Bain vs. BCG for innovation and exits into tech?
I'm deciding between offers from Bain and BCG. I've been able to do a ton of reading about the two firms to get a general comparison (a lot thanks to this forum!) and have gotten to chat with people at both firms at this stage. I like the people at Bain better and could really see myself being happy working there. However, I'm having trouble figuring out which firm is a better bet for me if I want to eventually exit either into tech (think Google or start up) or the space industry (think Blue Origin, SpaceX, etc. - my background would be a good fit).
I am under the impression that BCG is a lot more focused on innovation and offers the opportunity to work with startups through their Digital Ventures initiative, while Bain seems a lot more traditional (focused on finance/insurance/etc). This is honestly the only thing that keeps me from being certain about Bain, as I'm worried I'll end up working only on very traditional projects and that the exit opps for tech/space industry may not be as good as with BCG. It seems BCG is known as being very innovative and so that might make for an easier exit based on my interests.
Am I wrong in my assumptions? Any help and insights would be very appreciated!
Both would do great, depends on where you believe you would fit better. While its true that BCG does have more innovation-type opportunities, Bain has more pure-play tech work. It also depends where your offers are due to Bain's staffing model, you will get lots of tech work if you're in SF, less so for other offices.
Agree with this. Bain's projects are quite office specific - there are cases where consultants from one office are staffed on an engagement with another office but these are quite rare. Bain SF (and silicon valley) offices are a powerhouse for tech projects but it is next to impossible to get staffed on these if you are not in those offices. Bain NYC also has very sweet tech (mostly B2B) and FinTech projects but it is also a highly competitive office.
BCG has region-based staffing model which also cuts both ways. The advantage is that you can get on cool projects that might be based out of another office. However, super in-demand projects (like those with Big Tech) are fully staffed way before they hit the project list. To get on those, you'd have to network like crazy. Bain's staffing is not as cutthroat.
If I had to choose, Bain SF > Bain NYC > BCG > Bain Other Offices.
Go where you like the people best - it's the key for having a decent vs. a pretty bad time.
Exit ops are almost identical between the two. Sounds like you may have a background in something like aerospace engineering. If so, nobody at SpaceX is going to look at your resume and say, "He/She looks smart and has a good background, but they work at Bain. If they were at BCG I'd hire them." In the eyes of industry M=B=B pretty much. Choose based on culture fit, that matters so much more for your time there.
Thank you all for your opinions! They really helped me feel more confident in my choice. I'm going to go with Bain. Hopefully I'll find my way to the industry I eventually want to work in. I think deep down I was hoping to hear everyone say "Go with Bain", so that's probably what my gut wants me to do anyway :) Bain has been a lot more engaged with me through recruiting and has helped me meet 1:1 at least 15 Bainies at all levels (including a few partners) that I really liked talking to, so even if BCG might have some sort of an edge for my exit opps, I have to choose based on what I've personally experienced so far from both firms. I'm super excited!
Bain is arguably the strongest in the tech space and a fantastic company in general. If this was BCG v. Deloitte, you might want to weight personal preference vs. exit opps but Bain has equal if not better exits - especially in tech.