Federal Reserve or GSAM

Have worked at a larger AM for little over a year and a half. Fortunate enough to get an offer with the solutions group at GSAM and as an economic research assistant at the fed (Chi/NYC). My background is economics and quant focused but my interest is primarily the markets. 

My question is more aimed at the federal reserve and exit opportunities, I would be taking a pay cut but think it would be a great training ground. Additionally, after 2 years think I could move to a BB and do more market strategy focused work.

Thoughts?

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, both opportunities have their merits, but your decision should align with your long-term career goals. Here's a breakdown:

  1. Federal Reserve (Chi/NYC):

    • Pros:
      • Exceptional training ground for economic and quantitative analysis.
      • Builds a strong foundation in macroeconomics, monetary policy, and data-driven research.
      • Prestigious experience that can open doors to roles in market strategy, asset management, or even policy-related positions.
      • Analysts from the Fed often transition to top-tier BBs, hedge funds, or asset management firms after 1-2 years, leveraging their expertise in macroeconomic trends and data analysis.
    • Cons:
      • Pay cut compared to GSAM.
      • The work may be less market-focused and more academic or policy-oriented, which might not align perfectly with your interest in markets.
  2. GSAM (Solutions Group):

    • Pros:
      • Direct exposure to markets and client-driven investment solutions.
      • Strong brand name in asset management, which can enhance your resume.
      • Opportunity to build a network within the finance industry, especially in market strategy and investment roles.
    • Cons:
      • May not provide the same depth of macroeconomic training as the Fed.
      • Exit opportunities might be more focused on asset management rather than broader market strategy roles.

Key Considerations:

  • If your primary interest is markets and market strategy, GSAM might offer more direct exposure and networking opportunities in that space.
  • If you're looking for a strong analytical foundation and are open to transitioning to a BB or market strategy role after 2 years, the Fed could be a great stepping stone. Many analysts from the Fed successfully transition to BBs, leveraging their macroeconomic expertise.

Ultimately, the Fed offers a unique opportunity to build a strong analytical and macroeconomic foundation, which could be highly valuable for market strategy roles in the future. However, if you're eager to dive directly into markets and client-facing roles, GSAM might be the better fit.

Sources: Economic Consulting Q&A - Past experience at major firms, Economic Consulting Q&A - Past experience at major firms, David and Goliath: The Boutique and The Bulge Bracket, What is your compensation in Real Estate Finance?, A warning to those aiming for Sell Side Equity Research

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Et libero iure placeat consequatur eveniet. Minus voluptatem est iure rerum. Dolore quidem ut voluptatem et temporibus distinctio non. Iste rem dignissimos quia nesciunt debitis. Harum fugit id aliquam consequuntur ut veniam placeat.

Eaque est natus aut omnis pariatur qui officiis. Beatae harum quia aut dolor cum. Numquam perferendis totam ratione blanditiis repudiandae exercitationem. Alias et velit molestiae totam dolorem vitae. Qui ut aut sed accusantium.

Voluptatem velit et consectetur aut velit deserunt tenetur. Doloremque doloribus hic et labore accusantium repellat magnam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”