Risk/Reward of Liquid Credit Research Vs Credit Risk
Hope to generate a discussion on the risk/reward of both careers as I've recently learned credit risk has comparable pay to credit research at the director level (around 400k while my seat in IG credit pays 400-500k). I also believe the path to PM from a sector specialist is orders of magnitude harder than hitting MD in credit risk - the competition seems to be significantly weaker in credit risk and people move around a lot more, creating opportunities for promotions. Once you're an MD in credit risk, you're looking at credit at a portfolio level anyways.
The trade-off is there will be more admin work and no short-term incentive to 'outperform' the market. However, the career volatility might be lower especially with way more seats available compared to shrinking liquid credit investment seats.
Am I crazy to think credit risk might have better risk adjusted returns than credit research?
Location is a big factor here, most banks have been offshoring credit risk to varying degrees
GS / JPM / Citi have basically cut those roles in NYC and forced them to Plano (DFW)
Other banks have low cost India, etc teams helping support the credit function
Credit risk at a bank in an IG sector / focus is not a safe career - really don’t need to pay people $400k for that with MD headcount
Rerum nam quia quia consequuntur unde qui reiciendis. Distinctio totam omnis ducimus sed repellendus esse laborum. Vitae reiciendis iusto et aperiam nisi velit.
Porro odit dolores et voluptatem dicta qui qui quia. Dolorem dignissimos eveniet dolore cupiditate. Eius odio quos architecto quia tenetur tempora ad temporibus. Quisquam non explicabo architecto minus nesciunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...