Federal Reserve or GSAM
Have worked at a larger AM for little over a year and a half. Fortunate enough to get an offer with the solutions group at GSAM and as an economic research assistant at the fed (Chi/NYC). My background is economics and quant focused but my interest is primarily the markets.
My question is more aimed at the federal reserve and exit opportunities, I would be taking a pay cut but think it would be a great training ground. Additionally, after 2 years think I could move to a BB and do more market strategy focused work.
Thoughts?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, both opportunities have their merits, but your decision should align with your long-term career goals. Here's a breakdown:
Federal Reserve (Chi/NYC):
GSAM (Solutions Group):
Key Considerations:
Ultimately, the Fed offers a unique opportunity to build a strong analytical and macroeconomic foundation, which could be highly valuable for market strategy roles in the future. However, if you're eager to dive directly into markets and client-facing roles, GSAM might be the better fit.
Sources: Economic Consulting Q&A - Past experience at major firms, Economic Consulting Q&A - Past experience at major firms, David and Goliath: The Boutique and The Bulge Bracket, What is your compensation in Real Estate Finance?, A warning to those aiming for Sell Side Equity Research
Go to the FED, there is no proper economic research in AM.
Agree go work for the Fed betwee these two options
Sit repellat corrupti error est qui non qui. Enim et ut magni qui ad iste eum quis. Impedit modi incidunt et delectus qui adipisci eveniet. Inventore earum earum asperiores ratione. Eos et voluptatem qui. Quo ipsum earum ut nesciunt corrupti blanditiis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...