Is the firm more important or the specific fund?

If you could choose between working for a Wellington PM that manages $4bn, or a tier 2 firm PM that manages $25bn, which one would you choose? WSO makes it sound like working for T-Rowe and the likes is all that is important but how about the specific funds AUM?

Also do you think the current top AMs will remain the same in the years to come? Have they largely been the same for the last 10 or so years?

 

Ah, the age-old question of firm prestige versus fund size. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a little wisdom for you:

  • Firm vs. Fund: The reputation of the firm can open doors and provide a strong network, which is invaluable in finance. However, the specific fund you work for and its AUM (Assets Under Management) can also be critical, especially if you have significant responsibilities and the fund performs well.

  • Choosing Between Firms: If you're choosing between a well-regarded firm like Wellington with a $4bn fund and a tier 2 firm with a $25bn fund, consider the following:

    • Role and Exposure: What will your role entail at each firm? Will you have more significant responsibilities and learning opportunities at one over the other?
    • Performance and Strategy: How has each fund performed historically? What's the investment strategy, and does it align with your career goals and interests?
    • Career Trajectory: Where do you see yourself in the future, and which option aligns better with that vision?
  • Top AMs in the Future: The asset management industry is dynamic, but top firms often remain at the top due to their established reputation, consistent performance, and ability to attract top talent. However, shifts do occur, especially with changes in market conditions, investment trends, and innovation in investment strategies.

  • Historical Consistency: Many of the top asset managers have remained relatively consistent over the past decade, but there's always room for change. Firms that adapt to market trends and invest in talent and technology tend to stay ahead.

In the end, it's not just about the AUM or the firm's name. It's about where you believe you can grow, make an impact, and align with your career aspirations. And remember, even the most prestigious firms had to start somewhere; today's tier 2 could be tomorrow's leader with the right strategy and performance.

As for the current top AMs, while there's a good chance that many will remain influential, the financial landscape is always evolving. New players can rise, and established ones can fall. It's a jungle out there, and only the adaptable survive!

Now, about your follow-up question '1', could you clarify what specific information you're seeking?

Sources: Long term, concentrated, deep fundamental investing, What Happens when a PE Fund Closes?, AM vs HF: The Business of Our Business, Q&A: BlueWing Part 2: Endowments, Foundations, & Asset Allocators, Can someone make a LO AM tier list?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Id nesciunt veniam iusto perspiciatis numquam minima. Qui officiis quis qui occaecati atque consequatur.

Sapiente aliquid eum et aut. Sunt repellendus ea necessitatibus sit consequatur molestiae.

Et officiis ipsam placeat velit ratione quam. Id cum minima atque debitis occaecati iste. Aspernatur dolores amet ut omnis. Eum eius facilis corrupti impedit praesentium est. Quod quos eveniet itaque vero fugit repellendus maiores. Suscipit tenetur ipsa magni tempore non.

Voluptatibus consequatur voluptatibus nesciunt cupiditate adipisci. Voluptatibus esse commodi et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”