Skills section on resume for MBB

I am putting the finishing touches on my resume for recruiting season, and I am at a bit of a loss as to what to do with the "skills" section on my resume. I feel somewhat obligated to include one (seems like everyone does), but I don't really have any specific technical skills that would impress (or be useful as) an MBB consultant.

Below is what I have been using:

One bullet: " Computer Skills: Java, C++, SAS, STATA, SPSS, R, Word, Excel, PowerPoint"

My questions include:

1) Do my programming or stats package skills mean anything? My skills are pretty basic (especially with SAS/STATA ect.), and I was under the impression that MBB consultants don't use much more than excel for statistical purposes.

2) Am I better off listing intangibles like leadership, communication skills ect? My issue with this is that I try to make these things shine through elsewhere on the resume, and I think that such a list is weak without experiences and examples as backup.

3) I feel stupid listing Word, Excel and PPT as skills, everyone knows this shit, should I just drop it?

4) Would anyone advocate just dropping the whole section all together? The only reason I have one is convention, and I am seriously wondering it is necessary at all.

5) Other comments/reccomendations?

Any thoughts appreciated!

 

1) Leave programming languages on. Its an indication you probably know excel/access better than 75%+ of your peer and won't be the guy who just can't handle the model. Be prepared to be quizzed on sas/stata though, if you remember the more common command line functions, leave it on, if not, take it off

2) No. You're right.

3) Yes. See 1 for how you can communicate this value without sounding dumb

4) No. Languages should go here. I wouldn't mix it with awards, they are meant to cater to different types of interviewers (person A asks, is this person excellent, person B asks, what can this guy do for me)

5) Also have interests on there. Makes that awkward 5 minutes at the end of interview once you crush the case much less weird.

 

If I say under interests "Interests include cooking and wine" does that make me sound like I'm a hedonistic drunk?

"We are lawyers! We sue people! Occasionally, we get aggressive and garnish wages, but WE DO NOT ABDUCT!" -Boston Legal-
 

I wouldn't put stat packages on there unless you feel confident using them on a client study with limited support. There are plenty of studies that require tools beyond excel (especially in marketing / strategy, particularly because of excel's limitations with respect to data volume), and if a partner thinks he can leverage you rather than getting specialist analytics support that's money in his pocket.

 

When I interview candidates, the interests section is the first thing I look at. If you think about the process, by the time you get face to face, things like GPA and University are not going to distinguish you (probably the same for programming languages, but depends who is interviewing you). If you don't make it past the case, it doesn't matter, but if you do, I want to know if you're someone I want to work with. Every class of analysts has its ugly duckling, but interests help to weed those out.

 

Well, I think having something that catches the employer's attention at the bottom of the resume is good. For some people, it might be skills (perhaps you just have an exceptional technical skill that would really come useful for the firm). For most people though, I think it would be easier to think of certain interests that are more unique to them. For instance, I included a pretty unique fun fact in my resume, and a lot of my interviewers always began the interview by asking me to elaborate on it. It helped me establish a good connection with the interviewer before diving into the case.

 

Most important is to get into a top MBA. after that, I know people that got hired into consulting with all different types of backgrounds. you have to kill the interviews.

 

Just looked through the resumes of our incoming summer MBA class.

1) Undergrad grades and schools: About half Ivies, a few top LACs, the rest Top 50 ish major universities and LACs. Most had honors or otherwise strong GPAs. Many people don't have their actual undergrad GPAs on their resume, though.

2) Doesn't seem like a big thing. A few with finance backgrounds, a bunch with non-profit, a couple former consultants, generally focused on other geographies/public sector/other things not MBB, a family business, an engineer, and military. The finance people were from both IB and S&T.

3) Between firms, it's hard to say...people get cross-offers from two or three places all the time so it can't be that specific. There's a wide variety of skills coming in...after all, they hire MDs and JDs as well as MBAs. You have to be well-rounded, and global is never bad, but no one is strong everywhere coming in. If you're a quant star, you'll probably end up on a highly quant case on day one, so you get your feet under you, make a positive contribution, give yourself a good reputation...then they'll push you to work on something you don't do as well.

Life, liberty and the pursuit of Starwood Points
 

Can't really answer your questions about recruiting, but I can tell you about the stereotypical consultant at each of MBB. Bainies are young-ish, outgoing, good-looking, and all drink the company Kool-Aid. Brainies (BCG) are slightly geeky, and come up with a lot of papers that the other two look to for advice. And the Vainies (McK) work a lot, and are very proud of their firm's prestigious name.

 

Depends on the level you're coming in at. I would argue that at the entry level, it's all about case abilities. The financial skills are a plus, but there is absolutely no way around the case. A guy who has 0 financial skills but kills the case will get the job.

 

No. It might help buffer your resume and potentially get you in the door, but those skills can be eventually taught if your hired. Its all about how well you interact with your interviewer(s) and your case-solving skills.

 

Aut magni quas harum quasi. Quas sapiente deserunt tenetur quidem est. Sint libero quo qui ut quia velit corporis. Modi et itaque sit itaque. Voluptas nobis consequatur vitae quis.

Nemo omnis fuga excepturi non. Sit quos quidem ipsum dolor dolore qui. Molestias earum vero assumenda quidem ex. Quis voluptatibus repellendus minus. Illum id nobis debitis dignissimos esse porro harum. Voluptatibus aut quibusdam ut ipsum ut aut.

Veniam dolorum qui est omnis dolorem accusantium aut consequatur. Velit quibusdam placeat totam amet qui. Ad in asperiores in quis itaque sapiente in. Occaecati nulla iure ea quia incidunt eum eaque. Sapiente magni eum qui. Autem libero unde consequatur quod. Incidunt consequuntur occaecati fugit perferendis. Earum harum accusamus dignissimos voluptatum aut qui aliquam fugiat.

Qui ut molestias qui maiores. Provident nesciunt velit voluptatem. Quis et sunt esse aut repudiandae id ad.

 

Nisi vitae illum ullam et incidunt odit. Iure omnis labore nostrum non. Porro odio voluptates dolores aut. Sed omnis perspiciatis itaque et. Architecto pariatur praesentium aliquam veritatis pariatur magnam vero.

Facilis qui officia minima non. Ut animi veniam quia architecto at. Est consequuntur error rerum et. Quis officia laborum vel voluptatibus error. Perferendis enim quos et modi quis consectetur. Enim id distinctio in ut consequuntur ex.

Libero earum recusandae veritatis et et perspiciatis architecto. Praesentium voluptas quaerat libero natus velit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • Cornerstone Research 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.7%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $368
  • Principal (25) $277
  • Director/MD (55) $270
  • Vice President (47) $246
  • Engagement Manager (100) $226
  • Manager (152) $170
  • 2nd Year Associate (158) $140
  • Senior Consultant (331) $130
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (108) $130
  • Consultant (588) $119
  • 1st Year Associate (539) $119
  • NA (15) $119
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (146) $115
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (345) $103
  • Associate Consultant (166) $98
  • 1st Year Analyst (1048) $87
  • Intern/Summer Associate (190) $83
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (552) $67
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”