Josh Kaufman Basically Says "MBAs Suck"
So I read this article a few minutes ago, and I wanted to share it with you guys (as well as some quotes below).
http://poetsandquants.com/2010/10/04/why-josh-kauf...
* Kaufman believes that MBA programs “teach many worthless, outdated, even outright damaging concepts and practices.”
* “Business schools don’t create successful people,” insists Kaufman. “They simply accept them, then take credit for their success. With heavy debt loads and questionable returns, MBA programs simply aren’t a good investment—they’re a trap for the unwary.”
* Instead of paying up to $350,000 in tuition and forgone earnings to go to Harvard, Stanford or Wharton, Kaufman says a better way to learn business is to open the pages of classic business texts and learn on your own.
* Much of Kaufman’s argument rests on a study published eight years ago by Stanford Business School professor Jeffrey Pfeffer of Stanford University and Christina T. Fong of the University of Washington. The pair analyzed 40 years of data and studies and came up with a provocative and startling conclusion: “There is scant evidence that the MBA credential, particularly from non-elite schools, or the grades earned in business courses are related to either salary or the attainment of higher level positions in organizations.”
* “Unless you want to be a consultant or an I-banker (where a top MBA is nothing but a screen for admission),” Godin wrote, “it’s hard for me to understand why this is a better use of time and money than actual experience combined with a dedicated reading of 30 or 40 books.”
* “If you want to work in an industry that uses the MBA as a screen, you are effectively buying yourself a $150,000 interview,” he contends. “If you want to do anything else in business, if you want to start your own company, get a job in another field, you don’t have to have an MBA. It’s better if you don’t because of the debt.”
* And even for consulting, investment banking or Fortune 50 positions, Kaufman says, the benefit is ephemeral. “The effect (of the degree) is strongest immediately after graduation,” he says, “then largely wears out within three to five years. After that, you’re on your own. Hiring managers no longer care so much about where you went to school. They care more about what you’ve accomplished since then.”
* Kaufman estimates that all of these firms combined, from Goldman Sachs to McKinsey & Co., probably hire no more than 5,000 to 10,000 MBAs a year out of the more than 200,000 people who are getting MBAs around the world. The other 190,000 to 195,000 are getting MBAs they don’t really need.
* “Going to Harvard all told can cost you about $350,000. That is mortgage level debt. Put that through an amortization schedule at a 6.8% rate of interest. It’s a $2,200 monthly payment over 30 years. You are spending $821,000 when you account for the interest. The cost is enormous.”





As the OP, I feel I should
As the OP, I feel I should chime in on this article.
First, with regard to actually learning from an MBA program, I think most people on WSO are in agreement that MBA programs are not about teaching you anything. Furthermore, IMHO, a lot of other educational backgrounds will give you the tools to be an autodidact. Studying something really challenging in undergrad or grad school, and really pushing yourself will payoff I believe. After struggling to understand fixed point theorems and abstract algebra, teaching yourself MBA-level finance will be a breeze. It's like weight-lifting for the mind.
Second, I think people will say that MBA programs give you a strong network, alumni base, contacts, recruiting, etc. Interestingly enough, the article didn't touch on this stuff at all, even though it's what WSOers will probably say is the best reason for getting an MBA in the first place. I guess what I'd like to ask you guys, is whether the price is worth it? For one thing, one of my friend's who earned an MBA truly believes the stuff about networking is hype. He claims he and many of his classmates networked hard, but it didn't pay off. I'm actually skeptical of my friend's opinion, so what I find more compelling is the advice on websites like this one and M&I. Namely, that networking is about picking up the phone, calling people, reaching out, etc. So, do you really need to be in an MBA program to get the benefits of networking? Wouldn't it be much cheaper (and maybe even better) to actually have a job (so you're learning and making money) and commit yourself to reaching out to X number of people a week, read the "Networking Like A Ninja" guide, etc?
For my aspiring Entrepreneurial Nomads, check out my blog.
i think it's pretty much
i think it's pretty much accepted that an mba is just a credential, not something you need to actually learn something about business. i've also heard that if you can't get into a top 10 mba program then it's not worth the time and money, which is held up by a lot of what other people have said.
as far as whether or not it's worth it to get a harvard (or some other top-tier) mba, my feeling is that it is worth it long-term, especially if you're going into consulting or finance.
but yeah, a lot of people get degrees they don't need and can't use. surprise, surprise. look at all of the people who get Ph. D's in English then can't find jobs. just because someone's interested in business doesn't mean that they automatically make smart business decisions.
