Active Asset Mnger w Pretty…Bad…Performance

Hello,

Work for an asset management firm with a single stock picking, old school, boomer head PM. Guy is insistent on individual stock picking and trading. We are fully invested in individual stocks. And with that, the majority of resources are spent on research.

Even so, our end performance is pretty weak. This year has been (so far) great for the markets. 20%+! Yet, we are out here with single digit returns. I understand the whole thing of diversification/income producing instruments/not being fully invested. But, we underperformed in even the very down COVID market. We get more and more client calls asking “hey the market is up 20%+ and we’re here at x, what are my fees?” Etc. I understand it is not so simple. Yet, why can’t it be? Most of our clients are old boomers and we struggle to attract younger clients. Maybe because younger clients question our style?
 

I guess the end question is, is this kind of style unsustainable and the result of an old boss who refuses to change? For people that work in AM, what do your teams do?

3 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some insights and considerations regarding your situation:

Challenges with Traditional Stock Picking:

  1. Performance Issues:

    • Underperformance: Your firm is experiencing weak performance despite a strong market, which is a significant concern. This is not uncommon in traditional active management, where stock picking can lead to inconsistent results.
    • Client Dissatisfaction: Clients are questioning the value of your services, especially when they see the market outperforming your returns. This is a critical issue as it directly impacts client retention and satisfaction.
  2. Market Trends:

    • Shift to Passive Investing: There is a growing trend towards passive investing and indexation, which offers systematic exposures at much lower prices. This trend is putting pressure on traditional active managers to demonstrate genuine alpha and high active share through concentrated portfolios.
    • Barbell Effect: The industry has been discussing the "barbell" effect, where there is a squeeze on traditional active managers who are not able to consistently outperform. This has been increasingly evident in the last 3-5 years.

Potential Solutions and Strategies:

  1. Adaptation and Innovation:

    • Adapting to Market Changes: Asset managers that survive and continuously create value are those who can adapt to changing market environments. This might involve re-evaluating your investment strategy and incorporating more diversified or innovative approaches.
    • Technology and Indexing: Embracing technology and considering factor-based solutions or other systematic approaches could help improve performance and reduce costs.
  2. Client Communication and Education:

    • Transparent Communication: It's essential to communicate transparently with clients about your investment strategy, performance, and the reasons behind it. Educating clients on the long-term benefits and risks associated with your approach can help manage expectations.
    • Value Proposition: Clearly articulate the value proposition of your investment strategy. Highlight any unique aspects or advantages that differentiate your firm from passive alternatives.
  3. Attracting Younger Clients:

    • Modernizing Approach: Younger clients may be more attracted to firms that utilize modern investment strategies, including ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) criteria, technology-driven solutions, and more dynamic asset allocation.
    • Marketing and Outreach: Tailor your marketing efforts to appeal to younger demographics. This could involve leveraging social media, offering educational content, and demonstrating a commitment to innovation and sustainability.

Industry Insights:

  • Dynamic Nature of Asset Management: The asset management industry is dynamic and constantly evolving. No single strategy outperforms in all market environments, and the ability to adapt is crucial.
  • Competitive Environment: The environment has become much more competitive, with a focus on justifying value to clients. Mediocre performers and non-differentiated funds are finding it increasingly difficult to attract and retain capital.

In summary, the traditional stock-picking approach may be unsustainable if it continues to underperform. Adapting to market trends, improving client communication, and modernizing your approach could help address these challenges.

Sources: Is Anyone Bullish on the Future of Asset Management???, Is Asset Management shrinking?, Is asset management underrated?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/asset-management/will-asset-management-industry-just-wither-away?customgpt=1, Q&A: Managing Director at Large Global Asset Manager

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Quia enim soluta temporibus eum facilis. Deleniti voluptas pariatur distinctio.

Ut quis consectetur explicabo labore quas magni pariatur. Maiores distinctio aperiam excepturi et. Rerum non nulla laboriosam nisi voluptatibus.

Ab voluptas eum delectus neque doloremque numquam. Ipsa laborum repellendus occaecati enim officiis assumenda. Iure et rerum cumque quidem assumenda quo. Illum sint sed non aut qui velit et repellendus. Voluptatem nemo ex et laborum odio officiis. Dolor et non nesciunt consectetur officia nulla vitae nesciunt. Accusantium ut in reiciendis tempore.

Consequatur et debitis unde earum. Quia voluptatem iusto consequatur esse. Sed magnam dolore et libero. Occaecati ullam quae sed vero. Omnis aut quas voluptatibus sit est porro.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”