• Sharebar

i know they get made fun of on this board, but they seem pretty selective (Jefferies was listed #10 or so in most selective for Vault Guides). I assume 3.7 Ivy with finance internships are minimum for interview, but how much less selective are they really then BBs?

The WSO Advantage - Investment Banking

Financial Modeling Training

IB Templates, M&A, LBO, Valuation + Learn More.

IB Interview Prep Pack

30,000+ sold & REAL questions Learn More.

Resume Help from Actual IB Pros

Land More IB Interviews. Learn More.

Find Your Perfect IB Mentor

Realistic IB Mock Interviews. Learn More.

Comments (36)

  • lindamas's picture

    ROFL VAULT GUIDES ROFL 3.7 IVYNOT EVEN GS IS ALL 3.7 IVY (BYU, BARUCH, ETC.)

    DO NOT WORK AT JEFFERIES U LOSER, IT BLOWS AKA EVERY1 AT MY SCHOOL WITH OFFERS TURNED IT DOWN THIS YEAR

  • SirBikealot's picture

    sorry for the ridiculous stream of consciousness above. don't read vault. both are only marginally less selective than lower tier bulges - if at all. it's not like shit plays out with the best kids getting the best offers anyways.

    "Ride your bike. Drink good beer."
    - Fat Tire Amber Ale

  • LeggoMyGekko's picture

    if you have those credentials, just network and sharpen your interview skills. you can probably land a bb ibd gig at the middle tier bbs.

    then again, i've seen kids royally mess it up with those credentials. it can go both ways.

  • cheese86's picture

    You don't "need" a 3.7 to get an interview at Goldman Sachs. But as was said above, these banks are still looking for some serious talent and are quite selective.

  • SAC's picture

    This Piper/Jeffires bashing is really starting to get old. Its not funny anymore.

  • chimpb's picture

    The 3.7 ivy number is off, there are tons of kids at bb's with 3.5s...some boutiques are more selective wrt gpa though.

    But the pipers, jefferies and cowens of the world are not much less selective than any BB. A superday I had at one of these firms had kids from wharton and stern with two summers of BB experience. Most analysts at these places aren't shlubs either; more come from nontargets but they're generally bright and from good schools. The offer spots to kids at superday ratio is also comparable to bulges at around 10-20%. I know a number of people (myself included) who received multiple offers at top BBs and were put on hold or rejected from these middle market guys. What most people on this board who haven't gone through recruiting (and some fools who have) don't realize is that interviews are mostly about fit. Which means they're random. Which means getting a job at one of these places is still hard. And it should be, these jobs still pay 100k out of undergrad and let you work on multimillion dollar transactions. The XTO deal shows that Jefferies can work on a blockbuster deal as well. Cowen worked on a number of blockbuster healthcare deals a couple of years ago (Huntsman being a notable one). The media group at PJC also does some really cool deals (albeit mostly with an EV < 1bln).

    You might make slightly less money at one of these places (maybe work a little less), bind your own pitchbooks, have little shot at a megafund, and give kids on wso without a job less of a hardon, but you still have a good job.

  • PiperJaffrayChiang's picture

    you're wrong, it's closer to a 3.8-3.9, 3.7 is WAY too low, stop smokin'.

    =========================================
    We are excited to formally extend to you an offer to join Bank of Ameria

  • theMonkkkey's picture

    agree with chimpb. They are still very selective. It's investment banking after all, and Jef and Piper are by no means bad firms.

  • LeggoMyGekko's picture

    i always wonder why kids with bb offers interview with lower tier boutiques where the shittiest group at the bb ibd is still better than the best group at such a boutique...

    for those kids who got bb offers yet got rejected from lower tier boutiques... these boutiques don't want to give out offers to super qualified candidates who already have offers outstanding from better shops. they want to give it out to kids that the boutique knows has the highest change of taking em.

The WSO Advantage - Investment Banking

Financial Modeling Training

IB Templates, M&A, LBO, Valuation + Learn More.

IB Interview Prep Pack

30,000+ sold & REAL questions Learn More.

Resume Help from Actual IB Pros

Land More IB Interviews. Learn More.

Find Your Perfect IB Mentor

Realistic IB Mock Interviews. Learn More.

