Strategy vs FOF
Currently in a bit of a spot I have two offers for a Strategy role at a top AM and a FOF role with mainly secondaries exposure at a top FOF firm. Which role is the best for exit opps?
Strategy role is mostly multi asset research and has a TC that is ~25% less than the FOF role, but has better hours and WFH.
Strategy role is better for purely exit opps since it is broader. However, I would try and think about what exactly you want to do after the strategy role and build yourself up for it. Even in a multi-asset research role, your team will probably have ppl specialized in econ/macro/fixed income/equity etc. Being a generalist is a double edged sword, you have broad market exposure but no asset class specialization.
Traditional FoF exit opps are limited to other secondaries-focused roles whether it be PCA IB or another investment role. Could probably swing a primary fund investing role at a consultant or asset owner as well. If those don’t interest you, then do the strat role.
.
That is good experience but doesn’t really change the potential outcomes. You will still be best positioned for the roles I mentioned. Exposure to co-investments will probably make you a stronger candidate for a primary fund investing role (they usually do co-inv with their fund partners). Working at an asset owner/LP is highly underrated and a great role btw.
Dolorum dolorem occaecati officiis enim. Ex neque repellat sapiente eveniet fugiat.
Hic odit fugiat at veniam qui vero. Omnis illo officia ut consequatur et odit earum. Amet maiores error inventore illum. Dicta id laudantium eligendi magnam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...