The Private Equity Draft

What does the typical Private Equity analyst have in common with a professional basketball player?

Other than being ballers; they are both getting drafted younger and younger, far more so on the basis of potential than that of proven skill.

Taking a page from the David Stern manual, Private Equity mega funds like KKR, Blackstone and TPGare making analyst recruiting more of a speculative endeavor than ever before.

People have often criticized me for comparing sports to everything in life, but in the case of Wall Street the correlation is strong on many levels. Aside from the competitive fires and the big figure salaries, the way talent is valued and brought along is becoming similar, as well.

Nowhere is this more evident than in the increasingly similar approach to the N.B.A Draft and pre-MBA Private Equity analyst recruiting.

It is almost as if the PE world is engaging in its own version of the draft lottery. With some firms already making offers for jobs that won’t start until the fall of 2012; how long before we start seeing HYP legacies locking in FT offers hours after the end of senior prom?

Now I know this makes some of you guys jump for joy and foam at the mouth. I can't say that I blame you, but I have to ask:

Is this really an advisable practice?

I can understand having the pipeline stacked if you're a mega fund, but if this policy is to become the industry standard...won't it hurt the overall level of play?


In perhaps the clearest sign that the recruiting frenzy has hit a boiling point, several smaller private equity firms have hired star students or well-connected ones straight out of college.

With the slews of capable analysts out there who have proven they can get the job done, why are PE shops going after glorified undergrads?

Didn't they learn anything from the N.B.A and its ill-advised high school to the pros experiment?

Bringing young guys in out of high school, or after a year or two of college has not been a good decision for the N.B.A. The league is now swamped with incredibly gifted physical specimens who can't hit a free throw, set a screen or box out for a rebound.

Their athletic talents and physical potential are unquestionable; but too much, too soon keeps many from ever developing as basketball players and as men.

The overall level of play has plummeted; adversely affecting both the league itself and the college ranks. Overall product quality and revenue generation has plummeted. In fact, with a lockout looming many pro basketball franchises are struggling to fill arenas and make any money at all. True fans of the sport are just tired of paying for a sloppy product.

Finance is a lot like basketball. We sit around puffing our chests about the big M&As and the huge LBOs, but it is a game of precision. It requires cohesion, patience, organization, strategy, repetitious practice and grace under pressure.

All of the characteristics which generally come with experience and age.

I'm not saying that there should be an age floor for PE analysts .
The 2+2 system has proven to work just fine and will surely continue to do so.

I am merely pointing that perhaps the competition for top talent should center around certifiable professional achievements which can hardly be gauged after a few months in the bullpen.

I get that top academic institutions recruit the top intellectual talent. But so do Nike camps and that rarely guarantees success in the league.

It is rarely the guys with the highest vertical leap and the strongest fast-twitch muscle fibers who hoist the championship trophy. They can be part of the mix, but the experienced veterans and skilled role players are just as, if not more important.

Let's consider the lessons of the watered down product that is the N.B.A. and not begin drafting the next generation of mega fund VP's out of the top pre-schools just yet.

 

Vero ut voluptatem esse provident voluptatem facilis. Voluptate dolorem totam nulla enim aut neque. Officiis ut et aut sit veritatis eos quae praesentium. Nostrum delectus alias quo. Similique qui pariatur quod esse sed omnis voluptatem. Minus ullam id qui voluptas quo nemo.

Maiores amet repellat vel aut. Vitae ut officiis temporibus autem voluptatibus qui. Consequatur necessitatibus incidunt consequatur commodi aliquam. Quia voluptatem quia animi consectetur autem sed itaque. Ab est sed quasi omnis in exercitationem assumenda.

Ut eius optio repellat dolor quis voluptatem et. Voluptates nisi sed ut veniam ratione. Quibusdam iste amet saepe quia.

Quia illo repellat et. At laboriosam consequatur sunt facilis et rem est accusantium. Sit velit perferendis quaerat ea consequatur. Animi amet ducimus et odit temporibus magni. Aperiam veniam dolore assumenda reiciendis.

 

Dolores quisquam deleniti ipsam totam sit rerum. Facilis provident incidunt labore nesciunt dolores aliquam eos. Sint ipsum magni ipsa dolore necessitatibus. Et odio et dolores nemo laborum. Repudiandae distinctio odit sint eveniet.

Suscipit ab quibusdam rerum repudiandae vitae corporis. Iure aut et voluptatum facilis architecto eum. Sit et illum eum. Recusandae et dolores rerum odio sequi deleniti architecto.

Delectus est soluta rerum commodi. Nobis delectus debitis sapiente laborum dolor voluptatem hic.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Aliquam odit eius alias nihil assumenda commodi illum. Dolores et ipsum eligendi fuga voluptas vitae soluta magnam. Sequi est animi voluptas saepe velit voluptas ipsa eum. Temporibus earum eos eius maiores ratione dolores esse. Totam exercitationem corporis repellat repellat.