  • chimpb's picture

    When the people I know and myself interviewed with these places we did not yet have BB offers so that argument is largely non-applicable Still, what those boutique mm's eat up is how you want small deal teams with lots of senior banker and client interaction. I would imagine that saying "yeah, I have an offer at JPM but would rather work at Piper because I want to be closer to deals and take on responsibility. From what I hear analysts here interact directly with clients. At JPM you can't interact with clients until you are a 3rd year associate. etc etc" would be very effective. As to the people I met at the superday who had previous summers at bulges, I assumed they didn't get offers.

  • boutiquebank4life's picture

    ^ i work at a boutique and no one would believe that shit, trust me everyone here wants to go to a larger bank

  • theMonkkkey's picture

    boutqiuebank4life-

    when you talk about "boutiques," are you talking about BX,Greenhill type in SF or an unknown boutique? Or is it MM like TWP or Jefferies?

    I think that would make a huge difference. Of course everyone wants to go from unknown to BB, but I personally know a lot MM guys that like where they are and also received a couple offers from top BB shops.

  • LeggoMyGekko's picture

    cmon man. bx, ghl, evr, moco, laz are cream of the crops. his comment was prob for mm lower tier boutiques.

    if you're in those "boutiques" i mentioned and you want to move to a larger bank... i'm guessing culture just doesn't fit? want to see deals that you worked on in the front page of the journal? etc... can't be the comp since they're so similar... right?

  • Camondo's picture

    I hardly understand why people on WSO keep on bashing Jef & Piper and other boutiques. Honestly, I don't know people from those boutiques, but it doesn't mean there are bullshit.

    Many people here are acting as if it was the easiest thing on Earth to get a SA position at a BB. Some people may be interested in smaller structures and why not about the SME market. Is it a shame? It don't think so. Indeed, M&A are dealing with bluechips like Pfizer or BP, but on the other hand real economy is based above all on small and mid capitalised companies, whether you like it or not.

    Whatever a few people may say, it remains IB and IB is pretty selective, even though it varies from a boutique to another. That's not GS/JPM/MS or burst. IB is, in my view, a question of will to interact with certain people in a certain environment. If you'are really interested in IB, you will able to climb the ladder, If you think IB is only a rite of passage before getting something which sounds to you more interesting, if think you're tackling the issue with the wrong point of view.

  • CorporateChaos's picture

    on the table..../would you rather

    BB (GS/MS) prime brokerage or Jefferies IB Generalist FT analyst

    at the BB superday I was left with the impression that there would be opportunities to get into a Cap Intro role

  • bigmonkey31's picture

    the people on this forum that bash and rank banks do it because they're tired jerking off to their usual beastiality porn. they are insecure about their ego and feel that boosting it on an online forum will finally give them power.

    they are NOT in GS/MS/BX/LAZ/GHL etc; instead they tend to fall in the 'made the cut for BB but would still love to suck goldman's cock' category. and because their jaw is tired, they would like for someone to suck theirs. To distinguish themselves from the rest, they look to their left and their right and try to find something wrong with the 'other' BB or that MM or that non-elite boutique. Otherwise, they'd be lost in the crowd of the non-elites.

  • In reply to SAC
    Boutique Banking's picture

    <a href=http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/sac-capital rel=nofollow>SAC</a>:
    This Piper/Jeffires bashing is really starting to get old. Its not funny anymore.

    I agree, did everyone forget how bad things have been the past year? Things are just starting to get better as far as hiring is concerned. People bash Piper b/c it is based in Minneapolis (which I wouldn't work in that office) and I don't understand the Jefferies thing. Its a solid shop, yes its not JPM/GS/MS but not everyone either wants or gets those offers. Someone also may want to feel like more of a contributor, not the get lost in the crowd type of thing.

  • jhoratio's picture

    I think when people talk about boutiques here it really means the 2nd tier of well known banks below the bulge bracket. There are literally hundreds of investment banks in this country. I could be wrong, but for the purposes of our discussions here, "regional unknown lower middle market investment bank" does NOT equal "boutique." After all, the word boutique is just a euphemism for "really frickin small." To me, there are three levels: BBs, MMs (aka boutiques on this board), and then the literally hundreds of shops just hustling for a deal. Only the first two levels are really discussed here.

