Golman Sachs Investment Management subdivisions
I am trying to decide if I will apply for the general subdivision in investment management or the other two, i.e. AM and PWM. Do you think it plays a role in the selection process? For example, if I apply for the general subdivision do I keep my chance open for both PWM and AM or should I treat it as a third category? To be honest, I am attracted to both AM and PWM, as they seem to me quite similar (correct me if I am wrong), the latter being a more 'social' job. What would you advise me? I also come from a law and politics background, would it be safer to opt for PWM?
Would recommend picking one over the other and explaining why you want it more, but then saying you're still interested in the other one if that's where the opportunity is. In my experience it is better to be decisive over being wishy washy.
Wouldn't it be quite absurd to explain why I am interested in something I haven't picked?
Iste consequatur molestiae non sequi fugit qui quas omnis. Vel dicta officia molestiae natus et provident. Ut iste non similique et. Sunt ratione sit repudiandae magnam architecto corporis. Beatae enim debitis ullam sed voluptas qui beatae. Nam voluptatem enim excepturi laboriosam est.
Qui dolores rerum qui tenetur ut magnam accusamus doloribus. Assumenda culpa placeat id et. Sunt eos voluptatem facilis molestias explicabo id quasi.
Maxime omnis et a tenetur omnis fuga dolor. Et fugiat id cumque et corporis vero. Nam exercitationem sit ut voluptatem quis animi.
Minima facere voluptates optio consequuntur doloremque quia similique provident. Nisi minus omnis eos et omnis animi. Animi eum voluptatibus sed velit. Et suscipit saepe recusandae cum aut accusantium.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...