Bingo. I thought about
Bingo.
I thought about getting an MBA:
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/i-got-a-730-...
Yes, the MBA is pretty much a useless credential. You need a JD to practice law and an MD to practice medicine, but you don't need an MBA to practice business. Does it it give you any knowledge that would make you better investment banker or consultant? No, obviously not.
In my opinion, certain MBA programs only benefit a certain type of professional. And nothing beats skill and experience in this job market.
I am DYING to hear what people have to say about this, but I have a feeling most will be mum because what this guy is saying is so true despite what most people on this forum believe. In fact, this thread should be put on the front page blog. Are you hearing me, Mr. Moderator?
---
man made the money, money never made the man
it does benefit people. wall
it does benefit people. wall street finance especially more so than anything. which is what this forum is for.
I need a crib, a big estate, I need a boat and that need a lake, I need some salmon that need a plate, that need a chef so I feed my safe
From trading equities to slanging wine in Latin America
A ship is safe in harbor, but that is not what a ship i
shorttheworld wrote: it does
it does benefit people. wall street finance especially more so than anything. which is what this forum is for.
How does it benefit people? I know that is a basic question, but I am trying to kick-start a conversation.
And I am expecting a basic answer that I have already heard. So lets hear it.
---
man made the money, money never made the man
shorttheworld wrote: it does
it does benefit people. wall street finance especially more so than anything. which is what this forum is for.
How does it benefit people? I know that is a basic question, but I am trying to kick-start a conversation.
And I am expecting a basic answer that I have already heard. So lets hear it.
---
man made the money, money never made the man
Yeah, MBA is the ticket for
Yeah, MBA is the ticket for admission to many top jobs. I think there is value if you come from a non business background, but it is pretty commonly accepted that your not going to really learn anything.
People will keep getting MBAs as long as people recognize them as something special.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
^ Midterms so don't have much
^ Midterms so don't have much time but off the top of my head:
Philosophy 101 utilizes more or less the exact same material for schools ranging from Princeton to PodunkU. Does that mean that the substance that students ultimately take away is the same? No.
I always questioned the worth of an Ivy-league degree. After, all, aren't most of the classes the same? You don't need (and you rarely get) a *star*-professor teaching you undergraduate courses. They're the fundamentals, and they are taught the same everywhere.
The *value* of a "good" school is your peers - and I don't mean only in the sense that you're making a lot of friends who may one day be rich and powerful people (although yes, that is definitely within the realm of possibility). The human mind is enriched most when it is challenged by powerful and motivating experiences and modes of thinking. A Harvard MBA will teach you finance as you can learn in a book - true. But at Harvard / Wharton / Stanford / other elite schools, you will LEARN FROM YOUR PEERS.
Granted, this does not necessarily translate into direct monetary gains (although I'm sure having a Harvard MBA will not hurt over a lifetime). Are you paying a lot of money? Sure. But would you not agree that *enlightenment*, challenging yourself to think in new ways through meeting some of the most capable people in the world, is extremely valuable in its own right?
This article's point is right - people who get into HBS are tremendously successful in their own right upon gaining admissions. However, I would argue that these people still gain to benefit tremendously from the overall learning experience as described above, which can only be found in an academic environment.
For non finance people it is
For non finance people it is a great exposure to overall business. Your classmates also add a lot to the equation. The network you build, the second chance at a career, etc are all tangible benefits.
I think you could get all these things for free, but that would require a lot of outside the box thinking.MBAs off a prepackaged experience.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
oh geeez that's bad
oh geeez that's bad grammar... guess thats what consistent all nighters do to you.
