BCG to P/E
I've noticed from browsing these boards that Mck and Bain seem to be the primary feeders to P/E firms from consulting. How does BCG fare?
I have offers at the associate level from BCG and Bain, and have an interest in P/E. I sense that I may fit better in BCG and really like the people I've met.
However, will choosing BCG put me at a significant disadvantage if trying to switch to P/E two years from now (vs if I choose Bain)?
I realize that all answers are largely subjective and I may end up going purely by fit alone. But I'd be interested in reading what people have to say.
Thanks.
I have been in contact with Howe Barnes the past month that may or not lead to a position. They are a MM firm specializing in Financial Services (#4 on the league tables). I was wondering if anyone knew general info on them (salary, bonuses, work/life balance, etc). I couldn't find them on Vault and was hoping someone could throw me some general info.
Posted in the wrong spot...
People on this board seem to think that Bain or McK offer significantly greater exit opps when it comes to PE. Admittedly, at my fund the only consultants we have came from Bain or McK, but I can recall seeing a number of interview candidates from BCG when I was going through interviews with large PE funds.
My thought is that if you do well at any MBB shop and can interview well then you will have the same PE exit opportunities.
I am still at an M/B/B and have not looked into the jump to PE, BUT, it is generally understood around here that personal performance lands you the PE job. I do not know any stats, but you are on the right track assuming that Bain/McK offer greater placement at PE shops than BCG. McK for its name and Bain for its dominance in the field of PE consulting.
obviously this is not ground breaking advice, but going with any of the top three cannot hurt.
Just curious, how do you consider yourself a better 'fit' at BCG. Not a loaded question, just objectively interested.
Goodluck, and enjoy the sell weekends.
Bain threw me off for a couple of reasons: -The culture seemed too frat-ish for me -The diversity at the workplace (at least, at the place I interviewed) wasn't very good
BCG, on the other hand, seemed more diverse and I felt like the people were more "genuine" (at least, the people I met).
There are bound to be exceptions (heck, the people I met at both firms may have been exceptions), but I'm going by what I've observed.
Quam officiis doloribus eos voluptatum aut nam ut. Quod tempora dolores adipisci sed nihil neque.
Consectetur ad dolorem facilis provident qui non. Qui praesentium beatae vitae numquam quidem et. Dicta et illum optio mollitia et qui saepe. Reiciendis voluptatem eaque cupiditate aut est rem qui sapiente.
Et aut nesciunt laboriosam suscipit. Aut vitae distinctio officia hic sit minus sit. Quis quia sit itaque. Quae voluptatem et dolores amet eligendi. Pariatur unde eum assumenda illo nobis minus numquam. Odit enim et amet dolore et et.
Nostrum vel quis possimus soluta. Laudantium aut ex exercitationem molestiae. Non rem porro rerum perferendis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...