lower cost.

 

There is literally so much data to evidence of pets being recession-proof you just have to google it... In times of recession, humans will literally lower the quality of their diets to maintain the quality of their pets.

"If you want to succeed in this life, you need to understand that duty comes before rights and that responsibility precedes opportunity."
 
TheBigBambino:
There is literally so much data to evidence of pets being recession-proof you just have to google it... In times of recession, humans will literally lower the quality of their diets to maintain the quality of their pets.

I guess this is why I don’t own pets. I would literally eat my dog before I reduced my food (or booze) consumption.

 

Not necessarily, as it seems that heavy drinking / smoking seems to decline during recession because of monetary effects though some people may increase their low consumption behaviour compared to pre-recession standards. There are some interesting papers on this topic in regards to health and recession (e.g. Ruhm 2000, 2015 and Jofre-Bonet, Serra-Sastre and Vandoros 2018)

 

Software as a Service (SaaS) was remarkably resilient during the last recession. Companies didn't upgrade hardware during the downturn, but they still had to maintain their software licenses and support agreements to continue to operate. SaaS companies are now able to command higher leverage because of how well they performed in the last downturn.

 

Are these all custom negotiated contracts? In recession, is there risk of the incrementally struggling company demanding lower pricing for SaaS? Is there an alternative to mix-down for some services? Those are the risks that jump out to me

 

Solid points. I probably didn't answer the question exactly as asked. SaaS was very resilient, but I'm not sure we could call it counter-cyclical or "recession proof". That said...

Tricky Triangles:
Are these all custom negotiated contracts? In recession, is there risk of the incrementally struggling company demanding lower pricing for SaaS?

These are generally pretty sticky relationships. Consider what it takes for a company to switch software systems in terms of time, energy, and money. High barriers to switching means the customer probably doesn't have a ton of leverage when it comes time to renegotiate a subscription to an already-implemented system.

 

Pretty well. People always get sick (perhaps more so in stressful times) and still need drugs and hospital services. In countries with national health services, recession may lead to cut backs but that may simply mean an increase in the use of generics (still good if your company has a generics arm) and more careful about giving out expensive exams like MRIs and so forth.

 

My opinion is that the true beta of healthcare is understated. The average healthcare monthly expense (whether paid by self or by employer) is almost as high as average housing bill nowadays and continues to inflate high single digits. This might not be able to survive a recession, especially with laid off folks having to pay out of pocket. Political backlash could be the catalyst. And lots of players in the industry are over-earning so there is room to give up returns.

 

Hospitals historically got clobbered on non-collectible accounts for emergency room visits, etc. Healthcare expenses have been a leading cause of bankruptcy. Not sure if Obamacare has improved this. It may have taken some beta out of the hospital industry, but reimbursements are probably lower in general. Meanwhile health insurance costs have continued to soar.

 
Most Helpful

I think a broad way to see this is based on price elasticity. If you're in an industry where the product or service in price elastic then you may not do very well e.g. tourism or travel. If you're tight on money you don't travel. If your industry is price inelastic then you'll probably be ok for the most part e.g. fast food or pharmaceuticals. You can't spend as much on food? Fast food is still your cheapest option. Dying of cancer? You still need that life-saving drug.

Now there are some exceptions to this rule but they tend to be replacement industries. Video games are relatively price elastic (if the price of Fifa went from say $50 to $80 fewer people would buy it) but since video games replace other activities in times of recession, such as going out or going on holiday, they are semi protected.

You also need to look at the fragmentation of the industry and if there are tiers of luxury. Someone above mentioned cosmetics, but the main tranches doing well are lower-end and luxury cosmetics. Why? Because the rich will continue to buy luxury cosmetics as they are barely affected and the average person will have to spend less on their $40-50 cosmetics and drop to the $20-30 ones. This is the same principle that applies to fast food joints - they are at the budget end of the "eating out" industry.

 

Dollar General and Wal-Mart are already smashing earnings. Discount box retailers will do ok as everyone pares back their spending and figures out what they can downgrade to (Target -> Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart -> Dollar General, etc.).

I think the Wal-Mart "consumer exuberance" or "confidence" or however they put it is a little overstated, and I'd be interested to know how many unique customers they had vs. revenue.

Definitely agree with Pharma Guy that it is all about price elasticity.

 

not good - reliant on economic and consumer welfare growth. Most FIGs, such as banks and asset managers, depend on money flowing in from customers which will be decimated during a downturn. However, certain forms of insurance companies may fare ok.

 

I've bought Telecom Argentina bonds after the primaries, so that's that.

You killed the Greece spread goes up, spread goes down, from Wall Street they all play like a freak, Goldman Sachs 'o beat.
 

My understanding is volumes are unaffected or even go up, but consumers pivot towards lower-priced products. Premium brands suffer, economy brands thrive.

What we haven't seen yet is how alcohol responds in a recessionary environment where marijuana is legal. There's already question about whether pot will steal share from alcohol. Will be interesting to see consumer reaction during a downturn with this new factor in play.