  • BFOX's picture

    Comando and bigmonkey 31 definitely made my day. I still don't understand why people keep bashing IB Jefferies or other MMs for that matter..... it is a solid shop and you definitely get more experience and responsibility starting out. As camondo was saying you are looking it from the wrong point of view. We are talking about our careers here, where solid learning experiences + hardwork = going up the corporate ladder. If you are so insecure about yourself and your ability to succeed and you need a "BB approved" stamp on your forehead, then go ahead and keep deluding yourself into a perpetual life of sucking up and running the rat race. My hat goes down for the guy who works his ass off wherever he is, climbs up and makes it BIG.
    In the GRAND scheme of things we are all monkeys working to make someone else rich, our $100+k salary is peanuts compared to all the money that goes into the CEO's, blockholders, and the bank's pocket. That's the REAL POWER there. Looking at the big power picture, whether we're working at GS or Jefferies, we're still monkeys, shop means squat.

  • WallStreetOasis.com's picture

    unfortunately we can't ban people just for being immature -- my advice is just to ignore the people that bash various ibanks repeatedly. There is a reason they aren't Certified Users. Most of them don't work in IB and couldn't get a job at the shops they bash.

    -Patrick

  • In reply to chimpb
    bstej's picture

    chimpb:
    The 3.7 ivy number is off, there are tons of kids at bb's with 3.5s...some boutiques are more selective wrt gpa though.

    But the pipers, jefferies and cowens of the world are not much less selective than any BB. A superday I had at one of these firms had kids from wharton and stern with two summers of BB experience. Most analysts at these places aren't shlubs either; more come from nontargets but they're generally bright and from good schools. The offer spots to kids at superday ratio is also comparable to bulges at around 10-20%. I know a number of people (myself included) who received multiple offers at top BBs and were put on hold or rejected from these middle market guys. What most people on this board who haven't gone through recruiting (and some fools who have) don't realize is that interviews are mostly about fit. Which means they're random. Which means getting a job at one of these places is still hard. And it should be, these jobs still pay 100k out of undergrad and let you work on multimillion dollar transactions. The XTO deal shows that Jefferies can work on a blockbuster deal as well. Cowen worked on a number of blockbuster healthcare deals a couple of years ago (Huntsman being a notable one). The media group at PJC also does some really cool deals (albeit mostly with an EV < 1bln).

    You might make slightly less money at one of these places (maybe work a little less), bind your own pitchbooks, have little shot at a megafund, and give kids on wso without a job less of a hardon, but you still have a good job.

    Great post, and the final sentence down there is perfect. I'd love to see how many of the "DOn't Work at Piper or Jaffrays! Those places r sht!" kids on here are college sophomores who are working PWM at Dad's shop this summer.

  • jhoratio's picture

    The other thing that annoys me slightly is the obsession with target schools - rather the instant contempt rained down upon you if you went to a state school. Perhaps this is true on the east coast, but many of the smartest people in the midwest go to state schools while only some leave home to go to ivies. It's just not seen as that big a deal out here in Chicago. Perhaps that's because by and large the state schools out east are garbage compared to the Big Ten schools. So it's ivy or bust for them. But again, that just isn't the case out here - most state universities out here are top notch institutions (Indiana, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, etc.). People always say - "all their MDs went to state schools" or whatever when it comes to banks in the midwest - I'm like damn right they did, and probably just as smart as anyone who went to a "target." Full disclosure: Chicago kid, went to Dartmouth college, work at MM in Chicago.

  • In reply to expresstrain56
    h.e.pennypacker's picture

    You are well endowed...maybe semi at best.

    Seriously, now that you put him in his place...we'll all be waiting for more of your wisdom.

  • CompBanker's picture

    Just to clear something up mentioned above: Most CEOs and senior management teams don't make nearly what you think they do. At a typical middle market firm with a few hundred million of revenue, the CEO will pull in a salary of $200 - $400k. Bonus potential might be about 50% of base, and that's if the company hits all its objectives. CFOs frequently make significantly less than that. The real money comes from having an ownership stake.

    Yes, the CEOs of the "Headline" companies make millions, but these folks are very limited in number compared to the rest of America / the world.

    CompBanker

  • JohnWall's picture

    not a target? Are you serious????

  • firefighter's picture

    So how selective is Jefferies/Piper? Jefferies was #8 or so most selective in Vault; I take those rankings with a grain of salt but it still reflects some degree of truth. Plus is 3.7 / Ivy the cutoff for interviewing with these firms?

  • 1styearBanker's picture

    To unlock this content for free, please login / register below.

    Connecting helps us build a vibrant community. We'll never share your info without your permission. Sign up with email or if you are already a member, login here Bonus: Also get 6 free financial modeling lessons for free ($200+ value) when you register!
  • lindamas's picture
  • excel_monkey's picture