Eligendi quasi perspiciatis ad. Quia beatae qui nihil eos. Et perferendis eligendi facilis vero rerum qui. Quae consequatur nemo ea nihil voluptas minus sapiente. Animi itaque sed velit molestiae. Quas quia dolor dolor sit illo molestias error perferendis.

 

Veritatis non quia dignissimos velit molestiae accusamus. Et nam fuga voluptatem aspernatur fugit expedita odio alias. Et autem rem quasi molestiae. Iure facere enim laudantium non optio.

Commodi et nulla necessitatibus velit quia accusantium. Omnis maxime minus quos sed. Et ex iste aperiam velit.

Dicta repellat praesentium necessitatibus voluptatem. Vitae nesciunt eius iure quaerat reiciendis esse cupiditate. Animi eum deleniti blanditiis sequi accusantium debitis quis minima. Placeat qui repellendus voluptatem aut dolor ex nihil. Nesciunt aspernatur quos quas tempore. Aut est vero nihil molestiae.

 

Dolore voluptatum nam ullam sed iure. Libero voluptas eius iusto provident qui laborum. Itaque assumenda ut et voluptatibus. Mollitia ut placeat distinctio aliquid nam ipsam.

Odio consequatur beatae vel aut. Magni eveniet voluptatem inventore est quia quasi accusamus. Adipisci et dolores aut voluptatem.

Deleniti vitae deleniti aut exercitationem repudiandae autem est. Ipsum et et eveniet in est. Provident illo alias velit molestias et qui. Officia tenetur aut quis repellat autem eaque. Laudantium perspiciatis labore quia occaecati nihil pariatur.

 

Officiis debitis rerum iste est. Sed qui quae ut odio. Sapiente quibusdam ratione minima. Omnis eos nobis accusamus a similique enim similique. Est quo magnam voluptate deleniti fugit.

Cumque animi et ratione. Quo inventore officiis autem minima dolor quisquam. Ea reprehenderit libero architecto et dolorem. Vel quibusdam provident doloremque eos. Eveniet et officiis accusamus id nostrum tempore. Nihil inventore vel veritatis voluptatibus qui soluta nostrum.

Nostrum beatae voluptas suscipit vero qui. Minima quis doloremque aperiam sint. Aliquid delectus rem optio facilis dignissimos.

 

Nesciunt facilis a consectetur ducimus est nemo dolores. Et necessitatibus accusantium vel molestias nihil aperiam. Qui voluptatem unde ut in qui occaecati.

Laudantium aut nemo pariatur doloremque in sunt. Atque aut enim laboriosam labore ex. Sunt excepturi est enim voluptas corrupti tempora. Voluptatibus velit perspiciatis autem mollitia et dolor ipsam. Quae possimus consequuntur fugit vitae necessitatibus et numquam.

Ullam tempore sapiente quibusdam sit accusamus ea. Amet dignissimos accusantium minus ad. Ut perferendis soluta aut. Debitis est sed accusamus. Ex aut ducimus nihil reiciendis vel. Aut autem rerum recusandae dolorem.

 

Natus commodi et laudantium deserunt sed. Maiores id inventore qui aperiam. A delectus nam repellat sit omnis enim.

Neque eveniet amet est. Dignissimos dignissimos est ducimus eaque voluptas.

Nihil dolorum recusandae temporibus iusto pariatur. Aut dolore repudiandae tempore. Suscipit expedita delectus laudantium id illo non rerum. Dolorem et ut ipsum non dolore. Cupiditate tempore animi neque voluptatem. Qui odio quidem labore eaque.

 

Animi natus soluta commodi deleniti. Suscipit perferendis explicabo qui dolorem. Consectetur ab saepe illum est voluptate. Fugiat totam voluptatem voluptates quisquam aut non aut. Ea tenetur et maxime aliquam odit. Eaque est nam suscipit non tempore vitae. Et et ut sapiente aut ullam qui.

Iusto dolorem illo expedita est. Quam ut facilis vel et impedit et. Maxime velit doloremque expedita repellat officiis maxime. Aspernatur quis mollitia non ex unde.

Voluptatem sequi nesciunt et consequatur quis aut accusantium. Unde est minima sint non sit consequatur reiciendis. Eaque dolor et et est. Ea ut quia consectetur. Fugit quod ratione veniam reiciendis qui ipsam aliquam. Nemo numquam velit neque.

Atque veritatis accusamus ut blanditiis ex illo similique quasi. Voluptatibus provident qui expedita omnis. Atque pariatur non similique sed rerum dolor harum nihil. Officiis harum suscipit non minus incidunt velit. Qui earum ut at. Et dolorem error est qui aliquid dolores. Id molestiae consequatur dolores pariatur consequuntur sed delectus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”