Is AM still worth pursuing?
A few days ago I read a post on WSO saying that many roles in AM might be wiped out by AI in the coming years. Btw when i say AM i mean equity analyst LO roles.
Asset management is a career path I’m genuinely passionate about and was planning to pursue after graduation, but reading posts like that makes me question if it still makes sense.
What is your opinion on the topic?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, pursuing a career in asset management, particularly in long-only (LO) equity analyst roles, is becoming increasingly challenging but not entirely without merit. Here are some key insights:
AI's Impact on Entry-Level Roles:
Shifting Focus to Higher-Value Work:
Challenges in LO Equity Roles:
Career Viability:
Alternative Paths:
In summary, while the landscape for LO equity analyst roles is becoming more competitive and automated, it is not entirely bleak. If you're genuinely passionate about asset management, focus on building a strong skill set, gaining experience at top firms, and staying adaptable to industry changes. However, it’s wise to remain open to alternative paths within finance to ensure career flexibility.
Sources: Does long-only active management add any value??, Work at top AM -- AI will virtually kill of entry-level roles in AM over the next 5yrs, Work at top AM -- AI will virtually kill of entry-level roles in AM over the next 5yrs, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/asset-management/will-asset-management-industry-just-wither-away?customgpt=1, Q&A: 3rd Year PE Associate (entering MBA)
Qui et sapiente maiores earum ullam. Repellat qui ea est voluptatem iusto. Occaecati deserunt ut eius.
Eum suscipit minus eum iusto. Nostrum nam et quis unde.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...