Algos and Coronavirus

For those at quant funds or who know them. How often or carefully do these adjust algos get adjusted to not over-respond to data that’s already priced in? Obvious example would be new jobs report coming out soon. Everyone knows it will tank for Covid. Market has already traded ahead of that, at least to a large degree. So if algo is ordinarily programmed to sell on a typically weak jobs number, obviously it loses its shit when an outlier is plugged in. Would seem dumb to just let that happen so wondering what kind of common sense adjustments are made? Thanks

6 Comments
 

That's what I figured. I heard a lot of chatter last night that the algos would have a heart attack when the official data comes in. I think a lot of the discretionary overlays will prevent that. But maybe still a shred of truth to the theory, since I have my doubts about how level-headed those traders are.

 

From what I know, should be completely fund dependent. Or even different across different teams within the same fund.

I suppose the process of quant researchers developing models to extract insights and make predictions and giving off the models to the quant traders is pretty universal.

But depending on specific investment strategy and technical prowess (the number and the capability of your engineers), trade decisions can be fully automated, semi-automated, or completely trader dependent.

If your model outputs include, price, volume, and exact timing of the order (could be absolute like " 2pm this Friday" or relative to market events "when gold falls below $x") and the exact timing really really matters then why not automate? If the exact timing isn't that important, why even bother to automate? Somewhere in the middle? Who not automate some parts but not all.

 
Most Helpful

To actually answer your question:

From the best of my knowledge, aggregated from close friends who are quants, my own experience working closely with quants, and quantitatively managing my own small personal account, there are couple ways. But they completely depend on your strategy. Not all quant funds are the same just as not all non-quant funds are the same.

One way of mitigating such outlier situations like COVID is to just look at the numbers and not give two shits about what's actually happening in the real world. Volatile markets are volatile no matter the cause. Good quants understand how to appropriately characterize market conditions and how to model them. If you do this right, you don't care what the causes are. You just know that patterns exist and if you've made the right assumptions, used the right data, and made your models the right way, any anomalies like COVID aren't actually anomalies. You've seen similar things happen to the market before. For example, this is Renaissance Technology's bread and butter. Depending on the underlying principles of the fund, some may automate trades (traders get to build these automation modules). RenTech wants 0 human judgement on the trade decisions so they automate.

Another way is to model out the anomalies and their impacts. This is really for Global macro + quant type funds like Bridgewater, one that really cares about what's happening in the world and not just the numbers. These guys are more likely to leave trading discretionary. Human judgement plays a big part for them.

There actually is a third way. Stay market neutral. That might be difficult in practice but you can surely pick strategies whose profitabilities are not affected by market conditions.

 

Ducimus expedita assumenda porro ab. Nam qui nulla ullam maiores voluptatem molestiae aspernatur. Facilis voluptatem rerum reiciendis aut dignissimos quibusdam itaque similique.

Numquam enim dolorum molestias incidunt impedit deleniti et. Quo modi voluptatibus dolorem itaque.

Nihil nostrum beatae aut aliquid. Illo nihil voluptatem ut rerum. Maxime fugiat quas optio voluptate nihil qui. Sit excepturi aut qui aut ut hic. Qui debitis et qui non eos aliquam est. Culpa qui modi sunt perferendis.

Voluptate saepe in praesentium sunt. Quos voluptatem molestias omnis. Debitis illum temporibus animi totam dolores ducimus dolore incidunt. Sunt incidunt molestiae quia officiis suscipit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”