Funniest

https://media0.giphy.com/media/3oKIPzLXQYb2Bn5PLG/giphy-downsized.gif" alt="palpatine" />

Unfortunately, WF taught its bankers everything it knew, then its bankers expensed meals early in its sleep. Ironic. WF encourages bankers to fake accounts and expenses for customers... but not for themselves.

-
 

Excellent. +SB

Site note - they could have done better than Hayden Christensen.

"We're coming in too hot."

 
NuclearPenguins:
What's idiotic to me is that this seems to be just about ordering meals early, not people forging expenses. Like if you order a meal at 6:00 instead of 6:30, which seems ridiculous to me.

Perhaps they were doctoring the times and not staying as late as they claimed? I know a few banks in our city that have fired people for expense abuse (ordering something and sharing it with a gf, ubering to/from non-office/non-work locations)

 

Banks do this when they are struggling and want to lay people off without the negative appearance of a layoff. There's nothing unethical about most of the Seamless "violations" that the knuckleheads in compliance warn you about. Most of it involves getting the meal earlier even tough the banker is working late anyways.

 

That is pretty harsh. I wonder if they fired someone who got hungry at 6:20 rather than 6:30 and then proceeded to work until 3 or 4 in the morning...

On the other hand, there is always that person who orders dinner at the office on Friday at 5:30, meets the delivery guy downstairs, and heads home with it. Less sympathy there.

 

I know this seems like a harsh reaction for a small offense. But technically they defrauded the company. They submitted and signed documents with information they falsified, specifically for the purpose of going around the stated reimbursement policy and getting paid.

I think many places would slap someone on the wrist for this, and it wouldn't surprise me if it was done with a wink and a nod from upper management. It also wouldn't completely surprise me if certain high performers who got mixed up in this received more lenient treatment. But this is Wells Fargo. Unless you've been under a rock lately you know they've got a culture problem with issues just like this, and they're desperate to fix it. I feel for those who lost their jobs over something so small. But at the same time, come on. No one should have known better that it was a stupid time to play fast and loose with the rules.

 

You'd be surprised. It happens more than you might think. People who have a lot of money tend to have a way-above-average appreciation for how quickly money compounds, and it sometimes tempts them to do stupid things.

 

What does fraud even mean? Seriously. I hear that word thrown around a lot lately, usually by people who are trying to make a big deal about something that isn't really a big deal. Whether it's a US president paying off a porn star or an analyst getting an early meal, it seems like some people care way too much about stuff and start yelling "fraud".

 

Sorry - not formatting well but there are six factors here:

fraudulent misrepresentation when six factors have been met:

  1. A representation was made
  2. the representation was false that when made,
  3. . the defendant knew that the representation was false or that the defendant made the statement recklessly without knowledge of its truth
  4. that the fraudulent misrepresentation was made with the intention that the plaintiff rely on it
  5. that the plaintiff did rely on the fraudulent misrepresentation 6.. that the plaintiff suffered harm as a result of the fraudulent misrepresentation
 

It's very plausible. Not out of protest. But for two other reasons:

  1. They lost most or all of their junior team in the purge, that's a real problem.
  2. Since there was likely some stealth layoff aspect to the bank purging the juniors (i.e. business is struggling, need to layoff people anyway so let's make up a scandal) the senior team may have already had their eye on the door.
 

I worked for Wells Fargo in their multifamily real estate capital group and I traveled extensively. I always got the cheapest flight, the cheapest car, the cheapest hotel, and the cheapest meals. My colleagues would abuse the fuck out of the expense program, staying at expensive hotels in hot locations, renting nice cars, and going to expensive restaurants. For whatever reason, I just always felt an ethical duty to my employer to not abuse the system.

Array
 
Most Helpful

The banks policies are clearly outlined. Our travel is booked according to these. Staying at a 4-star hotel for a week during MPs isn't the crime you make it out to be. If people are staying at the Four Seasons, Ritz, etc., which is obviously unnecessary, the MD in charge of the client relationship has to answer to the expenses, so it doesn't affect you.

Occasionally, I found myself feeling the same way you do. But, when I was working until 4am back-to-back nights creating some bullshit ad hoc analysis because the CFO couldn't figure out how to use the ERP system effectively and efficiently, I quickly got over that and made sure to order $50 of room service for morning breakfast.

