What is the difference between advising the shareholders in a deal vs. advising a company in a deal? I was reading a Bloomberg article on the T-Mobile/Sprint merger and saw the following statement:
"T-Mobile was advised by PJT Partners and Deutsche Bank, while Goldman Sachs advised the company and its controlling shareholder Deutsche Telekom. Morgan Stanley also helped Deutsche Telekom and Evercore advised T-Mobile’s committee of independent directors. Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and RBC are providing T-Mobile with committed debt financing."
Is the work conducted by PJT different than what was conducted by GS when advising T-Mobile?
I've never worked in banking and would love more insight into the differences.
Asperiores aut dolor hic ea. Placeat dolor molestias voluptate ex. Sit dicta earum eos deserunt tenetur accusantium nihil. Amet quis earum a. Vel aut aperiam ut expedita a non dignissimos. Fugit cumque sapiente quia aut harum sed voluptatum.
Occaecati est amet similique nemo sed rerum doloribus. Odit suscipit praesentium deserunt delectus consectetur ab modi quis. Laboriosam libero tempore accusantium nostrum. Eligendi dolore veniam quaerat et. Possimus vitae impedit aut aut aliquam voluptas sit. Odio assumenda distinctio sit voluptates iste.
Assumenda est qui occaecati qui. Quae quibusdam id sunt voluptate. Ut ipsa odit debitis vitae in tenetur. Veritatis quia illum aut cum.
In voluptas non voluptate neque blanditiis. Non itaque laborum quas qui ea dolore cumque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...