B4 Risk Advisory or BCG Knowledge analyst?

Hi everyone,

I'm in the middle of a crossroads and have to make a significant difficult decision. I'll put you in context, I've been working in a B4 IT Risk advisory (think regulatory risk adaptation) role for about 1 year. Some time ago I was contacted by BCG to apply for a Knowledge Analyst role, and this week I was notice they want to issue me an offer. After given it a little thought I came with a list of pros and cons:

B4 risk Pros:

• It is consulting after all, client facing that probably I would not have at BCG
• I've been involved in some process transformation pitches, and there are some likelihood I would end up doing some more MC related type of work.

B4 risk cons:

• The type of work is kind of boring
• Chances at a good BS in Europe or US (I'm in a western european B4 branch)

BCG pros:

• Seriuosly is BCG
• Higher chances at BS?
• A bit most exciting kind of work than in B4
• Chances to transfer to an associate role? (I do not know how much exposure to clients would I get)

BCG cons:

• Not client team, back office work, supporting consultants.
• Exit Ops?

They told me that I would have some stints of client facing with case teams, but in a more supportive role, seriously guys, do you think there is any chance to make it extremely well and transfer internally to an associate role?

Thanks!