 
Bullet-Tooth Tony:
The banks policies are clearly outlined. Our travel is booked according to these. Staying at a 4-star hotel for a week during MPs isn't the crime you make it out to be.

I didn't say it was a crime or a violation of policy. I'm saying I never felt comfortable pushing the limits of the expense reimbursement policy. Loyal employees SHOULD feel a responsibility to their employer's bottom line.

Array
 
real_Skankhunt42:
I worked for Wells Fargo in their multifamily real estate capital group and I traveled extensively. I always got the cheapest flight, the cheapest car, the cheapest hotel, and the cheapest meals. My colleagues would abuse the fuck out of the expense program, staying at expensive hotels in hot locations, renting nice cars, and going to expensive restaurants. For whatever reason, I just always felt an ethical duty to my employer to not abuse the system.

There is often wisdom in the crowd, but this is one of the rare times when I can honestly say that I'm disappointed in the opinion of the WSO crowd. Like that one time when I criticized crony capitalism in investment banking--that also got overwhelmingly monkey shitted.

Array
 

Surprised how much MS you got for that. My feelings are in line with yours, but I’m at a smaller place and can demonstrate my thriftiness benefits the bottom line.

I think a lot of the responses are just visceral reactions to their own companies’ expense constraints.

“Doesn't really mean shit plebby boi. LMK when you're pulling thiccboi cheques.“ — @m_1
 

Seems to me the bank might have been looking for an excuse to cull their IB division and these people delivered themselves on a silver platter. Stick to the published rules and per-diem and you have no issues.

That whole place seems to be a mess; they're back on the news again this morning... maybe they just need to dismantle and rebuild themselves from the ground up.

"I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. " -GG
 

This isn’t fraud if the people changing the receipts thought their meal expenses were being rejected because of an error in an automated system. Like if their policy states $25 for dinner if working after 7pm, and analysts order at 6:45pm with the anticipation that they will be working for at least 15 more minutes, then I don’t see an issue - they met the criteria for the reimbursement and are being blocked improperly by the automated system. Imagine if they were paying cash and ordering by phone - there would be no issue with calling at 6:45 for delivery after 7pm.

I think it’s much more likely that people were just straight up lying about their expenses.

 

i think it’s curious that an internal whistleblower raised the issue to management. banks have strictly regulated procedures surrounding whistleblowers which include making sure management takes action on any issues raised.

management might've felt like their hands were tied after someone flagged this to them. i wouldn’t be shocked at all if the snitch....whoops i mean whistleblower had some other motive besides weirdly strict compliance with late night seamless policy. based on the little i’ve read, it sounds like a lot of people were canned for breaking early dinner order rules that people violate every night in every bank and law firm across the country. If so, this really sucks and I feel some sympathy for the people let go.

 

I know a couple of analysts there so I have some insight here and it was not just ordering early, it was falsifying the receipts to change the timestamp (and sometimes the dollar amount), and people also were buying alcohol with their expense dollars (which is against the policy), and using doctored receipts to hide the booze. Obviously, we've all found little expense tips and tricks so it's easy to see the punishment as pretty harsh, but don't really blame management here. Doctoring the receipts isn't an innocent error or little thing, it's a pretty serious incidence of premeditated fraud. For a bank trying to change the culture, stay out of the news, and also cut costs, I get it. Feel bad for the kids, but I get it.

 

Quia nihil perspiciatis iure. Labore aliquid omnis atque ad architecto. Consectetur animi quia sed nisi ut et doloremque.

Optio hic expedita quisquam labore molestiae. Porro quo dolores reiciendis dolorem voluptate eos. In dolor consequuntur reiciendis consequuntur est. Nam est esse quisquam sunt doloribus iusto.

Soluta dignissimos sed atque sequi voluptas voluptatibus et. Excepturi voluptate id voluptas cumque et facere. Quos voluptates dolor cum et commodi. Tempora ea porro aut distinctio iusto animi eos.

Maxime architecto autem et incidunt. Atque laboriosam et rerum est consequatur alias. Qui adipisci accusamus animi molestiae nulla.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (85) $262
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (65) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (198) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
pudding's picture
pudding
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”