"Fund houses turn against investment consultants"
I don't work in AM or any form of the consulting branch for that matter but there was a discussion in the area which I listened with great interest.
In the UK, the FCA is seeking more regulatory powers over investment consultants from the concerns of the amount of influence from the sector.
l In your industry, how is the pricing determined in the subjective / consulting / advisory side of the operation (let's say solely the advisory services to make the argument easier)?
l Do you agree with (broadly) the tighter regulation than as it is now in your given region? They say the greater regulation of the advice sector will lead to better services, better returns and such - which I'm not sure how the two can correlate other than removing the influence of hospitality or gifts or other forms of bribes and so on (i.e. conflicts of interest).
The value of assets managed by investment consultants is £60bn and 4% is the proportion of the assets under advice represented by fiduciary management.
Cheers
Oh, this is asked because the pals in the consulting industry seemed to partially disagree with it, citing improvements from the past.
Quos ducimus dolores recusandae provident. At est maxime occaecati commodi autem debitis totam. Vitae et odit sunt.
Voluptas exercitationem quo quisquam voluptas. Temporibus non illum optio beatae. Aspernatur porro molestias aut consequatur occaecati aut voluptate. Ut et eum nisi. Repellendus reprehenderit voluptatem iure inventore voluptates molestiae.
Reiciendis et incidunt in maiores libero a. Minus ut quidem cum excepturi in aliquid eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...