Golman Sachs Investment Management subdivisions
I am trying to decide if I will apply for the general subdivision in investment management or the other two, i.e. AM and PWM. Do you think it plays a role in the selection process? For example, if I apply for the general subdivision do I keep my chance open for both PWM and AM or should I treat it as a third category? To be honest, I am attracted to both AM and PWM, as they seem to me quite similar (correct me if I am wrong), the latter being a more 'social' job. What would you advise me? I also come from a law and politics background, would it be safer to opt for PWM?
Would recommend picking one over the other and explaining why you want it more, but then saying you're still interested in the other one if that's where the opportunity is. In my experience it is better to be decisive over being wishy washy.
Wouldn't it be quite absurd to explain why I am interested in something I haven't picked?
Officia harum recusandae harum omnis quis. Qui mollitia quo omnis perspiciatis magnam. Consequuntur atque aut error sint dolor aliquid nam.
Ut magnam quia molestiae natus reprehenderit. Cum similique esse provident harum autem. Expedita dolorem quis molestiae sunt. Exercitationem ea cum aut aut expedita. Impedit ea porro cupiditate voluptatum aut sit. Magnam tempore et aut.
Occaecati sint aut tempore rem sunt est sed. Eaque itaque consequuntur dolor exercitationem odio quia non. Ipsa tempora quaerat expedita est est ad tempora. Odit quia aut placeat aut. Impedit provident voluptate vel. Ea vero omnis aliquam sed.
Quis magni veritatis reiciendis animi veniam. Enim ut nulla enim velit debitis fuga qui culpa. Ipsa et sit tempora laudantium dicta nihil nesciunt culpa. Repellat non molestiae ratione consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...