He also basically reinforces
He also basically reinforces the point that if you want a high-level finance career then you need an MBA, or atleast an advanced degree in finance. I went to a shitty undergrad school where I learned hardly anything useful from my finance degree. There was no way I'd get a decent job in finance with that degree, and I quickly realized how much I hated selling life insurance and mutual funds (which was about all I was qualified for). So I bit the bullet, took a year off, borrowed a bunch of money and got a Masters in Finance from a much better school. For me it was well worth the debt and lost income for a year because it got me into a career I never would have been able to get into otherwise, and my income is a multiple of what I was making a few years ago before going back to school. On the other hand, I have friends who went back to get an MBA from the same shitty school they went to for undergrad, and they're still struggling to find a job making $60k a year. I think it all comes down to knowing what you want to do and knowing what you need to do to get there.
Did anyone actually click on
Did anyone actually click on the link? It's some asshat trying to sell his online MBA program, of course he's going to say that.
Top hedge fund/Private equity
Top hedge fund/Private equity comapnies do not want their protegees to go even to top tier MBAs. They think it is waste of time. They will do far better by staying and learning the ropes, once they are in PE/Hedge fund.
Anthony . wrote: Yeah, MBA is
Yeah, MBA is the ticket for admission to many top jobs. I think there is value if you come from a non business background, but it is pretty commonly accepted that your not going to really learn anything.
That's unsustainable. Eventually employers and MBA candidates are going to have to wake up and realize that this is EXACTLY the case: a 150K MBA is a nothing more than a ticket to a POSSIBLY better opportunity and that you learn very little that is applicable to the real world.
People will keep getting MBAs as long as people recognize them as something special.
I think paradigm is starting to shift and MBA's are losing their special-ness.
---
man made the money, money never made the man
Stringer Bell wrote: Did
Did anyone actually click on the link? It's some asshat trying to sell his online MBA program, of course he's going to say that.
Yeah, I urge people to click the link and read the article. But, I don't completely agree with that description. It's from some kid guy who was an assistant brand manager at P&G, and taught himself a lot of things he would of learned in an MBA program. So, he started a website where he recommends books that will allow you to do the same. He also consults, but that's another story because his website is not a subscription service or anything like that.
For my aspiring Entrepreneurial Nomads, check out my blog.
Stringer Bell wrote: Did
---
man made the money, money never made the man
mulandee wrote: Top hedge
I need a crib, a big estate, I need a boat and that need a lake, I need some salmon that need a plate, that need a chef so I feed my safe
From trading equities to slanging wine in Latin America
A ship is safe in harbor, but that is not what a ship i
If you are from WH it is of
I do think the MBA market is
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
shorttheworld wrote: but a
---
man made the money, money never made the man
Anthony . wrote: In the
---
man made the money, money never made the man
many people attend the
mulandee wrote: many people
---
man made the money, money never made the man
What did Matt Damon say about
Buyside CFA wrote: Whatever,
---
man made the money, money never made the man
Experience is a major reason
craigmcdermott
---
man made the money, money never made the man
mr1234 wrote: craigmcdermott
1/2 of the WSO Bash Brothers
"Licensed to Ill It"
We all know Bro J did it...
Everything that you're
mr1234 wrote: And the author
For my aspiring Entrepreneurial Nomads, check out my blog.
craigmcdermott
For my aspiring Entrepreneurial Nomads, check out my blog.
Bottom line is, they are
craigmcdermott
---
man made the money, money never made the man
rufiolove wrote: Current
---
man made the money, money never made the man
I agree with the above
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
Anthony . wrote: I agree with
Hi, Eric Stratton, rush chairman, damn glad to meet you.
mulandee wrote: Top hedge
Lots of good points made
Alex Chu
www.mbaapply.com
^^^^ I like how this dude
I generally think the MBA is
That dude started MBA Apply
The "best 99" books he
Mbaapply might be the best
I read this article last
You're born, you take shit. You get out in the world, you take more shit. You climb a little higher, you take less shit. Till one day you're up in the rarefied atmosphere and you've forgotten what shit even looks like. Welcome to the layer cake, son.
mr1234 wrote: rufiolove
I need a crib, a big estate, I need a boat and that need a lake, I need some salmon that need a plate, that need a chef so I feed my safe
From trading equities to slanging wine in Latin America
A ship is safe in harbor, but that is not what a ship i
Good post by MBA Apply.
Learn Financial Modeling
Interview Guides
Resumes
To all the MBA-Bashers: Have
Anthony . wrote: For non
MBAApply wrote: When you cut
---
man made the money, money never made the man
Yung Gekko wrote: Anthony .
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter