23 Comments
 

I’ve had something where I got a verbal offer from a BB but they need to circle back to headquarters to confirm bandwidth budget and timing, and they couldn’t get it so the offer didn’t go through.

Actually, this happened twice - two different BBs.

Though, have never had something where they gave a verbal indication and then went with someone else. That seems pretty unprofessional.

 

Same thing happened to me a while back. Got a verbal offer and they said that their budget would be finalized within a week. Two weeks passed, I reached back out to them....budget was still in the works and they asked me to be patient. Reached back out a few weeks later and they never even responded....ultimately, no one was hired for the position.

There really is no lesson here for the new recruit; it just sucks and you can't do anything about it. The real lesson should be for hiring teams. Don't say anything until you're sure this is the candidate or you have the budget. No need to even mention the budget if it isn't finalized.

 

What you described was very similar to one of the times that it happened to me. And what sucked was it was an incredibly arduous process - had multiple interviews/calls with MDs/EDs/Group heads in multiple regions (NY, HK, London, etc) and had a case presentation as well.

What ultimately happened was the hiring MD (after 1-2+ months after the verbal offer) telling me it’s probably not going to happen because of group restructuring. He was actually a really nice guy, but the process was a huge time commitment with no payoff. That said, it was probably for the best (getting hired into a group going through restructuring is risky business).

The other one was for a more standard IB role. Was told by HR everyone liked me and want to make the offer, but they need to circle back with HQ. Then week later told me they couldn’t get the go-ahead and hired no one.

My guess is, in situations like this, the group themselves didn’t get clarity on hiring (or are also given more positive signals than in actuality), but know they need to do it ahead of time given need and time commitment to find good people. And then when they still haven’t gotten clarity but found someone, they want to hang on to them and hope they can bridge the gap on budget with HQ. It definitely sucks for the candidate, but I suppose at times it can turn out well.

 

Interesting scenario and I'm sorry that happened to you. I just finished a hiring cycle not all that long ago and I would be all kinds of disappointed if that had happened to me.

Will you consider naming the BB?

 

First suspicious sign would have been them saying it would take a week to get the documents together. For a bulge bracket, it takes hours....

Why get your own coffee when you can get an intern to do it for you?
 

That's really shitty dude. Just try and take it as a lesson and to never treat anything as a sure thing from employers unless its on a contract. Somewhat similar situation to you, I have a friend who signed an SA offer at a slightly lowered tier BB over a mid-tier BB because he was verbally guaranteed M&A (it would be coverage at the mid-tier BB). Ended up being shafted into DCM unfortunately

The banks and recruiters do not give a **** about you, treat whatever they say with a grain of salt until its in writing

 

Molestiae eligendi illum at sint aut. Perferendis laborum rerum libero sequi eaque beatae qui. Consequuntur debitis voluptatum facere voluptates.

Expedita aut fugit quo non. Sunt mollitia esse at omnis suscipit aut. Soluta explicabo quas blanditiis.

Saepe tempora odit hic aut dolor. Corrupti et quis error eos illum amet. Rem veritatis aperiam nulla expedita debitis dicta vel. Accusamus qui ut magni debitis est et.

 

Et ut exercitationem consequatur fugiat. Maxime qui omnis ea non dolorum hic. Ut praesentium veniam reiciendis blanditiis et ipsum est. Quibusdam placeat in eum et ab et. Consequuntur velit doloribus alias minima harum hic. Sunt est est facilis sunt quaerat. Nisi aut error cupiditate eligendi reiciendis modi quos ipsam.

Sed quaerat non tempore perspiciatis ratione vero velit. Et est sunt qui quaerat aut et. Amet aliquam deserunt quo praesentium quibusdam odio.

Omnis possimus velit debitis animi quidem. Doloribus recusandae sunt voluptatibus commodi repellat nobis. Quia alias dolor magni ut placeat. Voluptas nostrum odio ipsam quas repellendus nihil voluptatem et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”