Actual work and down time of consulting vs IBD
Currently an asso 2 in IBD in Asia, have been rethinking my career goal since the layoff, seeing most of ex-colleagues didn't manage to find a job for months. Thought about doing an MBA and move to consulting once the market picks up. Just curious how much of the work and lifestyle is differ
Hours - I saw bankers often quoting 80-100 while consultants are talking about 50-60 per week. What is the intensity of those hours though? Personally I work 80 hours in IBD but I would say I have lots of downtime during the day especially when I have fewer than 2 actual live deals that I am the key person on it. Waiting for comments, waiting for our formatting or research team in India to come back with formatted ppt / data, standby during the day, etc.
I can't go home / take a nap / watch netflix / study during the down time. These hours are dumb and exhausting as I still need to sit in front of my PC pretend I am working (at most I am reading WSJ). Painful when you have to work 36 hours a week + 44 hours of this but intensity wise at least I am not staring at my ppt and keep aligning boxes or doing non-stop data analysis for 50-60 hours a week. Is it the same that consultants get quite some down time even during an engagement?
Work - I have never come across any real strategy work. During PE deals I have seen a few CDD reports being produced in 2-4 weeks though. And I would say they are horribly insane. 200 pages of CDD findings require endless data mining. In IB we have research teams to help finding data, but a lot of time we have to either DIY again or the data are so raw that we have to spent a few more hours on top of that to clean it up. Is it a lot more different at MBB? Data mining sucks so I rather not to become a full-time glorified data mining analyst again. Previously, I worked on a project which required me to find number of bank account customers and credit card customers for 5 banks in 8 countries. Annual report and company website didn't show the numbers and it sucked spending 2 whole day on it and you ended up guesstimating by using doubtful news source.
Also, most of the time I don't think the analysis are that "wow", but even if you give me the data, I would have a hard time churning 200 pages of texts and charts. Summarizing the findings in 1000 words are difficult enough and let alone put together 200 pages with 300 charts.
How is the non-CDD work in general? Do you guys get access to lots of proprietary data and leverage your clients' business teams to find the numbers?
Hey,
Can help a bit for Bain at least (London though).
Hours
Work
No worries.
And short answer is not at all.
PE funds hire consultants to basically outsource a lot of the commercial analysis above and vet their initial investment thesis. They already have a good understanding of the business, market, drivers, and financials.
As consultants, it is our job to independently verify every single point in great detail in a short time frame (except financials because the fund can do that better than us), and we have to be decisive and efficient. If we are going to tell you the business is actually not in the market segment you thought and the outlook is not as positive as you thought, we are going to make sure we're right.