 

Low-end probably sees increased demand

Mid- and high-end get destroyed by mix down of demand I’d guess

 
  • Professional services like legal, auditing, accounting - the global firms may lose revenue on all the tacked on services that they provide, but mid-market firms usually provide pretty sticky services.
  • Certain property managements services like basic cleaning and maintenance, repairs, window cleaning
  • Veterinarian chains
  • Therapists
  • Security services, including private security

You may notice all of these are services and not product - people can delay the purchase of products or switch to cheaper ones, but certain sticky services are usually harder to let go of. That's also why as someone else mentioned, SaaS (especially day to day SaaS providers for enterprise clients, not bells and whistles ones like a lot of martech) can do well in a recession. I guess we'll find out about that

Move along, nothing to see here.
 

I'll tell you what won't do well - all these tech unicorns with negative cash flow selling unnecessary but convenience based products largely to DINKs and HENRYs - Uber, Doordash, Blue Apron, etc.

Will be kinda funny when all these post 2010 college grads accustomed to free lattes, ridiculous free food (ie braised duck and gnocchi for lunch), work remote abilities, and unlimited vacation days experience the realities of a recession.

 

I'd say Healthcare is the most obvious one here. Investors currently stock up on their healthcare assets as they view them as the safe haven in the upcoming recession and we therefore see a lot of activity here in Europe right now. PEs basically jump at every HC opportunity they can get and pay well above avg control premiums, especially in the care homes and hospitals space.

 
  • Second-hand cars: people need different cars but can't afford new ones, quite straightforward.
  • High-end luxury goods (think Hermès, for example): top 0,1% tend to keep spending pattern, usually for top quality luxury goods.
  • Debt recovery agencies, distressed asset investment firms (think Cerberus): enough said...
  • If in countries that also have high inflation and high interest rates, probably larger supermarkets: they tend to earn more through their treasury desks than operating income.
 
  • CMBS. The housing market is rock solid. Can't see any possible downside. Lever up suckers.

  • Oil & Gas. America runs on gas, not going to change in a recession.

  • Travel & Hospitality. Even the schmucks of the world need to get take a break from being poor in the midst of a recession, in fact, most people probably need to blow off more steam during one.

  • Automobile Industry. Self-explanatory. No matter how broke I become I'm not taking the train to head back to CT for the weekend just so I can catch my brother's lax game at Taft.

 

Car parts distributors.

  • People buy less new cars. The subcontractors for the automakers try to ramp down their production lines, but end up spinning off a ton of extra parts that aren’t being used in new cars that aren’t being made.

    • Simultaneously, people with old cars, who would otherwise upgrade to something new, look for discount spare parts when making out of warranty repairs.

    • I’ve seen distributors with substantial growth through the recession.

Saw someone else comment here, but funeral homes are solid - people have less expensive funerals, but no one stops dying. Downside cases for them are pretty low.

Similar situation with assisted living on the high end. People might let mom or dad move in instead of sending them to a home if they’re “with it”. For places that deal with Alzheimer’s and dementia though, the inflow never stops. I’ve seen places that will actually get put liens on children’s houses when the parents a checked in if their overall financial picture isn't strong enough - the home is getting foreclosed on before mom/dad gets pulled out.

 

Sit soluta dolorem et excepturi dolorum. Reprehenderit voluptas consequatur debitis alias aliquam consequatur veniam. Animi et aut quisquam voluptatem eum sit rerum.

Fuga consequatur et aspernatur sunt rerum et. Ut quasi ea eos nihil quo. Dignissimos est voluptas omnis ipsum labore et in.

 

Aliquid veritatis aspernatur unde dolore. Fuga repellat est incidunt dolores sed est. Maxime enim libero dolorem praesentium in. Sunt asperiores porro consectetur qui. Qui tempora totam autem modi quia.

Harum temporibus inventore libero optio temporibus porro quae nulla. Fugiat veritatis expedita eos et quod. Quaerat eum quisquam temporibus. Voluptatum laborum blanditiis asperiores dolore non magni alias. Non quia earum et repellendus veniam et iste.

Ut nemo voluptatem et aliquid nam dolores atque. Deserunt placeat quia delectus natus in. Voluptatem voluptas illo excepturi. Dolorem harum enim modi recusandae eveniet eligendi. Autem nulla cumque adipisci id incidunt maxime officia. Pariatur molestiae ducimus adipisci aut quos exercitationem accusantium.

 

Qui dolores et velit cumque nisi non. Laborum in incidunt aut quisquam labore corrupti. Dolor doloribus deserunt eligendi sint accusantium eum. Possimus modi possimus ab similique omnis aut. Laboriosam totam ratione aut minima soluta placeat est temporibus. Facere alias libero iure aperiam ut.

 

Odio vel eveniet dolorem saepe eos dicta omnis. Doloribus qui aspernatur cum. Cumque repellat omnis repellendus sunt consequatur eos. Odit vero voluptatum voluptate occaecati qui magni.

Commodi voluptas voluptatibus consectetur sed praesentium repellendus velit. Et officia est qui dolorem possimus et error pariatur. Delectus exercitationem sint eveniet.

Voluptas aut et iure rem atque quis. Iure veniam recusandae praesentium sunt in. Ut sit ipsam ullam non. Officiis atque expedita eum velit officiis tenetur. Ad aliquid commodi minima aspernatur eligendi. Provident omnis vero esse porro.

Cupiditate veniam illum sint. Laboriosam eius dolores rerum ut dolorem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”