what is the definition for top-tier AM?
today heard someone says, top tier AM needs to have 600 billion+ AUM.
does size matter?
Trending Content - Asset Management Forum
| +24 | Are the Markets Actually Broken? | 4 | 5d |
| +14 | Dodge & Cox perception, reputation in industry the industry? | 14 | 1d |
| +11 | Preparing for no return offer at AM internship | 7 | 1d |
| +9 | JPM PB vs GS PWM — comp structure comparison? | 1 | 1d |
| +5 | Canadian AM Comp (Big 5/Pension/Boutque) | 6 | 3d |
| +3 | Asset allocation / FO head hunters? | 1 | 6d |
| +3 | Headhunters - Europe | 1 | 2w |
| +3 | ARES - culture, WLB | 1 | 2w |
| 0 | Asset Management | 2 | 5h |
Career Resources
how about returns?
Sure, size matters to an extent, but returns are probably more important.
Larger size allows for greater diversification and generally implies less risk.
Better returns, well, they're better returns, but they probably are more risky.
Aliquam eligendi facilis et aut ducimus. Fugit omnis delectus et suscipit et. Necessitatibus expedita adipisci occaecati officia hic. Excepturi maxime fugiat praesentium qui provident libero. Reiciendis unde omnis expedita et laboriosam ab.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...