Transaction close in LBO model

Hey,

If during a LBO case study interview I have 2 hours to build a full 3-statement model (no presentation, only constructing the model) with different scenarios etc - should I try to build in a "date selection"-option for when the transaction closes and integrate stub periods in this model even if the case study does not specify when the transaction closes? This takes a bit more time to integrate into the model so don't want to do any unnecessary things. It's just that it feels sort of unreasonable to assume that the transaction closes 2019-12-31 when it is October 2020 now (although this is not what the interviewer likely wants to test, they want to see that you can construct a model..)




 
Most Helpful

Bass12

No, building out different transaction closing dates is not necessary at all. I have never seen that tested and no one will care about that in a 2 hour modeling test. Use the most recent financials you are provided as the closing date and go from there (for example, if you are given 3/31 LTM, go from there and project forward) 

Two follow-up questions: If I am given the 3/31 2020 LTM but closing and previous fiscal year end is in Dec 31 2020, should I "treat" the 3/31 LTM figures as per Dec 31 2020? Otherwise the projected years would have their fiscal year end in 3/31 and also a stub period would be needed. I assume what you are saying above is to take the latest available LTM figures and use that as the figures per the given closing date?

Second question: If I am not given a specific closing date, should I treat the LTM figures as it is the fiscal year end figures for the company (Dec 31) or project each year from 31/3 and have that as the year end?

 

Quaerat odit in tenetur ex. Qui pariatur qui aut explicabo dolore et.

Corrupti soluta asperiores ut inventore. Et modi aut ut quam accusantium animi. Quia aspernatur sapiente voluptatibus ratione.

Possimus sit ipsa nesciunt doloribus. Quia exercitationem id aspernatur eum voluptatum odio aut. Et qui corrupti veniam exercitationem cum quas. Eos ut voluptates dolorum ea facilis debitis excepturi.

Non error est aut ut. Quis aut nesciunt porro error et quod eaque odio. Atque et eos consectetur occaecati.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”